|
Swinkaran wrote: So, what is going to happen for those who is loosing the jobs because of their role is replaced with a machine?
Nothing. Until the unions start complaining, then: not enough, and with the wrong solution. Probably the same old trick, pour billions of public money into the creation of artificial jobs (naturally, fewer than were lost) that no one wants to have and don't have to be done.
I see no reason why the govt won't simply repeat the mistakes that it has made in the past. That's kind of their thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Swinkaran wrote: Universal basic income is something I never thought of.....
But who pays for it when the only people employed are the ones making the machines that result in unemployment?
UBI is at best a stopgap measure on the way to a society (or world) sufficiently automated that one's needs are taken care of by the automation, not by UBI. I realize that is a "far far away, in another galaxy" concept, and with a lot of misery, probably war, definitely terrorism, and a significant reduction in personal freedoms, including the freedom to bear children, along the way. If we actually ever get there.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I like your pessimism, since I share it!
We could tax the one owning the asset? But looks like it's not gonna happen. While the 20th century was the most democratic century of all history, looks like oligarchy is making a come back in the 21st.
Really the future looks... interesting...
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dunno like the concept of UBI... I believe it is good for the economy at large (as opposed to the few richest).
But where will the money come from? All western government are starved for cash and could certainly not finance UBI on the back of the middle class, which is getting poorer and is the only one really taxed...
(poor have no money, rich are taxed less and less)
As for the demonetisation (as in a link inside your link) it's happening. But much less slowly that than he believes, I am pretty sure...
|
|
|
|
|
And or years I've be saying; "...every time you use self checkout you're taking a job from someone...". If a human doesn't take my money I don't shop at that place...period!
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
A mate of mine wouldn't use a parking garage unless it had human attendants.
He doesn't get a choice, any more.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
One of the largest monthly expenditures is housing. For Universal Basic Income to work, individuals need to live in areas where housing is relatively affordable; to a large extent, that excludes most major cities. I grew up in Ontario, Canada in a city of between 50,000 and 60,000, so not necessarily a 'major' city, but significant. And, if I read the city's online newspaper, I regularly see articles about how housing in not affordable. So, if you have a 'guaranteed income', but you use 1/2 of it for housing, you don't have enough to pay your utilities, groceries, transportation, etc...
So... you have to move to a 'minor' community to find affordable housing. Oh, wait, now the nearest grocery store is now an hour away by car - no public transit available.
And who is paying for all of this? The government? No... taxes are - from people who are striving to improve their lives and businesses who getting tired of being overtaxed and shift to less expensive regions.
And universal health care? I needed an 'emergency' MRI - I had to wait 3 months because there was a lack of MRI facilities due to funding...
There is no free lunch.
|
|
|
|
|
One problem with ABI is that markets will quickly adjust to those levels. (Like how college tuition at non-elite schools usual "just happens to" match the maximum Pell Grant amount.)
|
|
|
|
|
...or tried to.. and got This[^]
I always knew that CP place was suspicious 
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeeze, that cloud storage thing where you stored the picture is even more suspicious.
I lost count at around the 130th redirect, and, I mean, 30-odd seconds to load a screenshot?
I wouldn't go near that place again, if I were you, and I certainly wouldn't store anything personal, private, or business-critical on it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It's OneDrive
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: It's OneDrive
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid
Hey, how did you uncover the ms mission statement?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
There's an on-going battle between AVG and the Hamsters to get that false-positive removed:
AVG Virus Warning for CodeProject article[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Use a different anti-virus product.
AVG are showing false positives - and only if you view via Chrome or Edge. IE, Safari, Firefox and Opera are fine. I'll let you puzzle over that one.
I've contacted them but nothing after the initial "sure we'll whitelist you". I'm fairly pissed off at this point. It's all about them being seen to be "protecting" their customers and less about ensuring they are accurate.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Would it help it CPians using AVG send out requests to whitelist AVG? They have mentioned a process here[^].
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Yup. If all three of them do it, AVG's bound to listen.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but the internet is quarantined because it is unsafe
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
AVG wrote: Hello Chris,
Thank you for contacting AVG.
The detection of your URL by AVG is incorrect. The detection will be removed from an upcoming AVG update. Please make sure that your AVG is updated with the latest virus database:
1. Open AVG.
2. Click the button Update now, or Protection is up-to-date to check for updates.
3. Once a new virus update is downloaded, AVG will not detect the file any more.
Best regards,
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I just updated - still blocked.
I'm guessing they haven't actually pushed the update yet
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Speed is not their forte.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Chris,
Thank you for contacting AVG.
Screw you.
Best regards,
|
|
|
|
|
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
