|
You call yourself a developer, and you deliberately throw away information! 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
It's mostly drivel anyway 
|
|
|
|
|
Could have been any of the Daft Punk anime vids, but I believe you'd remember them due to popularity. Popularity probably also rules out A-Ha's Take On Me. From stuff I've tagged, maybe Helsing Ultimate, but I don't remember posting it. Maybe Monolith or Equinoxious? Those two are on the Are Sounds Electric video list, which has a bunch of eclectic stuff in it, for hours of going down rabbit holes if you wish. There was some vid about a boy and/or girl, going into/up a pyramid and becoming perfected or something like that, which I've forgotten and don't have a link to. A couple others dimly ring in my consciousness, but can't recall them well enough to even search. If all else fails, maybe something from this list will get your mind off of it. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
Here's an eclectic non-anime from Are Sounds Electric: Touch Me 400TM - YouTube. Ture Love!
('Ture' is my eclectic word for 'true' today.)
|
|
|
|
|
Of course I know Daft Punk, A-HA and the Prodigy, those weren't what I was looking for.
I didn't know Monolith and Equinoxious. They aren't what I was looking for either, but they sound good!
What's that blue fins-as-ears alien on the Are Sounds Electric page?
It looks strangely familiar... Although I don't think that's what I'm looking for either 
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe this. YouTube gives a 'Mix - Lorn - Anvil' to the right of that vid, that might also start you towards finding the one you are looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And now for a change of pace. Maybe that will help me get back to work! Sure wish I could find that weird pyramid vid, now that it's on my mind. Really trippy.
|
|
|
|
|
This one's particularly nice, but as you can guess, not what I was looking for either 
|
|
|
|
|
... what does he do with Robin once he's grown out of the uniform? 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
He should be careful. Just last weekend I saw Robin fire the Batzooka[^] at a gold plated tank, which the Penguin was trying to steal.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
modified 31-Jul-19 8:48am.
|
|
|
|
|
no problem, old people shrink so they swap.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Lee Williams, Software Engineer at Cloudera, describing AI ML programming with PyMC3, said: [^] :Quote: You don’t find yourself writing a lot of for loops, or the order in which things need to happen: you simply describe the world and press go, and the probabilistic programming language figures out the implications of that.
William has a Ph.D. in Astrophysics, and there's content on statistics (history, Bayes, Monte Carlo etc.) in the podcast I really enjoyed.Quote: Salvador Dali said: "Intelligence without ambition is a bird without wings."
My question is: can a PyMC3 bird you just pressed "go" on fly ?
I marvel at the "brave new world" of these exotic new programming tools, methods, algorithms, languages ... I imagine them as "Eaters of Streams" (EOS), which, for me, resonates with the image of the "dawn horse," Eohippus. But, maybe that's unfair, because that dog-sized forest herbivore went extinct after less than beaucoup de millenia, before they even had a chance to put their hoof down (they had toesies).
But, I am not troubled by the likelihood I will exit this adventure in consciousness in the biological fun-house of a hominid body without seeing the future "stallions" evolved from these prototypes that I suspect will create as much of a "black swan" discontinuity for homo saps as did the domestication of the horse in the great steppes of central Asia.
I will now descend to lower altitudes 
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
modified 31-Jul-19 6:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
intelligence itself... I would say no, this is a quality.
But to improve and be "more clever", I say yes. To start learning the unknown (for you at least) requires a certain ambition.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Intelligence no, knowledge yes.
|
|
|
|
|
I fully agree with this. However, I also like to argue, so...
Could you not argue that although your maximum capacity for intelligence may be fixed, you would only be able to achieve you full potential if you keep your brain active and in shape? (This would be were the ambition/motivation comes in to play).
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: Could you not argue
You can.
By intelligence, I assume the OP wanted to talk about fluid intelligence (the ability to think new without relying on previous experiences).
When it comes to crystallized intelligence one must apply previous experiences (knowledge) to newer situations, in that case, you'd be correct to point out that ambition is necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
GKP1992 wrote: fluid intelligence (the ability to think new without relying on previous experiences)
Neurologically, this is nonsense; however you may be pointing to the variation of awareness of context during intelligence manifested/enacted/experienced.
