|
How about the long version, cockerel?
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds much better; the mother of all cockerel ups! 😂
modified 6-Sep-22 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
To answer your question, it's all about keeping the site white-listed in various filters employed by companies.
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-jersey-mom-credited-with-stopping-potential-school-shooting-in-kentucky[^]
Quote: “I’m not a guardian angel. I’m not a hero," she said. "I’m a mom."
Uh, yeah, you are. By definition.
MOM = guardian angel
MOM = hero
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome mom!
an Internet history that included a search for how to carry out a school shooting.
What kind of sick person would post crap like that. 
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Not to take anything away from this story, but as I read and break down the article:
- She received nasty messages from a stranger about her kids
- She called the cops
That's it. That's the end of her involvement. Then,
- Cops check out the guy
- Cops happen to run into him as he was leaving his house to perpetrate a massacre
I mean, that's fantastic and all, but if lucky circumstances like these--and that's what they are--make her a "hero", then what does that make of, I dunno, people who actually, knowingly put their lives in danger for the sake of others?
I mean...yeah, lets thank her profusely, but if you can get a medal for dumb luck, by the same logic, why not award medals to lottery winners? I fail to see the heroic act. That's all I'm trying to say.
Now watch my words get twisted, and my intent misconstrued...
|
|
|
|
|
Twisted words aside, I think you are right. The word "hero" is bandied about a bit too loosely these days in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
But not as badly as 'snowflake.'
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I would reply with what I really think about that but this is not The Soapbox.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I actually agree with the points you made. What I was trying to say is that all good Moms are angels and heros, regardless of that Mom's denial of being one.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Well, there's that aspect. The life-long self-sacrifices mothers make outweigh the "deservedness" of the label this particular article was trying to assign (for the wrong reasons).
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's fair to say this was something that any given person should have done.
Sadly, the law enforcement agency deserves some applause for actually doing its job, which is all too rare lately.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
- Hanlon's Razor
|
|
|
|
|
How true.
An underfunded/understaffed department might have delayed the dispatch. Maybe it actually was delayed, but still got there in time--there's no mention in the article that the response was immediate (that I recall - I'd have to go back to it and pay attention to the wording).
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone know of some sort of Android app review site (beyond the Google Play store itself) where people can freely post their opinions on any app? One that isn't influenced by the software's author(s) or whatever Google gives preference to on any given week.
It really looks like the Play Store's download figures and user ratings are turning into completely irrelevant data points when it comes to trustworthiness. Whether they ever were or not is besides the point. Something could have been downloaded tens of millions of times, and rated 4.5+ out of 5, but a given app's actual real-life behavior can still raise some serious questions. I'm seriously beginning to think the Play Store itself is turning into a cesspool of...well, I'm gonna keep this kid-sister friendly as per lounge rules. If Google's ranking can't be trusted, then whose can?
Specifically:
I've have a QR code scanner app, which shall remain nameless, installed on my tablet for years. I honestly can't recall the last time I've used it however. But, I do let the Play store update installed apps regularly.
According to the Settings/App Data Usage applet, which only goes back to June, this is this one app's usage:
Jun: 0 (no surprise - it hasn't been launched since at least that many months ago)
Jul: 10.44MB
Aug: 721MB
Sep: 506MB
Oct: 558MB (so far)
According to the App Info applet, the app only has permission to access the camera (makes sense, as it's a QR reader). So it shouldn't be able to access my videos, pictures, contacts, or upload any data back home. Even if it was explicitly given permission, the tablet is hardly ever used; it's spending most of its time in sleep mode. Or running, but with the screen powered down.
WTE can such an app be doing, transferring over half a GB a month, when the tablet itself is essentially idling 24/7?
People incessantly complain about whatever "unknown things" Windows is constantly doing behind their backs in the background. This is a drop in the ocean IMO when compared to the Android ecosystem (to borrow one of MS's favorite terms)...
|
|
|
|
|
Could it be a bug with the updates?
Not saying this is the case since QR reader apps are some of the worst when it comes to sleazy permission abuse. However, the Google News app has a rather nasty bug which chews up data, even if it is set to Wifi only. Ref: ZDNet article[^].
|
|
|
|
|
RJOberg wrote: Could it be a bug with the updates?
As I understand it, when it comes to updates, the data usage would be attributed to the Play Store app, not the app itself.
|
|
|
|
|
The bug with the Google News app is because the app itself is pulling down absolute loads of data after a recent update. Curious if the QR reader you use is doing the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Depends how "recent" that is. Based on the numbers I posted in my original message, this goes back a few months.
|
|
|
|
|
Original reports were from June of 2018, but it appears to still be an ongoing issue. The only way to 100% prevent it was to disable background data use for the news app.
Doesn't happen to everyone, for instance I haven't noticed it on my phone and I have data limits set up to warn me about high usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great. The app I have is on the list (near the top), and there's some claims it asks for a lot more permissions than an app like needs. OTOH, as I mentioned, Google's own Permissions app under Settings/Apps claims it only needs to access the camera.
Somebody's lying. Given the data usage, I have to think Google's app might not be as accurate as it could be.
The only reason an app like this can remain near the top of the list must be that people don't care that an idling app is still chewing through half a GB worth of data over a month.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: ...and there's some claims it asks for a lot more permissions than an app like needs.
While technically possible, I would lean toward doubtful at this point, at least until more empirical data was provided.
Does the app have ads? If so, whatever permissions those ads require will look no different than the ones actually used by the app.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
The app apparently does have ads, but if it hasn't been launched in months...does it actually sit around and download ads in the background, that you're never going to see?
Over half a gig in a month would be a lot of ads that all manage to circumvent the DNS-level ad-blocker I'm using (Pi-hole).
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: ...but if it hasn't been launched in months...does it actually sit around and download ads in the background...
If the app or the ads have launched any services that start at boot-up, they could be doing most anything (with respect to the permissions granted). Hundreds of MBs seems a bit much, though.
Check the list of running services to find out. If any are present for that app, stop them and let the app go unused for several weeks to see if the usage goes down.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Where's this list of services? I can see the app list, but nothing in there that really distinguishes apps from services (if that's where they're listed).
This is on Android 6, if it matters.
[Edit]
Found it, under Developer options, Running Services. It contains:
- Settings
- Equalizer+ (a music player)
- AcerCare Core
- Google Play services
- InMobi Services (?)
- MTKLogger (?)
- Gboard
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
