|
Yeah that makes sense! Just ebyed the DP1892 and lo they're still available and cheap as hell! $2
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
For my reimagined Elf I would use a CDP1802BCE (usually from Harris or Intersil), that runs at blistering 5 MHz at 5V. A CDP1802ACE would be sufficient for a more or less accurate original Elf, because the CDP1861 graphics chip relies on very accurate timing with the processor. That limits the processor's clock to 1.79 MHz, but any graphics at all in a single board computer were more valuable than brute processor power at the time. Anyway, I would at least replace the original 2101 static memories (256 bytes) at least by something like a 62256 static RAM (32k x 8). I'm sure with his way of making most of very little, the original designer would have done the same if such a thing would have been at his disposal. And a 62256 is easy to get and costs around 2 bucks. We would have killed to get one in 1978.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm looking at maybe doing something with this Arduino Due[^]
It's a PDF - devicedoc/atmel-11057-32-bit-cortex-m3-microcontroller-sam3x-sam3a_datasheet.pdf
Not sure yet if can run programs from SRAM or not though?
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it can do that. At first glance I do not see any of the I/O lines to drive a memory bus. It does have many UARTs and USARTs, so it can access one of those tiny serial ROMs[^], if that helps.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
According to a post in AVRFreaks;
Create a function that is prefixed with this line:
Code: [Select]
__attribute__ ((long_call, section (".ramfunc")))
That will cause the function to reside in RAM. The SAM3X can call RAM functions just the same as FLASH functions so you don't need to do anything else to make the call. It can literally long jump into a RAM function. But, you have to be careful what you do within a RAM function. You generally don't want to be calling external code - just do what you need to do to the hardware and get out.
So yeah you're right I don't see it being practical. Hmm was hoping!
Oh well worth a shot!
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh, ok you don#t want to use external RAM! You just want to run code in the internal RAM. That's something different, of course.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
No I've got no problem with running in external RAM.
If I do this it will probably be with a full fledged processor like the CDP1802, Z80 or something similar?
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I would say that would be the better choice. A 'real' microprocessor is equipped to drive a bus and it's up to you what you want to hook up to that bus and how much of it. More parts, bigger boards and more soldering, but also more freedom to do whatever you are up to. You will have to stay with stone age tech anyway because getting yourself the equipment to develop any hardware more advanced than, let's say a MC68000, can quickly become very expensive. Even worse, you will have a hard time finding suitable periphery chips, because computers depended more and more on custom chipsets and not general purpose devices. Where would be the point to rebuild an Amiga or Atari ST? Simply get one on Ebay if you really want one, but even they are slowly becoming more rare.
But microcontrollers are also very useful. Even cheap little PIC microcontrollers can easily emulate periphery chips that are long out of production. In my new Elf I want to use them as PS/2 ports, bootloader, hex keyboard encoder, hex display driver and interrupt encoder, just to name a few. Most of these tasks could only inadequately be done with simple logic gates because they would take up far more space on your board and quickly cost more than that simple microcontroller.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: machines with front panels with lights and switches
When I was in college I took a class in real-time programming. The lab environment was two DEC PDP-11/05's. Both of them had a 128-word core memory board that stored the boot code for RT-11 (the PDP-11 operating system). Unfortunately the core memory was not protected from writing, so student programs could (and did regularly) overwrite the boot code. Fortunately a dump of the 80 or so words of boot code was laminated to the front of the machine cabinet. Almost everyone taking the class had to re-enter the boot code with the front panel switches at least once. One bad programmer poor soul got so good at it he could re-enter the boot code in under 60 seconds.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Would that poor soul have been you? 
I got an Altair 8800 from the college and played with it for a while, but then I got an Commodore 64 and that consumed all my time after that.
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: Would that poor soul have been you?
Nope. I only had to re-enter the boot a couple of times.
I remember two things about that class.
One, PDP-11 assembly language was elegant. Every addressing mode worked with every register, even when that didn't make any sense. I remember a single instruction that you could write that would cause the CPU to copy the instruction to the word at the preceding address in memory and then jump there. The end result was the address register (as displayed on the front panel lights) would continuously decrement. The machine was useless, but the result was fun.
