|
Deep Thought, obviously. And the answer (SPOILER!) is 42.
The user can't update the up: we update it for them (Choice in the CP poll)
|
|
|
|
|
Life is more than playing chess.
Besides, we have learned a lot since Deep Thought was the big thing.
Actually, I don't know which is highest ranked nowadays.
We have enough entertainment watching Magnus Carlsen.
|
|
|
|
|
Now you got me. I actually meant this one here, which the chess computer was named after:
Quote: Deep Thought is a computer that was created by the pan-dimensional, hyper-intelligent species of beings (whose three-dimensional protrusions into our universe are ordinary white mice) to come up with the Answer to The Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. Deep Thought is the size of a small city. When, after seven and a half million years of calculation, the answer finally turns out to be 42, Deep Thought admonishes Loonquawl and Phouchg (the receivers of the Ultimate Answer) that "[she] checked it very thoroughly, and that quite definitely is the answer. I think the problem, to be quite honest with you is that you've never actually known what the question was."
Deep Thought does not know the ultimate question to Life, the Universe and Everything, but offers to design an even more powerful computer, Earth, to calculate it. After ten million years of calculation, the Earth is destroyed by Vogons five minutes before the computation is complete.
The user can't update the up: we update it for them (Choice in the CP poll)
|
|
|
|
|
I think you mean Deep Blue.
That was a big thing when it beat Kasparov decades ago, and it had nothing to do with deep learning. Today there is a lotta hype about "deep learning", perhaps more so in the financial press than the technical.
But I agree: watching Carlsen and those guys is always entertaining.
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Deep Thought was a successor of Deep Blue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What if C-A-T really spelled dog?
|
|
|
|
|
C-A-T ... That is "Canine Aided Training", isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
megaadam wrote: But what lies beneath that?
Deep Screw Ups.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know. In that case I am always cutting edge!
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Not - this time - car insurance, but Kaspersky.
My existing Kaspersky Internet Security subscription runs out soon, and Kaspersky are keen to keep me as a customer. SO I get to renew my 1 year, 1 device subscription for the low, low price of £34.99.
Exactly the same as a new customer.
Or ... and this is just a thought, Kaspersky ... I could go to Amazon, and buy a 1 year, 3 device subscription for the same product for £18.99, including Prime delivery, and use it on my desktop, the WookieTab, and Herself's Android.
Difficult decision this ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I recently bought it from here : Buy Kaspersky K-KIS-31 Anti-Virus - SaveOnIT.com.au[^]
Note : I am not in any way associated with them. I am just a happy customer.
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
£6? 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
How naive, actually you get a loyalty bonus for staying with a product. People who blindly keep renewing their product/service without putting the bastards to the sword are the bread and butter of any industry. If you don't shop/move around they will simply keep jacking up the price.
One of the primary requirements of "Big Data" is to identify your customers likely to churn so you can do something to retain them. the sheep just get fleeced year after year.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: actually you get a loyalty bonus for staying with a product.
And that's exactly the point that should be, but it is not. Companies don't give a crap for current customers and usually is more expensive to stay than to change.
I have already had funny discussions with customer hotlines due to this. Everything changes when you say: "OK, then I want to cancel the contract", then everything is "did you know about...?"
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, and that's really stupid. These are customers you don't have to spend money to find! So use the effort to locate new customers, and keep the existing ones sweet. Especially when it's an electronic product so there is no duplication or manufacturing cost ... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. I got almost 20% cheaper internet once and 25% more bandwidth for the same price another time just changing / threatening to change provider
The best is... now I am back to my first one.
Why didn't they just gave me the bonuses before? That would have saved me time and them some administration costs
That was 2,5 years ago, now they are pissing me off with some connection interruptions, I think due to segmentation. I have called them twice and no solution / concrete explanation for the sporadic issue.
I am starting to see what is out there on the market (again  )
I would be happy to stay, but if you don't show the teeth from time to time, they do what they want.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Why didn't they just gave me the bonuses before? That would have saved me time and them some administration cost
Because some people do not change. And they cannot determine that until you do in fact change. And of those that change some do not do it as soon as they can.
Retention is often based on the customer initiated call to say that the customer is changing unless they are offered a deal.
|
|
|
|
|
In Holland we know this as 'trouwe klanten boete', which means 'loyal customer fine' 
|
|
|
|
|
Why does anyone buy a security product made by Russians??!!! 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
We are Norton users and it is the same thing.
You can allow Norton to auto-charge you each year (which I'm totally against, in principle anyways) and they will charge you $79.99 for that convenience.
Instead, I go to amazon and buy the downloadable key for $29.99 (and some years cheaper).
Type the key into the old systems and they are ready to go.
Why wouldn't Norton do that via auto-charge? Not sure, but I guess I wouldn't do that anyways. 
|
|
|
|
|
I have developing application in WPF. User can add controls from toolskit where controls will add to the canvas.
In this scenario, values changed in one control should reflect in another control.
How do I implement this?
Thanks,
Venu
|
|
|
|
|
You're at the wrong part of the website; this is the Lounge. For programming questions, the link above in bold red is where you need to ask. [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Or you could ask in the dedicated WPF forum!
The answer is to bind both controls to the same data source.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
