|
i feel like my code would have, if it had an HR department. Glad I didn't implement that.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I was the smartest kid in my social group, but I was/am a loner.Figure that.
It always amazed me that ((/3)*3) != 1 on a finite precision machine and we could still actually do useful calculations.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
codewitch honey crisis wrote: When you have a string interning problem.
FML.
Sounds like an interesting challenging life though! 
|
|
|
|
|
lol. yeah i guess. if debugging is interesting and challenging. I fixed it though so yay.
I had an == in a couple of places where I meant Equals - yes it was that simple, as the trickiest bugs often are.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
modified 7-May-19 8:37am.
|
|
|
|
|
Or in java, if you have the same class loaded by 2 different class loaders!
You also end up with multiple instances of statics, etc.
which means
One singleton per class loader...
|
|
|
|
|
That's weird. I always side eye java for some of its dark corners - they type system is dodgy, IMO.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
I should add- I blame myself for the problem. I can clearly explain and understand why this problem occurred. It even makes sense, once you understand the twists and turns involved. It's not due to a hack, or a weird type system. It's due to the fact that object - the root type in the heirarchy - has no == overload associated - because it wouldn't make sense with it so == will only do reference comparisons, just like C++ on an object.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Friction operating fictional beast (6)
|
|
|
|
|
Friction DRAG
operating ON
fictional beast
DRAGON
Got the answer immediately - took me a while to work out why ... 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ya 
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: GɸT the answer immediately
FTFY!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
I've never watched an episode - but I suspected it might have been involved, since it was broadcast yesterday. 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Deveaux wrote: CCC V VI MMXIX
Did I start something?
Socialism is the Axe Body Spray of political ideologies: It never does what it claims to do, but people too young to know better keep buying it anyway. (Glenn Reynolds)
|
|
|
|
|
No, I think it was the Romans.
What did they ever do for us?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
They left a bunch of ruins all over Europe - you think they could have cleaned up after themselves.
Socialism is the Axe Body Spray of political ideologies: It never does what it claims to do, but people too young to know better keep buying it anyway. (Glenn Reynolds)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just made a post in the reddit rust section, with my honest critique of the language from the perspective of an experienced C++ developer who has been exploring it. There were a good many responses and a good discussion going on. But presumably it wasn't sufficiently positive, and it just got whacked.
I never cease to be amazed at how language fans circle the wagons against any criticism. For a minute there I thought the Rust section might be actually more mature than the C++ one, where punitive down-voting is rampant. But I guess not.
That doesn't fill me with an urge to commit to the language.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
Me: Product X shouldn't _____ .
Fan: But it does.
Me: Yes, but it shouldn't.
Fan: Of course it should; that's how it was designed.
Me: But it shouldn't have been.
Fan: It's the paradigm the designer chose.
Me: It was a poor choice.
Etc. etc. etc.
It's been going on for decades and it won't change.
|
|
|
|
|
In this case, Rust is still fairly young and has room for for growth. I was just throwing in my two cents on what I felt was holding me back from committing to it. If people don't speak up, no one's going to guess what we want.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
Dean Roddey wrote: If people don't speak up
Sure, but if the designer/implementer doesn't ask for input (when it will actually help) it's hardly any use (after the fact).
As with complaining about some of the features of C.
When Walter Bright was designing D (twenty years ago now?), he did ask for input on certain features, and took the feedback of testers into consideration.
Yet which language is getting more traction?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that's more to do with the relative heft of the entities behind the two languages, not whether they took feedback or not.
And obviously they aren't going to come to my house and have tea with me and ask my my opinion. That's one of the reasonably positive reasons the internet exists. We can make our opinions known publicly. At least when they aren't censored.
And I would think that they do actually pay attention to what people think to some extent. They presumably want people to adopt it widely enough to make it more than a niche language, which currently it very much is. And there's nothing wrong with public debate amongst users and potential users, IMO.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Sure, but if the designer/implementer doesn't ask for input (when it will actually help) it's hardly any use (after the fact).
And even when they ask, there is no certainty that they will use / make something out the given feedback
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Dean Roddey wrote: But presumably it wasn't sufficiently positive, and it just got whacked.
Did they actually delete it or just down-vote it? I'd like to read it if you leave us a link to it.
It sounds as if you were giving a balanced evaluation.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
