|
Quality ingredients...My mother always tells this story if someone ask her how her cooking is so tasty...
It's about a neighbor come to ask her to lend some vegetable soup powder, but mum told she has none...So the neighbor asked, how than she makes vegetable soup? She told: you may not believe, but I'm using vegetables... 
As for the pie...I had eaten three different kinds, where the only common was the lamb...One made it with pure meat, the others added vegetables too, one different kinds of root and the other green-peas, fresh corn and the like...
All was tasty, but in a different way...
I made my with a lot of fresh tomatoes cooked with the meat nearly 6 hours...Onion and cumin and a bit of bit cinnamon and peppers of 4-season (white, black, red and green)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
The Royal College of Nursing has weighed in on Prime Minister David Cameron's health care proposals for the junior doctors in the National Health Service.
The Allergists voted to scratch it, but the Dermatologists advised not to make any rash moves.
The Gastroenterologists had a sort of a gut feeling about it, but the Neurologists thought the Administration had a lot of nerve.
The Obstetricians felt they were all labouring under a misconception.
Ophthalmologists considered the idea short-sighted.
Pathologists yelled, "Over my dead body!" while the Paediatricians said, "Oh, Grow up."
The Psychiatrists thought the whole idea was madness, while the Radiologists could see right through it.
The Surgeons were fed up with the cuts and decided to wash their hands of the whole thing.
The Ear Nose and Throat specialists didn't swallow it, and just wouldn't hear of it.
The Pharmacists thought it was a bitter pill to swallow, and the Plastic Surgeons said, "This puts a whole new face on the matter...."
The Podiatrists thought it was a step forward, but the Urologists were pissed off at the whole idea.
The Anaesthetists thought the whole idea was a gas, but the Cardiologists didn't have the heart to say no.
In the end, the Proctologists won out, leaving the entire decision up to the a*holes in Whitehall.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is all I have to say, nothing more to add...
Although.. I do wonder why people are still using Oracle! 
I mean, if you hate MS, why not use MySql instead?
|
|
|
|
|
Their stock sure is; it got a beat down today.
We have our main stuff on Oracle and it doesn't bother me, though I prefer SQL Server. Some of our smaller applications use SQL Server. My biggest complaints with Oracle is that it is very finicky compared to SQL Server, those cryptic error messages don't help much, and there are compatibility issues with previous versions of .Net and Oracle. Also, SQL Developer and Toad are horrible IDEs; which doesn't make development as much fun as SQL Server.
|
|
|
|
|
jgakenhe wrote: SQL Developer and Toad are horrible IDEs
Can't agree more. Oracle SQL Developer is leaking memory horribly. Every now and then it becomes unresponsive. Toad too has its own issue.. pretty unfriendly UI I would say.. 
Thanks,
Milind
|
|
|
|
|
Hate Oracle myself, but have to use it as some of our system aren't designed by the vendors on anything else.
There licensing rules on virtual machines and how many core are on the machine instead of how many you are using make it an expense pain in the *
|
|
|
|
|
Everytime I used Oracle I can't help but wonder "there are people who rave about Oracle? Who are those people!? "
|
|
|
|
|
People who don't know or tried anything else.
|
|
|
|
|
They are Oracle consultants who get very rich from people using Oracle.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't Oracle own MySQL these days?
|
|
|
|
|
For the same reason that MS has hardly ever lost business customers, no matter their antics: they have enough money to ensure continuance of service.
Ever since Db4, I've been wondering why more people don't write their own databases. It ain't rocket surgery -- and if you don't use sql, there ain't no sql injection.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I also hate Oracle.
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on SQLServer nowadays, but I would prefer Oracle.
I think it's a lot to do with on what system you learned SQL.
SQLServer is more forgiving than Oracle though, it's a bit like comparing VB with C#.
|
|
|
|
|
A few years ago I got saddled with having to work with Oracle and thought I would brush up on it (I had not used it in a decade). When I ran across an article by an Oracle DBA who praised Oracle for their requirement for all caps on TABLE AND FIELD names I ducked on the project. There are many things to dislike about Oracle but that was a deal breaker.
Oh yeah and the POS Toad is another one.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: When I ran across an article by an Oracle DBA who praised Oracle for their requirement for all caps on TABLE AND FIELD names I ducked on the project.
There is no such requirement, default behaviour is case insensitive. If you want them case sensitive you need to wrap them in double quotes "", same as [] on SQLServer.
Personally I find the limit of 30 characters for Table and Column names a lot worse.
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: I mean, if you hate MS, why not use MySql instead?
MySql is also owned by Oracle! 
I'm actually surprised that it still exists and is free and open source. I would have thought that Oracle would have either retired it or made it a paid product by now. 
And seriously, after having worked with MySql: It's crap too! I would never, ever use it myself in a production system. It's a Mickey Mouse database system that is good for nothing but small homemade websites with minimal database requirements! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
modified 3-Jun-16 3:14am.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree , for me I have a lot of time for Postgres - bit of a learning curve if you're from MS background but worth the effort.
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Well MySQL, Postgress, SQLite, blahblah, I am easy!
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: It's a Mickey Mouse database system that is good for nothing but small homemade websites with minimal database requirements!
Have you told Google?
|
|
|
|
|
If I did that, I would get a Disney lawsuit on my hands faster than you can say "Goofy"!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
My company uses a lot of Oracle.
Luckily I'm in the SQL Server team.
Just this week a coworker from another team said to me "SQL Server is not a real database."
I replied "For a not-database it has awesome tooling compared to the much more expensive Oracle."
His mouth disagreed, but I'm pretty sure his heart knew I was right 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes! that! 
I rather work with "Not a database" which is awesome than a so called "real database" that can only be used remotely close to 10% efficiency by "real DBA"
|
|
|
|
|
My business partner asked me earlier this week about a code generator tool that would allow her (mostly a non-programmer) to build prototype/poc web applications using a click-and-drag type of interface. I immediately responded with 'ironspeed' remembering that for a long time they were a sponsor here. Little did I know that they are now defunct due to a lawsuit.  To my credit, September of last year, when this made news, was a rough time work-wise, so I wouldn't have been reading too much news! Oh, the irony!  (Sorry, not funny...)
Anyway, she found an alternative (not free but not unreasonable either) with asprunner.net.
I haven't heard of them before now and apparently, she will be using it to start work on a project we discussed last week which I dismissed as not being feasible given the development resources available (me)...So, it seems she is replacing one code generating tool for another! One that doesn't talk back.
So, joking aside, has anybody here seen this product (asprunner.net) or the generated output thereof? If so, I hope it allows tweaking as I am sure to become responsible for it in the future. 
Who knows? It could be a good thing...
Edit: I've just noticed that this post was marked as abusive/spam and got dinged for it. If someone could tell me what statement here is abusive, I'd sure like to know. For the individual(s) who complained, fuadiaf...
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
modified 6-Jun-16 9:19am.
|
|
|
|
|
kmoorevs wrote: I hope it allows tweaking as I am sure to become responsible for it in the future.
See, this is why you, as a human code generator, cannot be replaced by a robotic code generator.
Never used asprunner.net, but their website doesn't same anything about support on mobile devices (that I noticed.)
kmoorevs wrote: Little did I know that they are now defunct due to a lawsuit.
Patent troll. Where's that gun? 
Marc
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