Two, we built a small real-time multithreading kernel in the course. For all that the basics only required < 100 lines of code, it was pretty cool. It only supported two constructs - semaphores and context switching. We could still build pretty cool applications with it. The final project for the course was to read punch cards from a card reader, print their content on a line printer, and at the same time talk to a serial CRT terminal for displaying status. Getting the whole thing working was the first step. To pass the course you had to let the instructor halt the machine, dump the memory, and you had to walk the dump and tell him where every thread was executing and what it was doing. One of the most difficult classes I ever had, but also the most fun.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I wrote some assembly for a PDP/11 and yes it was fairly elegant, I enjoyed it.
The class sounds pretty cool but difficult.
Still write assembler on an ATMega328P, although rarely, most the time I use C or C++!
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't written assembly language in quite a while. The last was some Microchip PIC code on a *cough* outside job *cough* a few years ago. I've had to learn to read 'ColdFire' assembly language (distant successor to the 68000) recently, but haven't needed to write it yet.
Most of my development is in C#, C++, and C.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Thee's really not much of a need anymore, unless you've got some tight timing that needs to be done. Most everything can be done with C or variants.
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. You see it in embedded stuff (that's where all of mine is found) and maybe low-level kernel programming. I can't imagine using it directly in an application. Even performance-enhancers (graphics GPU's and other outboard stuff) give you at least a 'C'-level interface nowadays.
Think we've frightened the youngsters sufficiently? 
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Wheeler wrote: Think we've frightened the youngsters sufficiently?
I think we lost em at C and C++!
Got my site back up after my time in the woods!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Gary Wheeler wrote: One, PDP-11 assembly language was elegant.
Even more elegant is a processor that has only one addressing mode, loading and storing everything via its many general purpose registers. Essentially that's a RISC processor.
Mike, that CDP1802 I was talking about was one of the earliest RISC designs, before the term RISC was even invented. And I think it bears a remote resemblance to the later ARM processors.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
CodeWraith wrote: I just found this in a digital copy of BYTE magazine from 8/1976
But the guys who were complaining in those days were really happy, about 15 years later, when VB was released.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It'll never end. A programming language is like a relationship. We complain about our partner being inadequate and difficult, fall in love with a different person and break up with the first person, we become emotionally attached to its beauty, fall out of love as we discover the warts. Eventually, if we mature enough, we accept and learn to work with our partner. Programming languages are the same except that polygamy is not just acceptable but desired and there are upgrades occasional upgrades, which we also cry and whine and argue about. And recruiters are really nothing more than a dating service, and equally pathetic at match making.
Latest Article - Slack-Chatting with you rPi
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Recruiters are like a dating service? Some more resemble pimps.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
CodeWraith wrote: Some more resemble pimps.
touché
Latest Article - Slack-Chatting with you rPi
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
If one of them ever tries bitch slapping me because he thinks I did not bring him enough money, he will learn to read my previous experience more closely. One of my previous employers had seen to it that I get some lessons in close combat and also had me spend at least one day at a shooting range each month.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: It'll never end.
Language creators make sure of that by "improving" languages until they're no longer usable, then they start all over again after a few years.
Did I hear about pointers being a feature in the next C#, or was someone pulling my leg?
|
|
|
|
|
My experience with managing Linux servers is limited, but now it comes creeping in ...
I was setting up a catalog of all our PCs. In Windows, I can read all of CPU model / frequency, amount of RAM, disk types and capacities, network interfaces etc. etc. in more or less one place - most of it is in Control Panel Device Manager or System. (Or, I can use any of a large selection of 3rd party programs, presenting even more info and even more collected in a single place.)
Which Linux utilities can provide collected information, preferably in a single program, providing a single report on the hardware it is running on? (I have come across single pieces of information here and there, but would definitely prefer to find it all in one place, one utility!)
|
|
|
|
|
lshw is out-of-the-box. May need to be run as root; check on your box(es).
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