It is very interesting that some recent studies indicate more intelligent people may have fewer connections between neurons: [^]
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
I'll have to take a closer look at the study, but from the article, it seems they've ignored a lot of variables.
|
|
|
|
|
What is happening in neuroscience right now is amazing, and a lot of old assumptions are getting thrown out (as well as studies considered "classics" that cannot be replicated).
It's up for grabs whether "intelligence" is a useful construct, given how many ways it is defined, measured, compared, and given the 'baggage" of cultural chauvinism the concept carries.
Find me a study of intelligence that hasn't ignored a lot of variables 
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: Find me a study of intelligence that hasn't ignored a lot of variables
That's precisely why I do not invest much time in discussions related to intelligence metrics. For me a person who is really good with art and not reasoning is as intelligent as a person that is good with reasoning.
Its again the correlation-causation debate.
|
|
|
|
|
Well ya see, Norm, it’s like this… A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo. And when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members.In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Excessive intake of alcohol, as we know, kills brain cells. But naturally it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. That’s why you always feel smarter after a few beers."
-Cliff Clavin
But I never wave bye bye
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: evolved
There you have the keyword. Evolution, up to now the only algorithm that has produced anything like intelligence, is aimless. It's goal is survival by being fitter than any competition. Intelligence is just a byproduct, just another way to be 'fitter'. Claws and teeth may work just as well.
You can try to usher the algorithm towards producing a higher intelligence, but that would result in an AI that is only fit for the protected environment in which it was evolved. This way we might get great computer controlled characters in a game, but how far would an artificially intelligent Skyrim player get in the real world?
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
You are right (as is Dawkins) in pointing to the absence of a "teleological engine" in evolution. S. J. Gould emphasized that existing functional traits can be abandoned, as well as new mutations thriving, in the right circumstances.
Given the simple life-forms homo saps evolved from, I see no reason to conclude that these early in the game software tools may never evolve into "whatevers" that are now the plots of innumerable sci-fi, and horror, movies. I believe machine/computational consciousness is possible, and probable, although I believe I will not see it in my lifetime.
It took six-million years and 250k generations for Saps to to get from gorilla to hominid: along the way we somehow chose the species suicidal strategy of big heads that had trouble getting through the birth canal, a female menstrual cycle (of around 5000 mammal species: unique to Homo Saps) involving enough loss of blood to threaten anemia during famine, short guts, and giving birth to "living fetuses" that require long periods of total care while their big brains got juiced-up:Quote: In comparison to other apes, we are born prematurely, and this can be measured very clearly in neural growth, which, while it slows sharply after birth in chimpanzees, continues at a rate of a quarter of a million neurons per minute in human babies until the age of one.
Timothy Taylor, "The Artificial Ape." [^]
Homo Saps, through technology, has insulated itself from the qualitative selection pressures other life-forms face. We are outside the classic Darwinian paradigm.
I think an interesting hypothesis is that at some point Homo Saps becomes the biological agents of artificial intelligences: we carry out the genetic engineering to create the symbiotic embodiments (hardware, wetware, software) instrumental to the further evolution of the AI's. Animal-human hybrids: coming up, now: "Human-animal hybrids are to be developed in embryo form in Japan after the government approved controversial stem-cell research." [^].
Perhaps an analogy is the way the life cycle of the parasite toxoplasma gondii [^] has "engineered" mice to be less afraid of cats as a method of replicating in its desired site, the cat brain.
Cat => Mouse => Cat : AI => Saps => AI
Landing gear lowered.
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
modified 31-Jul-19 14:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: Homo Saps, through technology, has insulated itself from the qualitative selection pressures other life-forms face. We are outside the classic Darwinian paradigm.
No. That's the biggest mistake of all. Most people still are as much subject to the forces of nature, to hunger and disease as we always were. Perhaps the top 15 percent really have access to medicine, adequate nutrition and live a sheltered life. Besides that, we may play on a different stage, but the rules have not changed. If anything, the competition may even be fiercer.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
