|
Just started a new C# class, and pasted in some code: "File" class wasn't known. Not a problem - put the cursor in the word, and a blue line appears at the beginning, so all I need to do is hover the mouse over it, and ....  where's my blue line? It's gawn!
Now it's part of the right click menu, under "Resolve", and only appears if you type the name, not if you paste it in...
When did that change?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
The moment you were grabbing your coat. Now I guess its my time!
Before that, it is back in Visual Studio 2015, as a "Light Bulb[^]". 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Surprised it took you this long to notice.
Your special OG build randomly adds and removes features from VS.
Oh yeah, they included it in Win10 as well. Randomly making files read-only, messing with monitors, etc.
Seriously though, the only thing I noticed with VS2013 was that they switched the suggestions icon from right to left.
Or maybe that's only in my head.
I've been using ctrl + . for the last few months anyway 
|
|
|
|
|
When they heard you were comfortable with the old way, they figured it was time for a change. 
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
I know the voices in my head are not real but damn they come up with some good ideas!
|
|
|
|
|
And I've just noticed that the "Resolve" menu option doesn't appear with undeclared methods - but the blue line does... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't worked with VS2013 in a while but I kinda like the Resolve thing, but you're right it doesn't play well with undeclared methods.
Been working with Atmel Studio for my embedded stuff more lately, when I finally got done with finishing my sons house and moving.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
I know the voices in my head are not real but damn they come up with some good ideas!
|
|
|
|
|
I get the feeling that MS has got too big, and there is no-one with a sufficient overview of any project to say "Let's be consistent here!" for anything. VS shows it, Win10 shows it...look at "pre-Ribbon" software and you felt that it was "together" in a way that the newer stuff just doesn't, unfortunately. (Even if it thankfully doesn't have a ribbon)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
There has never been any consistency, each group was an island within the company and each one did things their way instead of working together.
Win10 is an OS done their way and they listened just enough that it could be pushed out the door with the attitude...we'll fix it as we go along...SSDD or in this case SSDOS.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
I know the voices in my head are not real but damn they come up with some good ideas!
|
|
|
|
|
I dunno - you used to get the feeling that one group worked on one project. Now I get the feeling that a dozen different groups work on VS, and the several C++ groups won't talk to the half-dozen C# groups, who try to sabotage the WPF groups, who ...
Yeuch.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I dunno - you used to get the feeling that one group worked on one project. Now I get the feeling that a dozen different groups work on VS, and the several C++ groups won't talk to the half-dozen C# groups, who try to sabotage the WPF groups, who ...
They must have reduced the size of the break rooms?
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
I know the voices in my head are not real but damn they come up with some good ideas!
|
|
|
|
|
I never even heard of VS 2013 until Friday when it turned out that my new boss has it installed and we were unable to install the SSDT-BI templates for VS 2012. 
|
|
|
|
|
I had heard that MS was going to "try" to adopt some of Resharper's capabilities and features, starting with VS2013, and a lot in 2015. This could be a first attempt?
|
|
|
|
|
This made my day: 
http://9gag.com/gag/azV5j2q?ref=fbp[^]
Meanwhile python grabs a popcorn ...
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Carl von Clausewitz
Source
|
|
|
|
|
They are both wrong: it should be Whitesmiths... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I used to do Whitesmiths but then I joined the Allman clan (mainly, I think, after starting to do more SQL) and never looked back.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
ΑlphaΔeltaΘheta wrote: Meanwhile python grabs a popcorn ...
Visual Basic begins a salted popcorn 
|
|
|
|
|
void YeahWell()
{
ThisIsRight = true;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look[^]
Really, Google?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a more perfect solution then I suggest you tell Google and make yourself a fortune. I don't see anything in this for which Google should feel in the least bit ashamed. The automated system did its job and the mechanism exists to appeal decisions before humans. But, of course, you don't get the Internet glory hit if you just follow the procedures.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, let me reword it then: google could stop kowtowing to Big Content.
|
|
|
|
|
If they were happy to break the law and endure yet more hassle and multimillion fines from the EU, yes, I suppose they could.
|
|
|
|
|
If they just kept the old system of manually reviewing DMCA requests then there's no law broken, just effort spend. It would be more expensive for them obviously, but youtube would have been a better place for it.
They could have made it harder to file the requests to compensate. Ban automated scripts and such.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, I got really confused by Playboy, thinking they meant Gameboy...
My mom still plays Tetris on my old Gameboy. Uhhh... I hope that's actually Gameboy 
|
|
|
|
|
Titties on Playboy.
Tetris on Gameboy.
It's not that hard until it is.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
