|
Oh well then, I didn't understand a bean about it! Ideas sprouting like this can be confusing. Lettuce consider it further.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm lactose intolerant, so best not take this further.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't stand those bluddy lactoses, either; ccming over here and stealing our jobs!
Send 'em back to Lactvia, I say!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, totally agree, take that sh*t somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
|
Dsmned straight!
I'm from Portsmouth; we don' need no steenkin' Lactoses or paediatricians!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
You know what they say, give people beer, and they will have children... or something.
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: Why?
Somebody got 8-9 upvotes for suggesting a thread get moved to the Soapbox the other day, so expect loads trying the same in the long quest for more upvotes. 
|
|
|
|
|
You're just trying to cause trouble! Take it to the soapbox!
(The little arrow on the left, Guys!)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That maybe was a valid observation for the last week, but since than Trump had a few public statements (and an other not so public)...so maybe the balance moved...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a valid observation about how to spell the plural of "potato", and how to spell "realise"
I never said that Thought of Last Week would be easy...
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: I never said that Thought of Last Week would be easy...
Neither it will last for this week 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Speakest thou the bleeding obvious!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Pass me a bread knife!
Here you are[^] - happy eunuchs development 
Espen Harlinn
Chief Architect - Powel AS
Projects promoting programming in "natural language" are intrinsically doomed to fail. Edsger W.Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
Now all I need is a circus!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody is an idiot like Trump
it ain’t broke, it doesn’t have enough features yet.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to be in the news over the last few days.
Here is NASA's take: Hypothetical 'Planet X' - Overview [^]
Fascinating stuff, once you ignore the hype in some of the tabloids.
|
|
|
|
|
It is a sad fact that journalists are unable to report science. Then again scientists are not the worlds greatest communicators.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Also, at least they can't call it Uranus... 
|
|
|
|
|
Not so fascinating - no content on Chrome here...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I know it's an astronomy site, but black background...?
Is the capital of this new planet Geocities?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Call me cynical, but it does seem a little convenient that all this started close to the completion of the last major planetary* exploration mission when there really ceased to be any obvious reason to launch any more in the foreseeable future. And it beggars belief that, at a time when we're picking out planets in star systems 1000s of light years distant with some of the most powerful telescopes in history floating around in orbit as well as on the ground, that we might have missed one in our own backyard.
* I think it was still a planet when the mission launched anyway.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
This Sixty Symbols video[^] gives a short explanation of why it cannot be seen(at 0:53). In short it's because it is so far away.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
GuyThiebaut wrote: n short it's because it is so far away.
I think I'm entitled to say a skeptical "yeah, right" to that. As the speaker himself admits that's going to be an increasingly thin excuse if there's no 'sighting' in a relatively short time. I'll be more than happy to be proven wrong, of course.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
GuyThiebaut wrote: In short it's because it is so far away.
That explanation would only work if they are postulating that Planet X is significantly farther away than Sedna, but they are only placing it slightly farther away than Sedna. Sedna is smaller than Pluto (and we have observed it), and they are claiming this planet is as large as Neptune.
|
|
|
|
|
NASA has to announce the existance of Planet "X" a Comet Planet, soon, as earth based observations have confirmed. Just before Comet Impact (on Mars) happened or nuclear weapons were launched, a Group of Alien (Martian) heirarchy, escaped in a Spacecraft. They could have visited Earth in the past and knew that it could support life. There is observable evidence to support Planet X, inline the moon landing hoax.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
