|
Big
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Wizard of ID[^]
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
The boss is a fink!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course it's a 64-bit processor. I have that very one in my rig.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
So where does it say that at? Other processors that I've looked at have that piece of info right in the description, or at least on the specs page.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it might not have it on the Newegg page, but I'm sure you could find it on the AMD site.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: ...the AMD site.
Yeah, I went there, too.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe AMD stopped to put it on front page since the last 32 bit AMD processor was the K7 in 1999...
In any case, the keyword you should look for is AMD64...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
How about under "Specifications", where it says:
64-Bit Support: Yes
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
You really have to go out of your way to get a 32-bit processor these days. If you did it by accident, you'd be wondering why you're paying $10 for a processor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ofcourse, you can read it nearly the end.
You need for that CPU also an outstanding motherboard and big power supply.
I have the FX-8370: it is a hammer. 
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, why worry?
You'll never need more than an 8-bit processor and 637k of memory, so stop fretting.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
.. how,exactly, is it enforced?
|
|
|
|
|
I am unable to say! 
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Punches you on the ear* 
|
|
|
|
|
Never underestimate the power of social control 
|
|
|
|
|
Step into my office then we can talk about that
*Leads you into a dark damp windowless room with no lights, and as the door closes there is a distinct overwhelmed smell of blood, sweat and a whole lot of Peroxide.*
Nothing to see here people, move along
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Is it just me or does the "remember me" checkbox on logins work less and less these days? Websites, mobile apps that use credentials, everything. It's bizarre.
I have a stock-standard setup of Windows 10 and iOS 9.3 with no blockers or cookie cleaners.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed the same, but for me it works fine on some websites and not on others. Seems to me it has to do with the coding of that particular web page?
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: does the "remember me" checkbox on logins work less
Who said that?
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they don't want to remember you.
What have you done to make them want to forget?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
