|
Shirley, but I have to change phones every ten minutes, anyway, because I'm notoriously good at breaking them.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I just got a system update on my Google Pixel XL phone. Android is an open source system and it is hardly google's fault that some vendor didn't bother to provide updates.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I get that point, but unfortunately, knowing who to blame provides nothing of value to those who don't buy their devices directly from Google. And as far as I understand it, very few do.
Somebody needs to be in charge of the entire Android ecosystem--and clearly, Google has failed to do so. And I don't think they even want that job.
I've been saying since I first heard of the concept of open source in the early 90s that it's great in theory, but the real world works differently. This is the perfect example.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: rocketSurgery
LOL. Good one combining "brain surgery & rocket science". You should copyright that word.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly (for me), it's not mine, and I don't remember the source, or I'd happily cite it.
It goes back at least ten years, to a newsgroup (I don't even remember which one). I've been using it since, and offering kudos to the guy (or gal) who came up with it whenever appropriate (like now).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I heard it first from Frank Caliendo in his impression of George Bush at least ten years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like about the same time I first saw it, so that might even be the original source, repeated in the newsgroup.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So what you guys are saying is that George W. Bush came up with the word? 
When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others.
Same thing when you are stupid.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, someone taking the p1ss out of Dubya.
Personally, I prefer harder targets.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That won't stop the bad guys. It has nothing to do with installing apps of unknown origin into our phone. Android operating system itself is bugged and can be easily exploited. Also most vendors don't bother patching their products.
modified 5-May-17 23:14pm.
|
|
|
|
|
So ... viruses, trojans, ransomware, and malware never target Windows devices. I wish someone had told me that ages ago: I could have saved a fortune in security products.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Security for winio doesn't cost a penny.
Just never boot it up, and you'll be happier and safer.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDDs are mechanical: it's never a question of "if" it will fail, it'a always "when".
And I'm even more prone to losing files than a flaky HDD is... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Of course you're right! A good discipline maintaining images not only saves your behind in most cases when you are attacked by malware, but very importantly also in case of drive failures. And don't think SSDs are immune to failure. I have had two fail on me after a few years of service! 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I could have saved a fortune in security products.
My tired eyes first read that as "I could have saved a fortune in sanitary products." I laughed because it was still applicable.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
And the field name?
.
.
.
.
.
.
non_zero_claim_count
And this from the docs of a company that scores your insurance claim risk.
Even more amusingly, if you have no claims, you leave the field blank! 
Marc
Latest Article - Merkle Trees
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice to know the history of how it got to that point...
Was it designed as, "This field must have a non-zero value", and then the business changed?
I'm encountering items like that on a daily basis with the project I'm working with - what was asked for upfront is not what is being asked for now, so a name is a placeholder, but doesn't necessarily impart any description of actual use.
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Carmichael wrote: Was it designed as, "This field must have a non-zero value", and then the business changed?
We have lots of stuff like that. Display names change often and is often too much work for what it's worth to rename the actual field. Of course we never name a field with the business logic embedded into the name. That seems weird to me.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: non_zero_claim_count
Perfect!
Provides valuable ambiguity so you can wonder.
Here are some other Top Hits created by Cluless-Dev:
var ThisIsTheOne = 5;
bool DoesTheThingWithAResult(){
}
void DoesTheThingWithoutAResult(){
}
|
|
|
|
|
I can't help but ponder that simply using "claim_count" would be enough, for an intelligent developer.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, which is it? non_zero or (greater than or equal to zero) ?
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly.
And why even use a Boolean, if the number of claims can be any integer above -1?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it obvious? It makes perfect sense! It's the number of non-zero value claims, so it can be zero if there have been no claims or if the claims were for zero value.
(I must have been working in my current contract too long if they've got me thinking the same way they do..
Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Having declined a contract refactoring 1000s of spreadsheets that ran a major Oz insurance company I am not surprised by anything they do. A few years later said company went tits up in a major scandal.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
