|
... He seems to have started a side business in the entertainment industry[^]
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm!
|
|
|
|
|
Must be a great hit, as six and a half hours later 'this product is no longer 'available' 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I never got to solve one and our pkfox friend seems away, so here my attempt at a very easy one:
Gain latine third and greek mount without us plus images make great games (6,8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's great about them?
Nobody has been shot, there are no explosions, not even an alien invasion!
And the closest thing to a zombie is the drugged-out mental state of the Russian curlers... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: What's great about them?
Japanese girls, mostly.
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh great! What did I get? Is it coming in the post?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
...Do you think the guy that coined the term "one hit wonder" ever came up with any other popular phrases? Or? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
It does make a person wonder, doesn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, at least once... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: one hit Wonder
One is really an hairy doughnut, hitting blind people. He should try with someone that can fight back.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: hitting blind people. He should try with someone that can fight back.
Ever watched "Daredevil"? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Fake News, Stevie Wonder had more than 1 hit.
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
So I've got this really very simple PowerShell script:
Copy-Item -Path "C:\TEMP\a" -Destination "C:\TEMP\b" -Recurse -Force
The result... C:\TEMP\b is created and all items from a are copied to b, so far so good.
I run it again, exactly the same as before, except folder b does now exist.
The result... I get a new folder C:\TEMP\b\a with all contents of a.
In what universe is this expected logical behavior!? 
|
|
|
|
|
Makes sense to me: the first one is making a copy of a folder in C:\TEMP, and calling the copy "b".
The second time, B exists, so it assumes you want to copy the folder a into it rather than mix the two up.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'd rather expect a copy operation to be idempotent, it's something that can easily be run more than once unintentionally.
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
I know what you mean, but it is two different operations. The first provides a new name for the copy, the second doesn't.
If you want the same behaviour, then delete the "target folder" as part of your script immediately before the copy operation.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I see where you're coming from but a shell command has two purposes in life - stand-alone and scripting. It shouldn't be optimised for one use over the other.
|
|
|
|
|
If you put it like that it could make sense...
But I'd expect it to run multiple times and produce the same result.
The "fix" is amazing though.
if (Test-Path -Path "C:\TEMP\a") {
if (Test-Path -Path "C:\TEMP\b") {
Copy-Item -Path "C:\TEMP\a\*" -Destination "C:\TEMP\b" -Recurse -Force
} else {
Copy-Item -Path "C:\TEMP\a" -Destination "C:\TEMP\b" -Recurse -Force
}
}Notice the \*, which produces the correct result, but only when the folder exists (if it doesn't you'll get an error because it can't copy nested folders) 
At least the two unexpected behaviors complement each other
|
|
|
|
|
Or just delete the target folder (if it exists) before you do the copy.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Not an option.
Files get added to that folder manually.
It's copy and replace, but never delete
|
|
|
|
|
Create b
Copy a/* to b?
Should work every time because recreating an existing folder won't actually do anything.
I'm pretty sure I would not like to live in a world in which I would never be offended.
I am absolutely certain I don't want to live in a world in which you would never be offended.
Freedom doesn't mean the absence of things you don't like.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Try adding the -Container parameter.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
