|
Thanks for the reply.
I have "Photos" set for .jpg and .jpeg files and Photos does indeed open the picture if I click on one of them. It does not open them as a stream when I select "View slide show".
I do not seem to have an app called "photo gallery". What actual application do you have? Is it one provided by default by Win10?
|
|
|
|
|
Windows Photo Gallery 2012
Build 16.4.3528.331
(c) Microsoft Corporation
It's probably part of the "Microsoft Essentials" pack (free download from MS)
But if you're using Live Mail instead of Mail you already have that!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
That explains it. I only installed Live Mail and OneDrive from the Essentials pack under the assumption, falsely as it s turned out, that Win10 would provide the other functions. I have now installed Photo Gallery as well.
Thank you very much for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't just post again when it doesn't appear immediately - all three of these were picked up by the spam detector, and I had to let them all through then clean up the spares to prevent you getting "spammer" kicks!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry about that, but the response I got did not say anything about moderation pending, it looked like a server error.
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
No problem!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
How is this different from online chess against a computer? Something like ThinkingMachine 4?
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Way more complex 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
In my mind I cannot find the difference. isn't this machine still evaluating (time bound) moves and possible outcomes and then just choosing the right approach.
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
With Go the possible moves is very large.
At the end a complete decision tree of all games - all possible moves- there are 10761 (estimated, while in chess it is 10120 "only") leaves...It is way to large eve for a computer, so computers are estimate possibilities of winning (how many leaves under the selected node leads to win) to cutting down the tree...The interesting thing with AlphaGo is that it uses some AI to learn and minimize decision tree...Obviously this approach is very successful - after all AlphaGo won 3 games already...
In the 4th game the move made by Lee was evaluated so low, that AlphaGo didn't took it in count, so when made it confused it...It seems, that at some point all the possible steps had a very (too) low winning rate so AlphaGo picked random steps (seems it can't resign)...
It will be interesting to see the analysis of the game from the side of the developers of AlphaGo...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
That explains it.
Looking forward to a question somewhere that will go like: How to store 10761 numbers in a list?
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
So, if I were at a position in the game where I intentionally play wrong moves and lose, will the weight of right move reduce? I can then turn a very intelligent machine in to stupid.
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
As the machine use both tree searching and AI, it will not happen... 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Mini-Me, we need a new plan. 
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Go is much much harder for a computer. In chess you have typically 20 possible moves on each turn. In go you have 300. Put that into an exponentially growing search tree. So go has been the "holy grail" of the Machine vs. Man struggles for a long time. No one managed to do it before now.
Why is Google's Go win such a big deal? | The Verge[^]
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
Check this[^]. Top computer can win every time at Chess (but not Snakes and Ladders)
|
|
|
|
|
Calvinball
No computer will ever be able to beat anyone in Calvinball.
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
In the game AI world, the game of "Go" was the last "common" abstract strategy game by which computers could not outsmart humans. It is also a known "milestone" in that milieu.
|
|
|
|
|
It's even more intelligent than we had thought - it deliberately threw the last game to keep the human mark interested.
Classic hustler ploy.
|
|
|
|
|
You're prolly right!
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
I was listening to Auntie(Radio 4) this morning and it was explained that Alpha Go uses a form of AI where it learns from its mistakes and from previous games.
The move that caused the win was ranked with a chance of something like 1/10,000 which is why the computer dod not see it coming.
The interesting bit is that Alpha Go is now going to be more capable of not being beaten with that move in future.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
megaadam wrote: we see one last (?) sliver of light
Oh, for pity's sake. This has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence. It is a computer designed for the single purpose of doing something that computers are good at better than the computers that preceded it. At best it it is an idiot savant with the emphasis entirely on the idiot. It has zero awareness of its existence or its environment. It is not thinking; merely calculating. It is not creative or innovative. It has neither mastery nor independence. It is no threat to anyone (unless, of course, they allow it to enter the Go world championships).
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not.
Ok, leaving...
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
