|
Kevin Marois wrote: They've finally screwed up my pay... Mailed me a check and then direct deposited TWCIE the amount the following week... I was paid TWCIE for the same week.
I fail to see what the problem is... 
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
Right?
The extra money is sitting in savings earning (a tiny bit of) interest until they take it back.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: out of Boston
Well, that certainly narrows it down. 
I think I have an idea for a time-keeping system. Have everyone make a CP membership and tell HR the name. Every morning, log into CP and post an "I'm here" message in your personal forum, then add replies as the day goes along -- out for lunch, back from lunch, etc. HR can then scrape everyone's entries to get the punches. Simple. 
|
|
|
|
|
"Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted."
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Old quote:
'Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement'.
|
|
|
|
|
Right now reading this book about Neuron Network in C#[^], yeah! 
Ok, I have to say it does help me go into a subject which has always been nebulously mysterious until thus far, so.. it must be good right?
On the other hand the book is somewhat obscure (luckily I am very keen to understand WTF is going on!!), it is riddled with very average programming and... really really poor math!
I mean where in the world the derivative of 1 / (1 + exp(-x)) is even remotely related x * (1 - x) ?!?
Well in the book that's where[^]!!  
|
|
|
|
|
If you pick x as Sigmoid(actualX) it's fine
|
|
|
|
|
not sure what you mean...
far from 0 this function is approximate to (const) 1, hence its derivative is approximately 0, and it its integration function (not sure of English name) would be x (is it what you mean?).
but:
1. x is the approximation of the .. integration (? not sure of name), not the derivative
2. -x^2 != x, where -x^2 is the value he suggest
3. -d^2 + d (the value he suggest) has 0s for x = 0,1, 1/(1=exp(-x))'s derivative has no 0, i.e. it behave very differently
[EDIT]
Ho, I just got it!
You suggest I could use (x) as activation function, right?
No worries, it's even in the book!
You just confused me with your terse off topic answer! 
modified 12-Aug-15 10:44am.
|
|
|
|
|
If that sigmoid thing is s(x) = 1/(1 + exp(-x)) then its derivative is s(x) * (1 - s(x))
So either the author of that code was confused and mixed his x's and s(x)'s, or it's correct but used in a way that is not immediately obvious from that implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
Ho... I see...
what a strange notation hey!
And from the book so far it's not obvious that is what was needed!
Thanks, might help me in my deciphering more of the book tonight!
|
|
|
|
|
I found out the guy right next to me at my new job is on codeproject. Not sure his username.
Elephant elephant elephant, sunshine sunshine sunshine
|
|
|
|
|
loctrice wrote: Not sure his username.
That illegal key logger not doing its full job then ... ?
|
|
|
|
|
Guessing as soon as the keylogger picked up "give code plzzzz", loctrice turned it off in disgust
|
|
|
|
|
Try and get him to casually bring it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe he is not logged on, and only lurks.
YOU HAVE A STALKER !!!
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
There's a mirror, right next to you...
|
|
|
|
|
|
No on speaking terms - yet...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
If he talked to him and asked, they would be.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure I want him to know who I am.
Yeah, he can just find out by searching I guess.
Elephant elephant elephant, sunshine sunshine sunshine
|
|
|
|
|
loctrice wrote:
I'm not sure I want him to know who I am. |
That is the reason I use a fake handle. Anonymity is nice, sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
Me too, but I thought I had my name on my profile. Turns out I don't.
Elephant elephant elephant, sunshine sunshine sunshine
|
|
|
|
|
Tell him you're implementing a hotel booking system and need the codes urgently, then shoulder-surf his account login.
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't know we hired a new one?
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably nobody really cares...
Try punching him in the face instead... find out if he trains UFC.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
