|
Any answer with facts?
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you sort images of cows or complex numbers?
|
|
|
|
|
This is a very trivial case, before post that q think about it
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
No please explain and then tell me factually, since you like facts so much, how it's meaningful.
|
|
|
|
|
You are lazy like some of the q/a. And you lean back while asking 'clever' q here?
Your words: "How do you ort images of cows or complex numbers?"
Images: e.g. a hash (a very special one, it is up to you to learn more about that)
Complex numbers: any other special things? What about sorting not only a 2.dim, but also 3, 4, .. dim?
Sorry, that are the so 'trivial' things one expect here.... at least when I'm reading Q/A. So go and do your homework
[Edit]
And no, no, no I do not google for you "sorting N dimensions". It is simply a level more than the very simple questions in qa, but I excpect from you that you are able to do it
[/Edit]
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
So tell me what's the meaning behind the hash? Not even going to argue hash collisions. And please what the math is saying about such sorting of complex numbers?
|
|
|
|
|
Still missing an answer to "Ok, then please explain how to index a thing you can't enumerate. Please ...
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, I think I'm pretty aware about the differences ...
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah! F**k standards. Ignore completely what international standards have said for fifty+ years about the semantics of CR and LF.
Sure enogh: The *nix community has for 30+ years argued 'F**k standards! NIH!' - their only 'significant' argument being that it saves eight bits of storage space per text line. That sure is essential, isn't it?
There are sensible *nix adherents. That does not include those justifying LF newlines 'because it saves eight bits'.
|
|
|
|
|
And now please repeat/explain less emotional, that I don't need to google every thing. Thanks in advance 
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
If I understand you right: Any reference to international standards is 'emotional'.
At least if they are in conflict with with what is pushed by the *nix community.
Fair enough. It makes a point, sort of.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm only interested in facts. Therefore explain your facts. Best will be if you can explain it exactely which means most of times explain it math whise
modified 9-Oct-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I am sure that you can sort out the facts. I have the impression that you are an expert on sorting.
|
|
|
|
|
<cr> and <lf> derive from old mechanical typewriters where moving the carriage (and horizontal line position) and moving the roller (and vertical line position) were two different operations.
<cr> is a carriage return. On a typewriter it moves that carriage to the home position of the current line and on a computer it moves the insert cursor to the start of the current line (and on unix to the next line.)
<lf> is a line feed. On a typewriter it rotates the roller by one line space (configurable). On a computer it moves the cursor down one line.
Therefore <cr><lf> moves the cursor to the start of the next line and <cr> should just move the cursor to the start of the current line.
|
|
|
|
|
You could also mention that <lf> changes the active vertical position by one line with no change in the horizontal position. Now we are in harmony with International Standard Six Forty Six (and the numerous others that extends it).
|
|
|
|
|
It may not be earth shattering but it is pathetic, the way Teams works. Wait, make that "doesn't work."
|
|
|
|
|
Lately I have noticed on some websites, there appear to be a lone pixel that does not fit in with the pixels around it. One such website is from our pharmacy. I'm beginning to suspect that these pixels serve some purpose other than what you would suspect.
Has anyone else noticed this phenomenon or am I being overly suspicious?
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I wipe my screens occassionally.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like classic pixel tracking to me. Why they can't have it blend in with the rest of their page however is beyond me.
|
|
|
|
|
"Pixel tracking?!" I did not know it existed! 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
There is a lot of crap out there... and growing everyday. 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Google it. That's one of the oldest things in the book.
If you put an image in an HTML email, your browser will make a request to the server hosting the image and download it so it can be rendered...which is enough proof to tell the originator that the email was opened. And at the very least, that'll provide them with your current public IP. And whatever additional data your email reader sent as part of its request header.
Typically the image is just 1x1 pixel (hence "pixel tracking") and the same color as the background window, so you can't tell just by looking, visually, at the rendered page.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
