|
pkfox wrote: Easy peasy
That is what you always say. 
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
No hints, Mr. Easy Peasy?
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Is that from "Peterman" being the name for a safecracker?
Don't get the "talk to him" bit though?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
No it's just Peter is a safe - I probably should have made it: "Is it safe to talk about him"
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
modified 30-May-16 10:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
pkfox wrote: The answer is Peter
But what's the solution?
|
|
|
|
|
Peter is a safe
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
... and a fox. 
|
|
|
|
|
I thought 'peter' and very nearly committed it to paper (or whatever it is we're supposed to call this virtual stuff we're typing on, into, over). But then I dismissed it as just silly! No comment on your clue, obviously (and if you believe that .... )
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
I use \d*000$ for a multiple of 1000..
I am searching for a code of multiples of 250 and 500
|
|
|
|
|
You could, for instance, try harder to hit the right forum... 
|
|
|
|
|
 Yes i am going to
|
|
|
|
|
Try asking here: http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/ask.aspx[^]
But please try to give more detail of exactly what you are trying to achieve: the language you are using, perhaps some sample code...we can't read your mind!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your kind words. The post is already on an other forum. Have a nice day too
|
|
|
|
|
Just google "unwanted starbucks outlets per 50sq ml".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Because I did, and I have to agree with the Grauniad: Top Gear: Chris Evans and Matt LeBlanc launch new series – as it happened | Television & radio | The Guardian[^]
It wasn't very good.
It's a new series, with a completely new cast, so I expected the first episode to be a cracker - the best they could do to drag us all into the series. And it wasn't, it was a struggle to watch all the way through. I tried to like it. I really did. But not one giggle; not one smirk; definitely no laughs escaped me. It's like the crew of the Original Top Gear (when it was a car show) had tried to take it back instead of keeping it as a comedy show with cars. Sad.
Will I watch episode two? No, probably not...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't got it here yet, but will try to watch it when it does arrive.
They must be delivering it by boat 
|
|
|
|
|
So, more or less like expected?
|
|
|
|
|
Not really - I was expecting the first episode under "new management" to be "WOW! Gotta watch this!" purely to "drag viewers in" to watching the rest of the series. Top Gear is important to the BBC - it brings in a lot of money worldwide, it's the biggest selling program they have - so I'd have thought they would have pulled out all the stops.
Instead, it just came over as a "car show with sad jokes"
Even "star in a reasonably priced car" was damaged by adding a "rally section" that did little but spray mud all over the rest of the track...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I remember they messed things up on the old show from time to time as well, like the trip to India, a big letdown. Should perhaps wait a couple of shows before pulling the trigger on your remote 
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Haugland wrote: like the trip to India, a big letdown
It was OK, not as good as some, but watchable.
|
|
|
|
|
Seeing as getting a giggle and a smirk got them into trouble in the first place! A lot of places are just too PC for their own good. There is/was and Oz version, 5th Gear I think, that is a serious car show, dull as dishwater.
At some point they will realise that petrol heads generally have a rather low and crude sense of humour.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the clips I've seen Matt LeBlanc seems great and a natural, but Chris Evans seems horribly, even embarrassingly, miscast.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, it may have been bearable without Evans being himself.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
