|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: We probably have a generation of users and developers now for whom it would have no meaning.
Wait. Did you just call me old? 
|
|
|
|
|
I was using the Royal "we". 
|
|
|
|
|
Personalize->Lock Screen->Screen Saver Settings 
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
More things to click on. You gotta love it.
I capture the static generated from my clicks and store them in a battery which I use power my computer.
Great source of renewable energy.
|
|
|
|
|
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Colleagues, 
I've got a question for you: Is it really allowed to develop and use various online applications run on the client PC that perform real-time scheduled downloads of the content from http://www.codeproject.com/ web site with an http-client. For example, an application that uses timer to launch the process of the CodeProject's main page contents downloading every 60 seconds. This is basically similar to using a so-called CodeProject's API tools to build an application that perform the data analysis obtained from the CP's web-site.
Particularly, I'd like to find out if the following will actually mean that by using such application I'm purposely flooding the CP's web site, creating burden traffic to the CP's web servers ??? 
Anyway, if using such real-time web-client applications is unwanted or not permitted, just let me know and I will simply not create and use it.
You know, at this time, I'm working on the windows 7 gadget will perform the notification of the featured and latest articles announced on the CP's main page. Actually, the following gadget will performs xml-http Ajax requests timely within each 60 seconds to download the CP's main page and retrieve the data on the CP's featured articles currently shown to its readers.
Also, soon, I'm going to write an article in which I will discuss about the gadget's implementation and upload the specific code to the article's web page.
|
|
|
|
|
You should be asking the system admins for permission to do this.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply. If the specific admins permission is required, I'd better not to develop and use such web applications. I'm sorry for giving this question.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not saying that you are not allowed to do it. Just that you should ask the right people: the site administrators, not the visitors.
|
|
|
|
|
All right, I will contact and ask them just for my inquiry and interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raddevus, thanks a lot for your comment and guidance.
|
|
|
|
|
Hopefully that is correct since I am answering in an unofficial capacity.
Please refer to all admin comments in relation to exactly what you should do.
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
No thanks. Because as just I've already explained, I'm not going to request any permissions from the admins. Instead, I will simply not to implement and use such unwanted harmful application.
Also, by navigating CP's web site I found the number of articles containing code implementing similar applications including offline articles editors, statistics and the CodeProject API. But, the most of them are not currently active due to security policy restrictions applied. Since then, I will not be implementing such things I've described the post with my question.
|
|
|
|
|
And yes, you're right for sure. We'd better avoid inventing such things I've had plans to implement and announce.
|
|
|
|
|
You can post in the CP API forum, CodeProject API Discussion Boards[^].
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I will probably move the post with my question to the specific forum you've recalled.
Thanks for your post.
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur V. Ratz wrote: You know, at this time, I'm working on the windows 7 gadget will perform the notification of the featured and latest articles announced on the CP's main page. Actually, the following gadget will performs xml-http Ajax requests timely within each 60 seconds to download the CP's main page and retrieve the data on the CP's featured articles currently shown to its readers.
Wouldn't it be easier to just use the RSS feed?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Hurry up with your Windows 7 gadget before this old version gets retired some days. 
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I will make it as fast as I can. When I was writing my question posted, I didn't expect that there would be so much interest to the question I've given in my post. 
P.S. I appreciate to everyone responding my question. Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
It is lack of imagination or any technical difficulty?
Ability to plug an adapter pin either ways is simply a natural comfort.
Particularly when you are trying to do it in low light/dark.
For that matter , even the tradition USB Port comes with this "side" requirement. I always put the wrong side first and turn it to right side. Just wondering couldn't the hardware engineers design a port that could be plugged without worrying about the sides?
Now USB Type-C does it, that does it. But why so late? & Why still USB-A hasn't evolved?
Sounds like an alien plan to frustrate the humans on daily basis. hehe
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
modified 24-Jul-17 7:33am.
|
|
|
|
|
Needs more pins is why.
USB is a four pin system: ground, +5V, Data+, and Data-
If you got it the wrong way round, it could cause damage.
If you look at the pinout for USBC: USB type C Mod time![^] it's a lot more connections, and they are repeated so it doesn't matter which way up the connector is. That's a lot more expensive in terms of connector manufacturing (for both male and female halves) so the natural inclination is to go for a cheaper connector and call it "backwards compatability".
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Since when does reversing VCC and GND have any effect? A cheap and simple 7805 voltage regulator can take that. It may get close to the melting point, but it usually survives and still works afterwards.
|
|
|
|
|
No need for a 7805, a diode will do that job. The point is the connection has to work whichever way its plugged in, otherwise a reversible connector is pointless.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I know. I was referring to an incident where I was building a new power supply for an older computer and accidentally reversed +5V and GND on the main power supply on the computer. The 7805 did a great job in protecting the computer from damage. It got so hot that the solder started to melt, but it still works.
Reversible connectors are a waste if there are too many pins involved. For USB this may be prctical, but on larger connectors I always found it better to ground unneeded pins and also placed them in such a way that they were inbetween two signals that are likely to interfere with each other.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
