|
|
GAMBLE
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, the shameless copyer 
|
|
|
|
|
Not exactly. He left the question mark, you see
|
|
|
|
|
CASINO?
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
That's my answer
Oh my . FSO is tough...
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: FSO is tough...
It is, indeed. But only when you are setting a clue. 
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
WSO FSO whatever 31 July
dont tell me that no one noticed it. Or It's me who's living in future?
|
|
|
|
|
So date doesn't matter here.  nobody noticed or were too polite to point it out
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
super wrote: too polite
seem to be.
Or everyone was so busy in finding the solution out, cause I couldn't get one so I started noticing the subject and date things
|
|
|
|
|
I already corrected the amount of chars; I do not want to be that guy here ...
|
|
|
|
|
since you
Rage wrote: already corrected the amount of chars
you gotta be that guy no matter what 
|
|
|
|
|
~ edit Just posted on N. Y. Times web-site: video of TED interview with Sacks: [^]. Also just posted: essay by Michiko Kakutani on Sacks' life and work: "Oliver Sacks, Casting Light on the Interconnectedness of Life:" [^]~ end edit
Sacks, a neurologist, a prolific author of best-selling books like "The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat," an educator whose many publications helped raise public awareness of distinct neurological disorders, like Tourette's Syndrome, and Asperger Syndrome, died of cancer on August 30.
N.Y. Times obituary: [^]
The popular movie "Awakenings," based on Sack's book with the same title, dramatized his work with encephalitis-related catatonia patients using the drug L-dopa, many of whom were "brought back to life" by the drug ... unfortunately, often for a brief period of time.
Intellectually, Sacks' works helped expose psychology/psychiatry practitioners around the world to the work and thought of the great Russian school of "cultural/historical psychiatry" created by Luria, Vygotsky, Leontiev, and others, based on the early work of Kraepelin.
For many (including the dunce writing this post, now), Sacks' work served as a "beacon" of positivist humaneness in trying to understand, and help, people with distinct neurological problems, and a very valuable antidote to the narrow-minded psychiatry focused on quantitative studies (often questionable) and endless concern with disorder-classification (DSM) prevalent in their own cultures.
Sacks wrote a moving N. Y. Times piece in February, this year, sharing how his impending death from irreversible cancer metastasis was affecting him: [^].
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
modified 31-Aug-15 4:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the sad things about growing old is how many amazing people we lose along the way.
I heartily recommend his books to anyone who owns a brain and has an interest on how it works - in particular (IMO) the Island of the Colour Blind[^]..
|
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: "beacon" of positivist humaneness in trying to understand, and help, people with distinct neurological problems
Damn well put! *sniff*
I would add that he's a beacon of the (career-wise risky) route of making science accessible to the interested layman.
(IIRC it was Sapolsky who noted that when publishing "pop-sci" books you have to tread very carefully, as it is prone to lower your credibility with some parts of the scientific community.)
|
|
|
|
|
One of my pals in the UK was at a cafe in Edinburgh, and with the festival/fringe on at the moment it appears to bring out all sorts.
He was left a hand written message from another customer, an alleged 'writer/comedian/star' as the individual wrote himself on the message....bit pretentious!
Apparently he thought my pals bairn was making a bit too much noise for his liking and rather than say something, left the message and walked out!
You can see pictures of the message and read it for yourself here: https://twitter.com/daveauld/status/638233785574645760[^]
I find it very amusing for some reason.....maybe if you all retweet/share we can shame the individual! 
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking the guy was (in UK English) a "Twat" - but when I saw that he'd signed of as Writer/Comedian/Star I've downgraded my assessment to W@nker ....
|
|
|
|
|
Anybody who feels they have to sign off in this way is worthy of that title. 
|
|
|
|
|
I hate noisy kids out of control in public places (other than playgrounds etc.) so sympathise with the author.
Saying "he should have said something" is just unrealistic in many cases - I agree he 'should' have - but personal confrontation is often scary.
Maybe if your friend got his kids to behave in a suitable manner this sort of thing wouldn't be a problem?
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: I hate noisy kids
I too hate noisy kids. But I have noisy kids, and honestly, telling them to shut up every other minute is much more annoying than the kids themselves.
_Maxxx_ wrote: your friend got his kids to behave in a suitable manner
I am open for all sort of advice, hint, secret potions, etc... that would bring kids to behave.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: much more annoying than the kids themselves
only to you...
Rage wrote: all sort of advice, hint, secret potions,
expectation & consistency
If you tell your kids they need to behave or you will take them home, if they misbehave take them home. It might ruin one night out for you, or even a few, but in the long run they will behave.
Really really really hard to do (I know!!) but it absolutely *works*
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: only to you...
I have globally very mixed up feelings about that. If I have to believe some of my neighbours, the kids should not be allowed to play in the street because they could damage the parked cars, they should not be allowed to run, because they could kill some flowers, they are of course not allowed to do any noise 24/7. No exaggeration here, simply facts. The tendency of a society that becomes more and more selfish, IMHO. Kids are part of life, so be it. Do I constantly bitch about being surrounded by morons at home, at work ? No, I also have to live with them around me, that's life. If I had to give someone a note every time he's been a jerk, I'd have probably killed a forest by now.
_Maxxx_ wrote: you will take them home
Well, we do not go out anymore with the kids, since it is very boring for them to sit one hour in a restaurant without being allowed to speak or run or even stand up, and I have no pleasure if the kids are bored. I'll leave that for when they leave the house after graduating 
|
|
|
|
|
it's all about location, really, isn't it.
MacDonalds - acceptable to have kids being noisy and playing.
Ditto playground, park etc.
Your garden - well, as with any noise, it's dependent on definitions of 'reasonable'.
But my points are generic - it's the same for a supermarket or a playground, or even your garden or your street.
Rage wrote: Well, we do not go out anymore with the kids
Nowhere?! Surely you go to parks, playgrounds, shops, etc. And good behaviour needs to be taught.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: Nowhere
With "go out" I meant in places like restaurants or public events or even shops (unless we need to buy clothes or shoes, where presence is obviously required).
_Maxxx_ wrote: parks, playgrounds
Here you are right, acceptance levels are higher.
But my point was that my children obviously do not have the right to run at home because they makes noises, they do not have the right to fight because they make noises, they do not have the right to get up before 9AM, because they make noises, they are not allowed to still be up after 8PM, because they make noises, they are not allowed to be sick, because then they happen to cry in the middle of the night - what an outrage, how dare they ? They also do not have to play outside, because they make noises and break things. For elephanting's sake, they are children.
To me, having children playing outside and making noise outside is normal life, kids should not always be sitting quiet and silent in a corner of a room because grown-ups enjoy their lives better in silence. I am awaiting the time where parents with small children will have to live amongst them in ghettos, because "they make too much noise". The place I lived is already a half-dead place because everybody must live without making any noise.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
