Welcome to the Lounge

Cornelius Henning7-Jan-16 1:56

Cornelius Henning

7-Jan-16 1:56

Quote:
"We tested it all over the world..."

Sounds like a sales pitch from Volkswagen?

How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon

HobbyProggy7-Jan-16 2:20

HobbyProggy

7-Jan-16 2:20

Well they are still cleaner than american cars Smile | :)

Rules for the FOSW ![^]

if(this.signature != "")
{
    MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
    MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}

Sander Rossel7-Jan-16 2:06

7-Jan-16 2:06

HobbyProggy wrote:
"We tested it all over the world..."

To make sure the vest doesn't behave differently in other locations Laugh | :laugh:

Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need.
Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability.
— Edsger W. Dijkstra

Regards,
Sander

OriginalGriff7-Jan-16 2:31

OriginalGriff

7-Jan-16 2:31

Yeah, but after he was stabbed, did they take it off and put it back on again?

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Member 116832517-Jan-16 3:17

Member 11683251

7-Jan-16 3:17

Well localization is important.

ones and zeros7-Jan-16 3:57

ones and zeros

7-Jan-16 3:57

He's alive, isn't he? I think the vest has done a good job.

It's just like a bulletproof vest. If you're shot in the head, then bad luck.

Rage7-Jan-16 4:15

7-Jan-16 4:15

ones and zeros wrote:
If you're shot in the head, then bad luck.

Yeah, I have always thought they should design some headwear, maybe made up of solid metal, to protect the head. Maybe that will come anytime soon[^].

Wastedtalent7-Jan-16 5:43

Wastedtalent

7-Jan-16 5:43

He missed out on this years Darwin award.

Never mind, still 359 days to go.

Kevin Marois7-Jan-16 4:25

Kevin Marois

7-Jan-16 4:25

"The reporter moved during the demonstration, and the "stabber" missed the vest."

So If someone wants to stab you, stand very still.

If it's not broken, fix it until it is

January the 4th, oh no that's too soon...

Mike Hankey7-Jan-16 8:54

Mike Hankey

7-Jan-16 8:54

and the Titanic was unsinkable!

New version: WinHeist Version
They all laugh at me because I'm different; I laugh at them because they're all the same. Kurt Cobain

glennPattonWork36-Jan-16 23:57

glennPattonWork3

6-Jan-16 23:57

Hi All,

Time to complain about BT yet again. Parents moved before Christmas to a place that had a BT line... So I got elected to set up the wireless network. The phone line was not connected and so that led to a Xmas of having to use Tesco's WiFi on my Phone and trips to Bristol to download (and clear the server of Emails). An 'Engineer' is sent round who is from a sub-contractor who does the various tests (which I had done in December) to confirm there is a fault on the line. At this point I asked 'How long', '11th January, they can start work'... Smile | :)

Re: January the 4th, oh no that's too soon...

Mark Parity7-Jan-16 4:19

Mark Parity

7-Jan-16 4:19

There are government targets on Broadband speed and availability, I guess not response times to fix issues.

You may remember my VM service stopped working on the 8th December and its still not working, a whole month with no internet.

Christmas internet access in our house was saved by a 100GB EE SIM, a USB mobile dongle, Raspberry Pi and some configuration of DHCP servers, routing tables etc etc to create a mobile broadband modem/router, thanks EE/rpi!

I've cancelled VM, they are still forcing us to honour the 30 day termination in the contract despite the BB not even working, goodbye and good riddance VM!

That awkward moment...

Sander Rossel6-Jan-16 23:54

6-Jan-16 23:54

When you code up a new page, which is really cool and absolutely the best you've ever done...
Come back to it a few weeks later only to find it's still littered with (JavaScript) bugs Frown | :(

"Cannot write to a computed value"
"Property X not defined"
console.log("some debug info")

How could I have missed that!? Sigh | :sigh:

Well, it was close to Christmas, guess I really needed that break.
Luckily it's not deployed to production yet... Smile | :)

Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need.
Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability.
— Edsger W. Dijkstra

Regards,
Sander

User 110609797-Jan-16 0:40

User 11060979

7-Jan-16 0:40

Quote:
Luckily it's not deployed to production yet

That is exactly the Point! Where else you test your Software? Poke tongue | ;-P

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

Sander Rossel7-Jan-16 2:03

7-Jan-16 2:03

You make a good point Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

Well, I'm sure these errors would've been caught during the (other than me) testing phase, but still... Sigh | :sigh:

Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need.
Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability.
— Edsger W. Dijkstra

Regards,
Sander

Slacker0077-Jan-16 3:22

Slacker007

7-Jan-16 3:22

Sander Rossel wrote:
Luckily it's not deployed to production yet

All testing should be done in Prod. It is the correct way to do things. Only epic fails in Production, will bring you spiritual enlightenment.

Sander Rossel7-Jan-16 3:23

***Star Wars Spoilers Ahead****

7-Jan-16 3:23

Slacker007 wrote:
Only epic fails in Production, ~~will bring you spiritual enlightenment~~.

Will motivate me enough to do some actual work Laugh | :laugh:

Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need.
Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability.
— Edsger W. Dijkstra

Regards,
Sander

Keith Barrow6-Jan-16 23:02

Keith Barrow

6-Jan-16 23:02

All I'm going to say is:

STAR WARS SPOILERS
Dad jokes Ahead
STAR WARS SPOILERS

You were warned.

In the great tradition of clickbait titles "Number 6 will astound you![^]"

KeithBarrow.net[^] - It might not be very good, but at least it is free!

Re: ***Star Wars Spoilers Ahead****

Sander Rossel6-Jan-16 23:47

WSO-FOSW-OTD-07-01-16 One last hint

6-Jan-16 23:47

The cliffhanger one! Laugh | :laugh:

Well, all of them really Laugh | :laugh:

Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need.
Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability.
— Edsger W. Dijkstra

Regards,
Sander

Rage6-Jan-16 21:32

6-Jan-16 21:32

I hope you enjoyed the holiday yesterday. Since nobody complained about the missing FOSW, I hope you did.

◺◣◢◿ (4)

First hint : Already given above.
Second hint : Three were wearing it.
Third hint : Royal and wise.
Fourth hint : Here[^]
Summary hint : They were three, were royal and wise, were wearing the thing badly sketched above, and I indirectly gave a hint about them in the first sentence of my post. They are the .... ?

modified 7-Jan-16 7:27am.

HobbyProggy6-Jan-16 21:49

HobbyProggy

6-Jan-16 21:49

Oh dear, the thing that came to my mind is not KSS

Rules for the FOSW ![^]

if(this.signature != "")
{
    MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
    MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}

Rage6-Jan-16 21:58

6-Jan-16 21:58

I meant that I had already given a hint, not that I don't give an Elephant.

OriginalGriff6-Jan-16 22:06

OriginalGriff

6-Jan-16 22:06

WING?
As in "wing collar"?

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Rage6-Jan-16 22:18

6-Jan-16 22:18

2 whites.
It is not a collar, but the limited number of letters did not allow for a better representation. A child would have pictured it that way, I think.