|
Forogar wrote: You need to be prepared to learn something for a lifespan of 1 to 5 years
I started programming C in 1987 or 88 and was still doing it professionally when I left my last company in 2006. In the intervening 10 years I have done some more for fun. Similar story for Java, although I did not start using it until the late 90s.
|
|
|
|
|
I was also doing C in 1987-ish. I still do some occasionally. I also did some Java as well in the late 90s - but not very much as I was doing a lot of C++ instead at the time. I have been doing C# since version 1.0 and am still doing it.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that hybrid apps are the future for simple app, but when it gets tricky you need native support.
Because I know C# good I would stick to Xamarin.
Objective-C can be tricky, but also simple and very powerful. It is often the problem to find the right way. I like diving into the Apple sample code and dig into Stackoverflow. The biggest mess is the Interface Builder. 
Best to choose is:
1. what YOU really like or
2. if you have an interesting job opportunity.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Every skill set you learn will become obsolete. This is a fact. Embrace it.
Any skill set may hang in there for decades, but it will dwindle in market share (e.g., jobs will become fewer and fewer), and you will be best served by learning something new. In fact you should make it a point to learn something new every year.
Like others, I've been coding for decades. I dug out my "comprehensive" resume and laughed at the number of things I learned and completely forgot about. As we gain experience, the tools and technologies become less important, while the skills we learn and breadth of experience we gain come to the fore.
Look at the experienced people -- we don't get hired because we're the best programmer in "X" (whatever X is). Some kid out of college will know X better than we do. We get hired because we solve problems in an effective and timely manner.
[I like working with new grads, they have an infectious enthusiasm, but little experience. I teach them while they teach me.  ]
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely no reason you need to learn Objective C to program iOS. Almost all new tutorials that are coming out now are in Swift, which is a fantastic language.
You don't need an iPhone, but if you do want a device, an iPad mini is pretty cheap. All you need at the start is a Mac mini or similar.
If you are trying to get a job, Swift is much newer than Objective C therefore there is less competition. As it is way better, companies will migrate to Swift pretty quickly creating demand.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
I'm an Objective-C developer who recently started to learn Swift; I don't see any reason why you need Objective-C at all. Most of the frameworks, if not all, have been Swift-ified by now. On SO most newer answers contain Swift rather than Obj-C. Apple tutorials example code is in both Swift and Obj-C, and most new tutorials coming out are Swift only.
As for devices, I'm pretty sure you can get some 2nd-hand ones for reasonable prices. Nice thing about Apple hardware is the quality is exceptional, and I've seen many threads here where people mention developing (for Windows) on 5 - 10-year-old MacBookPros and similar.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Apple tutorials example code is in both Swift and Obj-C
That's debatable.
i cri evry tiem
|
|
|
|
|
I kid you not!
Search Apple's tutorials and framework documentation. There's a tab at the top of every code example that gives you the option to view it as Objective-C or Swift. I was amazed!
Okay, maybe not all the old documentation, but most of what's new or updated.
|
|
|
|
|
But not for long.
After 8 years, 6 months, and a few weeks I am going to be leaving this place tomorrow.
Spent the afternoon packing up all my personal stuff, got to come in tomorrow morning for an exit interview, and then down the pub at lunchtime to indulge those who think they shall miss me.
Most of those I shall miss have left over the years, moved on to other jobs, or died, the people in charge have changed and things have not changed for the better.
I am very much ready to not be working here anymore.
The biggest thing I shall miss, as I realised this morning, is taking my daughter to school. At the moment I am able to drop her off at 9 then get to work around half past. It has been that way since she started school around seven and a half years ago. Today was the last time I shall do that until I don't know when as I shall be leaving home around 7 in the morning from now on.
None of this is interesting, but I have nothing else to do now.
Not quite true, I'm still waiting for them to do the testing on the final bit of development I have done so it can go live.
They're cutting it a bit fine.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Well if they don't get round to it for a few more days, you can fix it at contractor's rates! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I understand you.
I was in the same situation 1 1/2 years ago after being in the same place for exactly 10 years.
And just like you seem to feel now, I did not have any regrets leaving the place as most of the people I cared about had already left and the company was getting more and more worse...
...I never looked back, and never regretted leaving.
I wish you all the best, you close a chapter and open a new one.
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
Their loss! And ... you're probably getting paid more to boot!
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats to the new job !
chriselst wrote: I shall be leaving home around 7 in the morning from now on
Because you got to get earlier there, or because it is further away from home ?
|
|
|
|
|
A bit of both.
And a lot of what Oz suggested.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Crap. Thought you were starting a little poem.
Here I sit, broken hearted
Tried to sh!t
But only farted.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
..which is so much more helpful and logical than using the systems' settings..
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I think that I must have inherited my work PC from a previous user without being wiped first and thusly inherited their settings. 
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Oracle should not have the setting in the first place; there is a system setting.
Especially for the developer of a database-server, I'd expect that they'd at least know how idiotic it would be if you had to keep each setting per application for each workstation.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Oracle should not have the setting in the first place; there is a system setting.
I'm not arguing with that point. From a database development perspective, the only thing a user should have to be concerned with is 'Do I have the right connection string?' and 'Do I have the necessary permissions?'
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
This is why they invented ISO 8601.  Can't we all just use YYYY-MM-DD ?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably for the same reasons you can't get Americans to use the metric system.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Americans?
I still can't think in litres, kilos, and kilometres, and I've been living in continental Europe for the past fifteen years!
Can't blame 'em for not using the metric system when everyone around them is not using it, too.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The metric system is used in much of America; it's only one largely insignificant portion of North America where you'll find the most hold-outs.
|
|
|
|
|
Hardly sporting to blame the database because somebody, at some point, made the dumb-assed decision to allow for implicit data conversion - passing a string literal and assuming that nobody would ever change environment settings.
Always, always, always, always use an explicit format mask for data conversions from string to date.
Did I mention "always"?
It's not hard.
you don't:
WHERE yourDatefield = :your_parameter --fingers crossed and hope it works!
Instead:
WHERE yourDatefield = TO_DATE(:your_parameter, 'YYYY/MM/DD') -- or whatever your string is formatted as.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)