|
And how do you think I am doing it?
If it worked, I would not rant on it.
EDIT:
Ok, I have to recognize that I didn't do it the first time, but I did afterwards (before posting). And yes, I should have told it explicitelly, since it isn't something obvious.
By the way...
12 different drivers doing exactly the same, don't complain.
this driver being executed by the unpacker has no problem at all with the right levels.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 9-Sep-18 9:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: you can't "because admin privileges are needed" (needles to say that I am admin)
Why does windows have this issue to this day?
Any proper operating system would know you have the privileges already and just get it done.
Just download and install a real OS.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Because Windows will not automatically promote an application above its starting privilege level - and for good reasons. If it did, there would be no point at all in having the layer of security, because any app that wanted it could just have itself promoted.
When / if your "real OS" gets as widespread as Windows, you'll probably learn why it's a Good Idea - at the moment there isn't the mass market, so there are far fewer attacks. If one changes, so will the other ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
:cough: PrimeOS :cough:
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: Why does windows have this issue to this day?
Any proper operating system would know you have the privileges already and just get it done.
"Why doesn't Linux run every command I enter with 'su', since it knows I'm part of the sudoers list, I have the privileges already."
Always running with admin just because you're part of that group as you're suggesting is the equivalent of logging into Linux as root. And that's how pre-Vista versions of Windows used to be. And Microsoft realized they couldn't keep doing things that way.
At least as an admin, you don't have to type in your password every time to grant yourself the admin privilege.
|
|
|
|
|
Remember when computers used to be easy to use?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
I remember my spectrum 128 and my first pentium 75 MHz. It was not easy to use them, but it often was less frustrant than nowadays.
I do recognise that one can do tons of stuff more than before, but IMO things are somehow losing "quality".
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
David Crow wrote: Remember when computers used to be easy to use?
Yeah, but they would've been trivial to pwn (yeah, I used that word). OTOH, they weren't connected to the internet back then. Well, not the majority of them. It's been a battle between convenience and security ever since.
Also...it depends how far back you're thinking when you say "easy to use". Some would argue, were they ever? 
|
|
|
|
|
Here's something I can't find the right keywords for googling:
A PC with a six-core processor would be called Hexacore. With an eight-core processor it would be called Octacore.
What would it be called with 32 cores?
I found what the basic multiples of 10 are: hecto, kilo, mega and so forth but I don't know how to put them together to make 32.
Can anyone help with this?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Duotrigesimacore: Base-32 Conversion Tool[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Brilliant! Thank you.
I might have to come up with a different naming scheme for my PC's however, because that one might be a little long for a network name.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a bit of a mouthful, isn't it? 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
In the soapbox I might have had a witty reply to that one.
|
|
|
|
|
And XXX II Core is going to give entirely the wrong impression!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ha! Good one.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: I might have to come up with a different naming scheme for my PC's however,
32 cores, eh? How about BFG 9000 ?
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
|
God in Heaven! What do you plan to do with that beast?
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, the question is what won't I be able to do with it! I plan to find out....
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Nah, the question is what won't I be able to do with it!
Indeed!
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Well, in order to program a Total Perspective Vortex, you also need a piece of fairy cake.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Nah, the question is what won't I be able to do with it! I plan to find out....
... run multi-threaded software that's not NUMA aware (aka almost everything except enterprise level servers) and that needs significant amounts of memory IO without significant degradations in performance, worst case is slower than on the 16 core equivalent that doesn't have the 2 CPU dies gimped due to not having direct ram access.
Conclusions: Not All Cores Are Made Equal - The AMD Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core and 2950X 16-Core Review
YMMV, but unless you know your main workload will play nice, I'd recommend sticking with the 16 core 2950X, or upgrading all the way to Epyc which doesn't have the NUMA related problems because all cores are directly connected to RAM.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
What can't you do with it? IO for one. Computing is probably another.
You'd probably be better off with eight 4x PCs.
IO didn't scale. Neither did RAM bandwidth. And there's a certain amount of scalability when adding processors. It is possible to even end up with a slower system than if it had fewer CPUs.
You will, however, end up with something to boast about
|
|
|
|
|
Holy crap! 
$1800 and "Cooling device not included". What do you cool it with, a domestic freezer?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
