|
Thank goodness, wasn't sure if I was just going crazy or misreading the question 
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
I used Windows Movie Maker (on XP, no less!) to make these[^] slideshow videos with a background audio track and credits.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Nice, I want something just like that. I don't have a lot of time though. Lots of stuff to do and I have a deadline.
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think Zero has the matter in hand, he's going to ask Putin to please not go any further, that should do it! 
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
|
|
|
|
|
The fact that a country has to come out and state they are not starting World War Three is a little scary to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed: one wonders what they are not telling us!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't panic - he's the Prime Minister of the UK and there are two reasons why he would make such a statement:
1) We can't afford WWIII at the moment.
2) He's up for re-election next year and doesn't think being responsible blowing up most of the world will improve his standing in the polls...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure which polls he's worried about. Let's not forget, this is a man who's:
He's obviously targeting the "we hate the Internet, but we love magic and other nonsense" vote. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: He's obviously targeting the "we hate the Internet, but we love magic and other nonsense" vote.
Indeed. The same demographic that DD is after: conservatives. 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Richard Deeming wrote: He's obviously targeting the "we hate the Internet, but we love magic and other nonsense" vote.
Indeed. The same demographic that DD is after: conservatives.
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
I would agree with you but then we both would be wrong.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I'm not sure which polls he's worried about
The ones that are stealing our jobs?
Richard Deeming wrote: rushed through "emergency" laws[^] to force ISPs and telcos to store records of everything that their customers do, despite the ECJ ruling that this retention was illegal;
Seriously though, I don't know why this is seen as bad. The person we democratically voted in(sort of) made a law and we are moaning because the ECJ (who we didn't democratically elect) declares it illegal. Surely we should be standing up for the person we elect to be able to make changes?
|
|
|
|
|
So next year, when Nige and pals take over, and they revoke the Race Relations Act so they can get away with their racist rants, we should support those actions because we "sort-of" elected them? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
My point is that you were trying to say that DC did something wrong by going against what the ECJ had deemed illegal. But DC was elected by us whereas the ECJ wasn't.
If Nigel is elected at least you have the opportunity to oppose him.
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't trying to suggest that I thought it was wrong because of the ECJ ruling. More that I think it's wrong, and the ECJ ruling supports that idea.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: He's obviously targeting the "we hate the Internet, but we love magic and other nonsense" vote.
Wait, you're basically accusing DC of being a hippy.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a programmer working in a small 7-man team of developers for a web design studio. We work in PHP/Symfony2 (rant for another day) and use Atlassian's JIRA ticket system for tracking issues.
We also use it for logging time. 
This being the first job I've had in which time logging has been mandatory (log all work, log 7.5 hours per day) I'm finding it to be a huge obstacle to my productivity. A train of thought is a fragile thing, and stopping after every little thing (sending an e-mail, making a Git commit) to log the time I've spent on it and what I did is proving to be very effective at derailing it. Couple this with the pressure to get 7.5 hours logged on something or other every single day and I'm actually starting to dread coming to work in the morning.
Not only this, we now have a completely redundant physical whiteboard full of sticky-notes representing JIRA tickets/issues that must be kept in-sync with the digital system. By hand.
We're such a small team, we're all in the same room. But every time we want to fix an issue we need to:
- Go to JIRA, mark the issue as 'In Progress'.
- Stand up, walk over the the whiteboard and move the sticky-note to the 'In Progress' column.
- Sit back down, fix the issue.
- Go to JIRA, log the time spent on the issue and write a short description of what has been changed.
- Mark the issue as 'Ready for Review'.
- Stand up again,
 walk over to the whiteboard and move the sticky-note to the 'Ready for Review' column.
- Go back to JIRA again and message the QA guys that there's a new sticky note in the 'Ready for Review' column.
I stress again, we're a 7-man web development team trying to be time-efficient, fast and agile. Everyone's practically going crazy about how everything takes too long. Part of it's to do with the bulky toolset we're using, but it baffles me that we can't slim down the ridiculous admin and let the developers do what they do best without having to watch the clock all the time.
So what's the verdict? Am I a crybaby or is this genuinely as silly as it all seems?
modified 2-Aug-18 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll probably find that this is more for whoever is bankrolling your development efforts so they can get an idea of how their money is being spent
Pain in the ass? Definitely, but it's probably keeping you employed, at least until the thing you are building starts to justify itself
Just a thought
|
|
|
|
|
That is all fouled up. Seriously? The board o doom is not meant to be such a chore. Ditching the manual board will be a great start.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a real PITA.
What you might do is estimate the time spent doing the BS as opposed to actual work and submit it to the bosses. I would imagine if the time spent on BS is large enough they will find a way to slim it down?
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
|
|
|
|
|
Log the time spent on logging the time and determine a percentage of total time spent. Of course, you have to log the time of logging the time and it becomes recursive.
I'm not a programmer but I play one at the office
|
|
|
|
|
Lilith.C wrote: Log the time spent on logging the time and determine a percentage of total time spent. Of course, you have to log the time of logging the time and it becomes recursive.
Exactly, then there's the time going to the coffee machine and those times when team members want to come in and talk about nothing but just interesting enough to totally distract you...well you get the picture.
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
|
|
|
|
|
The board is just plain stupid. If someone (manager?) wants to see what everyone is working on when he enters the room he can but large TV and hook it up with agile JIRA dashboard - should be cheaper in a month or two considering all your trips to the board.
As for the JIRA itself.. well.. there have to be some kind of tracking where the money goes. The problem may start if client can see it as it may be sometimes hard to explain why what they see (!) as simple change took 3 days.
--
"My software never has bugs. It just develops random features."
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like a terrible waste of time and effort. Have you considered logging the time spent on logging? That may result in a one way trip to the ext door or it may communicate that this is an inefficient process.
I may not last forever but the mess I leave behind certainly will.
|
|
|
|
|
I once worked for a company that briefly wanted me to log everything in 15 minute increments and submit the log weekly. After the first week I turned my log in and my boss appeared in my office shortly thereafter. Seems he wanted to know why I had 4 hours logged as "logging time" for the week. I asked if he actually knew how long it took to check your watch every few minutes to see if 15 minutes had gone by, then write down what you did for that 15 minutes, then transcribe and summarize it at the end of a week.
They trashed the time logging after I explained the process to a few coworkers.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
