|
It has nothing to do with your eyes (not certainly anyway)...
Ever saw fish just under the shining surface of the lake? Try to take a picture of it and find the fish there...
Eye and camera 'see' differently (That's why a self driving car can be fooled about red-green lights with simple sticks that human eye-brain easily ignore)...
Plus the photo is a very low quality...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Yea, thanks! 
|
|
|
|
|
Took me 30 seconds... but just because i was looking for a tank... dmn germans 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature))
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + _signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see, perhaps, a feline. How could one possibly tell it is a Leopard?
|
|
|
|
|
Look at those dots!
What else could it be.. too broad for a cheetah....
|
|
|
|
|
It's like one of those magic eye pictures, as soon as you stop looking hard it comes into focus.
|
|
|
|
|
I regret opening this thread. Now I'm wasting time.
Could someone help me with the quadrant [^] at least?
|
|
|
|
|
Edited:
Look into your email notifications to see the answer. I don't want to leave the spoiler open
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
lol thanks, I just saw it by myself.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, finally! 
|
|
|
|
|
Still looking for leopard in that?
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature))
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + _signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I got it! But it did pain my eye, looking for one.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, looked for several minutes and gave up.
Yeah my eyes are really bad!
I do all my own stunts, but never intentionally!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Edited:
Look into your email notifications to see the answer. I don't want to leave the spoiler open
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, still don't see it.
I do all my own stunts, but never intentionally!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
~20 seconds, but I felt like I will never see it. I bet people can find it faster if you say:
"the face of a leopard"
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Yes that was the trick.
The landscape looked like it's huge rocks & big trees, So you naturally look for a lizard size creature on the frame. But it's deceptive.
|
|
|
|
|
Here it is[^]
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I was going to place a similar pic...
I was thinking the same thing to start with...
|
|
|
|
|
That would be a good test for a leopard recognition AI. 
Latest Article - Azure Function - Compute Pi Stress Test
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
wear the costume you already bought with even more pride: [^] ?
I want to be tested to be sure I am not related to a Kardashian, so I can go on living.
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: I want to be tested to be sure I am not related to a Kardashian, so I can go on living.
Why? What sort of costume have you bought?
OTOH, you probably are. Go back about 40 generations (about 1,000 years) and you should have ~1 Trillion ancestors. At that time the human population is estimated to be about 275 Million. That's a lot of overlap.
|
|
|
|
|
k5054 wrote: Go back about 40 generations (about 1,000 years) and you should have ~1 Trillion ancestors
Your demographics need revising: you are ignoring repetition: [^].
If you go back far enough, "nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago" [^].
I am very comfortable with having a small rodent as an ancestor, but, I draw the line at Kardashian.
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
