|
Well done! I was hoping the potential anagram might be a distraction.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Peter_in_2780 wrote: I was hoping the potential anagram might be a distraction
It was 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Having a day off from the salt mine, fire up the home PC and do a little fiddling, install office 365, I had VS 2005, 2008, 2013 & 2015. 365 took so blooming long, I got bored and wandered off. Came back to PC this am and found 365, VS 2005 & 2008 working, 2013 & 2015 not. I was under the impression that 2015 was under the community licence and wouldn't time out, it appears to have...  , pretty much all the software that I have written is in 2008 so I am okay from that perspective, but can I reset the community licence...![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC it looked to me that way (like VS CE would time out) some time after I first installed it until I figured out MS wants you to have a MS Live account to keep using it. Ever since then no troubles.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
I'll give that a go, you know what, didn't even occur to me! Hmmm MS Live...
|
|
|
|
|
I have a small java program running SQL against our ERP running on iSeries DB2 to create CSV to be fed to another system. All was OK until recently something happened and the data doesn't look right. SQL query was giving exact result as expected when run via WinSQL. We found one of the column wasn't getting right data. All the values were 0.0 . Column in question is of type Decimal(17,6).
I started debugging and found different behavior using ODBC connection vs using direct JDBC driver.
Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver"); // This gives proper data
Class.forName("com.ibm.as400.access.AS400JDBCDriver"); // This converts it to null.
I tried every combination for the JDBC driver. getString, getBigDecimal, getObject. All resulted in null value. I tried 3 different version of driver jar files and they are all the same. Something is not right with the driver.
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Are the drivers from IBM?
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
I think so as jar file jt400.jar came part of the ERP system which runs on AS400 iSeries machine.
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
raise a pmr
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
virang_21 wrote: AS400
Ugh, aargh, spit spit  .
Caused me a lot of pain some years ago
|
|
|
|
|
If I could (in C#) derive a new Attribute from both System.ComponentModel.DescriptionAttribute and System.ComponentModel.DefaultValueAttribute . Yeah, that'd be great.
|
|
|
|
|
Work on Saturday, and you might as well plan to work on Sunday.
Yeah... that would be great....
|
|
|
|
|
This Sunday? No, I'll be dealing blackjack at a charity fundraiser event.
modified 20-Oct-17 19:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Watch 'Office Space'.. the quote may not be exact, but close enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I could (in C#) derive a new Attribute from both System.ComponentModel.BillionaireAttribute and System.ComponentModel.DefaultMoneyAttribute . Yeah, that'd be great.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean the System.ComponentModel.BillGatesAttribute? 
|
|
|
|
|
It would be long, apparently.
|
|
|
|
|
What would the advantage of using ...
[CustomAttribute(Description = "A number", DefaultValue = 1000)]
public int YourProperty { get; set; }... over ...
[Description("A number"), DefaultValue(1000)]
public int YourProperty { get; set; }..or...
[Description("A number")]
[DefaultValue(1000)]
public int YourProperty { get; set; }...be?
|
|
|
|
|
So tried a couple of data recovery tool recommended by folks here in my last thread.
GetDataback showed a bunch of files and folders as it was canning, but then said "No files found" when it completed
I then tried R-Studio. That found only a few files. Recovering them produces some strange files that I've never seen before.
Finally I just got don running Eassos Recovery. I said it found 1543 files. That looked promising. So I paid the $0 for a license and restored them.. None of the files ever belonged to me. In a folder called "Document Files" it produced 92 PDF files. All of them are various language manuals for "My Book Essential" - the old external hard drive enclosure that went bad.
It also produced 1028 video files. None will play. No idea what they are.
In all, nothing it produced is even close to the data I had on that HD before
So at this point I'm out $40 AND all my data.
I'm open to any other recovery options. I may try bringing the drive to a pro but they'll probably just use the same tools I had.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Another one UFS Explorer Professional Recovery (version 5, 64 bit)
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Did you try to recover files using deleted files option with GetDataBack?
In order to understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
No. .I'll give it a try
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
If you didn't lost partitions (partition table), that's the option I would use. Otherwise if you lost partition table and/or MFT (or MFT copy) there's only a small chance you'll recover things. Some recovery software can recover some well known formats from raw data, but they can't be fragmented. Also this type of software will recover false positives (for example it will find PNG header and it will think that PNG image follows, but it could be just random data). So you usually just recover one sector sized (very small) files that can't be fragmented. I hope you still have your PT/MFT.
In order to understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
