|
He's always been Nigel Farright!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Well that's what the media says so it must be true 
I came into this game for the action, the excitement. Go anywhere, travel light, get in, get out, wherever there's trouble, a man alone. Now they got the whole country sectioned off, you can't make a move without a form.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope: it's Nigel Ravage
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Not according to auto-correct, it's Nigel farrago.
|
|
|
|
|
I realise this is dangerously close to a coding question - but opinions wanted: is it a smell to have a lookup table in your database that mirrors an enumerated type in your code?
(like e.g. Currencies)
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: I realise this is dangerously close to a coding question
Don't worry about that - the rules have gone out the window today.
|
|
|
|
|
Personally? No, I can see it being useful - provided there is some system to keep them both up to date.
I can see it helping if the DB is to be used from a number of applications, too.
It's the "up to date" bit that's the major headache.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - we may have to create a system that generates the reference data from the enumerated types (using attributes to link to the tables) as part of the build process. Feels a bit "icky".
|
|
|
|
|
The advantage of it (once it's all working) is that you can set the columns that use it as a foreign key so your DB can't hold invalid values. Worth a bit of "ickiness"? 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: Feels a bit "icky".
That is a fairly concise definition of a code smell right there, at least when talking about code. Just saying.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
We all know the answer to this one:
It depends.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That's your answer for everything 
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
You are wrong. 
That is liquid nitrogen
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Not 42?
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
That's the answer for a concrete question, not the answer for all questions
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: I realise this is dangerously close to a coding question
Not at all. It's a technical discussion which is encouraged in the Lounge and is greatly appreciated.
I have done it before but mostly to make writing the code a little bit easier, not having to remember what the exact values were that I was looking up. Sometimes it's easier to let Intellisense do the dirty work.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Ofcourse: what is if something is changing? Mostly adding or changing a type.
At least you need some robust error handling with a clear message what to do.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Saved me the effort of finding my article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do that often enough, and I don't like it, but it's necessary.
I often use have a method that verifies that the DB and enum match. Better than nothing, especially while developing, and the enum can change. If I don't do that, I put in a SCREAMING COMMENT that the enum and DB lookup table must match.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
No, but you're looking at it backward.
You should have such a table in your database, so you can have referential integrity and such.
Then you may define an enumerated type that matches it, to serve the same function in your code.
Having a technique to generate that enumerated type from the database (before or at compile time) is a rather simple task.
I did it my way:
GenOmatic[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
So we have Brexeted but I have the feeling this is not done by a long shot because Scotland that has an elected body both came down on the stay side. Now the important WTF am I doing I type a couple of nicely worded Emails and sent them to the opposite companies so ' Dear Company A' was sent to company B and 'Dear Company B' was sent to company A! 
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe, just maybe, you should take a little break from the pub?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
