|
|
I really wouldn't worry. There are 1.3billion Twitter accounts but the chances of any of them stumbling across your tweet is vanishingly small (especially with a total absence of hashtags or any "trending" content). The only people who stand any chance of ever seeing it is the subset of Twitter users who are your friends AND whom you invite AND can actually be bothered to look rather than just telling you they will.
I started a Twitter account 10 years ago this month for my wife's beekeeping activities; we're now up to 356 followers but probably only around 100 of those will ever even log on to Twitter, and maybe a dozen will see our tweets. The only plus point is that my cool "millenial" daughter has just under 200 followers, a source of constant chagrin to her!
If you really want to get attention on Twitter, the only way is to hijack some other mega-thread which is likely to be about some "celeb" or other, but the followers of that thread may struggle with words like "permissible" and "compelling". 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I think my pseudo-tweet post did not fly as irony/satire DerekT-P wrote: If you really want to get attention on Twitter
I've never had a Twitter account, and never will ... but, let me assure you that, if I ever did, I would strive to make each tweet as verbose/glossolalic as possible with the assumption that anything that reduced the number of followers to a minimum was optimal.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
It sure didn't. As a tool, Twitter can be used appropriately (when it can be very useful) or it can be mis-used.
|
|
|
|
|
DerekT-P wrote: As a tool, Twitter can be used appropriately (when it can be very useful)
Hi Derek, I am sure you are right, and I'd be curious to know what some specific appropriate uses are.
By choice, I'm kind of halfway round the world, and am something of a hermit; since about ten years ago don't know other nerds to hang out with here ... who are worth hanging out with
The few digerati Thais I know that are using Twitter/FaceBook/Line/Instagram are, imho, often immersed in it deeply, playing games, watching videos. imho, they are filling their heads with static more than they are doing useful things like checking on the kids, whatever. But, that's also a reflection of the fact that, historically, Thai culture is centered on groups that often maintain constant intimate contact (of course, that's rapidly changing as westernization takes hold).
Someone like me, who lives in a house, alone, is considered very odd by Thais. But, there are some advantages of appearing to be a puzzle
cheers, Bill
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
"Nothing worthwhile has ever been typed with one's thumbs"
I'd just leave it at that, but YMMV.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
How is flutter significant and helpful to create a cross-platform mobile app?
|
|
|
|
|
Because we all need the flutter of the Chaos Butterfly wings to code - or are you still using "keyboards" and "mice"?
And it's best not to create cross apps at all: pleasant, happy ones are much easier to work with.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
what's flutter.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
Flutter - Wikipedia[^]
Aw, they prolly mean the "software" by Google. "Go Flutter!"
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Only if used with doohickey 1.0.2 and whatchamacallit 0.0.5
if you use the 1.1.0 version of doohickey, it'll break your code and render all mobile apps immobile.
but you can prevent that by applying patch 0.2 of the Alpha release of Thingy 2.4.1
Remember that if you also use thingummabob 1.0 RC it'll only work on Windows 12, and Android pre-2033 releases.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
But according to Microsoft pre release of Windows 12 it will only run on Quantum machine with the CB 2.0 upgrade.
CB = Chastity Belt
The less you need, the more you have.
Why is there a "Highway to Hell" and only a "Stairway to Heaven"? A prediction of the expected traffic load?
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: CB = Chastity Belt
What kind of computer needs a chastity belt? 
Asking for a friend. 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: What kind of computer needs a chastity belt?
To keep bad things from happening! It's TPM 3.0...kinda!
The less you need, the more you have.
Why is there a "Highway to Hell" and only a "Stairway to Heaven"? A prediction of the expected traffic load?
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
It was another utter Flutter failure.
(Say that fast 3 times)
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
I felt laravel was more perfect code to use for developing a pro mobile app than flutter. I say it from my experience of developing a doctor booking app.
|
|
|
|
|
(This post is being submitted under the protection afforded by Lounge posting rule #2.)
I read somewhere on this site that someone had written that it's bad practice to use "using namespace std;" in your C++ code.
Can anyone explain the theory behind this?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
A rather long discussion on SO[^]
|
|
|
|
|
It's definitely frowned on in a header file, where it's best to spell out names in full.
I also avoid it in a .cpp, but using declarations for frequently used items are OK in a .cpp. A using directive is for everything in a namespace (using namespace std), but a using declaration is for a specific item (using std::string or using std::ostream).
|
|
|
|
|
You're probably referring to this thread[^]. I only remember it because I made a flippant comment.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Can anyone explain the theory behind this?
Hi,
I can give you an example of why using-declarations should be avoided.
Sometime ago I was on a two-man team (Hello Andy !) working on the Delivery Optimization system service[^] which would debut with Windows 10 Threshold. The original code base was developed with VS2010 and 'using namespace boost' was sprinkled throughout much of our source code.
The first problem we encountered was that boost::chrono, boost::atomic, and boost:mutex conflicted with std::chrono, std::atmomic and std:mutex. There were a few other issues with std::thread but I can't remember them all. We spent several days (probably a week) refactoring our code.
When C++17 came around I had a similar problem with boost::filesystem conflicting with std::filesystem in other projects.
We eventually moved away from boost to the std namespace when the internal OS build system added support for C++11. Now days I just type the entire scope and avoid using-declarations.
|
|
|
|
|
Very interesting. I think I haven't worked on anything in C++ that's sufficiently complex to have had such a problem. But I thank you for taking the time to explain it.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah,
Shortly after I responded to your post I remembered some other details. I can remember that std::mutex and boost::mutex were nearly identical so I could seamlessly switch the code below from boost to the std namespace simply by changing the using-namespace declaration. It's a bit frightening when you discover three days later that you forgot to change a mutex in a few places.
mutex m;
m.lock();
m.unlock();
Can't make that mistake if you use the entire scope:
std::mutex m;
m.lock();
m.unlock();
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: Can't make that mistake if you use the entire scope:
care to elaborate?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
