|
|
New York Times 05.12.18: "Magnet Implants? Welcome to the World of Medical Punk"
NSFMSA: not safe for mature sane adults.
Note: something weird's going on with the CP site: this pasted-in link is not appearing in the usual format:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/12/us/grindfest-magnet-implants-biohacking.html
Perhaps I'm more open to the ideas here (but, not the practices !) because my ability to walk depends on a hip-replacement, and on a whole bunch of metal plates and screws in my leg (consequence of a hit-and-run motorcyclist who ran me down while I was on a bicycle) ?
«... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12
|
|
|
|
|
that story was a tough read, seemed more like really bad sci-fi.
How do these people get through airport security?
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Same way I do: with lots of alarm noises and a whole load of wand waving and / or rub downs. 
You get used to it, and just explain where all the metalwork is located so they can check. Oh, and stay as far away from MRI scanners as possible...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: get through airport security?
I just point to my leg, and say (to Thai security): "somlit yurt kan nai ka" ("lot of metal in my leg") 
«... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: Welcome to the World of Medical Punk
In many ways, this is a glimpse at the future. 
|
|
|
|
|
Is it really because we have ten fingers? Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?
Btw: I'm Aware, it took a longer time to recognize that "Zero" also exists. From what I remember it was somebody from India who recognized this fact first.
[Edit]
Try to imagine we would have only one finger...
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a sexist remark!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The danes and the french does.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: The danes and the french does.
En est tu certain ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
70 = soixante-dix
80 = quatre-vingts
90 = quatre-vingt-dix
And danish:
50 = halvtreds
60 = tres
70 = halvfjerds
80 = firs
90 = halvfems
In Paris you have (Or had) l’Hôpital des Quinze-Vingts, which used to have 300 beds.
Mostly remnants today, the Swizz (and if I recall correctly the Belgians) have gone full decimal. Switzerland uses septante for 70, octante or huitante for 80 and nonante for 90
In english there are small rests of it too:
"Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal."
(The Gettysberg Address, 1863)
|
|
|
|
|
It is almost correct.
Belgians still use 80 (quatre-vingts).
But you are perfectly right about 70 and 90.
|
|
|
|
|
We count in base 10, but some names remain from the past. 
The dozen is still in little usage: 2 dozen eggs
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I understand it's a leftover from the Celts.
|
|
|
|
|
The dozen, I suspect, is also based on fingers. It's a system that emanates from East Anglia.
98.4% of statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
I read something on this once. From what I recall, 12 is used for dozen and timekeeping because it was easier to break down into fractions with no remainder. 10 is divisible by 2 and 5 whereas 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Would it then not be more logical to use then a system based on 11?
But then you couldn't teach kids about numbers bigger than ten without being arrested... 
Probably, "because it works" - the Babylonians used sexagesimal, which is somewhat unwieldy; the Egyptians were decimal; some native American tribes used pental; Aristotle favoured ten as we have ten fingers; the Gauls and the Mayans were vigesimal (and this can still be seen in how the French count between 60 and 100)
Probably, we have the Roman empire to blame: they brought their culture - and decimal-based numbering system - to most of Europe, and it stuck.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Aristotle favoured ten as we have ten fingers
So even he forgot about the Zero 
[Edit]
To be honest I don't understand  , sorry 
Quote: But then you couldn't teach kids about numbers bigger than ten without being arrested..
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, he was an alcoholic! Bruce's Song[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Of course now I'm absolutely clear about it 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
i am an amateur student of ancient trade routes:OriginalGriff wrote: we have the Roman empire to blame: they brought their culture - and decimal-based numbering system - to most of Europe, and it stuck.
Roman Numerals are a non-positional notation, and incorporate base #5, as well as base #10. Romans used a duo-decimal system for fractions: [^]
I'd give credit for the adoption of the modern positional base #10 decimal system in Europe to the Arab world via ancient Indian, and other, sources: [^].
«... thank the gods that they have made you superior to those events which they have not placed within your own control, rendered you accountable for that only which is within you own control For what, then, have they made you responsible? For that which is alone in your own power—a right use of things as they appear.» Discourses of Epictetus Book I:12
|
|
|
|
|
Holy ... whatever, can you please explain what you are discussing about in "my" thread
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Roman Numerals are a non-positional notation
Roman numbers don't depend for value on their relative distance from the decimal point like ours does: they had different markers for Ten, Fifty, Hundred, and so on (until they needed really big numbers, when they started using bars over the number which multiplied it by 1000).
Quote: incorporate base #5, as well as base #10
They used a kinda composite system , which used both base five (V, L, D) as well as base ten (X, C, M). Division in roman numbers was ... um ... interesting. whi8ch might have been why they used abaci (though we have no idea if they invented it or teh Chinese, they both used very similar devices).
Quote: Romans used a duo-decimal system for fractions
I didn't know that!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Everything clear now, at least after I a take two or three pints
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
