|
|
So he is up to his old tricks again: Edwards[^] 
|
|
|
|
|
We use deltek, which sucks hairy donkey testicles.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
deltek sounds like a class of railway locomotive we used to have in the uk Deltec or Diesel Electric.
|
|
|
|
|
Witty Title - Album on Imgur[^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why would you post that? I'm cringing at the thought 
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Found this:
CSS Reference[^]
and this:
HTML attribute reference - HTML: Hypertext Markup Language | MDN[^]
But what I'd really like is reference where each element has a description of permitted attributes and styles. I mean, really, if I were writing a rendering engine (which I'm not) where is the gospel of what's permissible as an element's styles and how all these styles behave?
Actually, W3Schools has done a great job of making an interactive UI -- click on one of the style definitions, like "display", and you can see all the options and even how they behave. Still, I don't want to be clicking everywhere. Isn't there an actual document somewhere?
In my insufficient google-fu, I stumbled across something interesting but unrelated:
Custom Elements: defining new elements in HTML - HTML5 Rocks[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Start here: HTML 5.2: 3. Semantics, structure, and APIs of HTML documents[^]
The current spec has anchors to elements that an element inherits from so it's easier to search and browse in the page rather than in a search engine. It's not really authoritative though because browser and web developers do whatever they want, and that eventually gets reflected in the spec.
I don't know if there's anything quite as helpful for CSS rules, as far as I understand it there's some basic rules about defaults (block vs inline elements for example), but mostly that's decided by browsers.
CSS is much bigger, but I think you'd start here: CSS Snapshot 2018[^] (Links to all of the pages that I think you actually want)
Just remember:
Yoda: Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hah, I posted that earlier in the Insider News.  (OK, maybe I'm looking for some hugs right now, otherwise there's not much point to saying that, haha.)
|
|
|
|
|
:hugs:
(I had actually posted this in Tuesday’s newsletter, so I guess I need hugs too. No one reads it anymore  )
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: (I had actually posted this in Tuesday’s newsletter, so I guess I need hugs too. No one reads it anymore
Ah! I read it! I did a cursory scan but didn't go back to Tuesday. 
:hug back:
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe he should have used NOTNULL.
Not sure whether seven characters are allowed in a license plate.
|
|
|
|
|
In some states, yes. California and Arizona definitely.
California also allows some symbols.
|
|
|
|
|
Any states give you enough characters to have 'DROP TABLE'?
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
- Hanlon's Razor
|
|
|
|
|
Probably not long enough for this one:
Speed camera SQL Injection : geek[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
GitHub - codewitch-honey-crisis/pck: The Parser Construction Kit ("Puck")[^]
Syntax highlighting for XBNF, PCK, C# and VB files.
Generates code and pcks.
still alpha, but stable enough anyway, for the most part.
it works as is, but is unfinished, yet cool
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
No API documentation (XML comments)? 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
some of it. When the codebase gets more stable i'm going to finish it
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the meantime, here are the articles on the project that i have finished so far with more to come. And updates eventually. The latest code is always at Github
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/5163943/Pck-The-Parser-Construction-Kit
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/5164706/Pck-LALR-1-An-LR-parsing-algorithm
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/5163845/Pck-FA-A-Regular-Expression-and-Finite-State-Engin
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure why, but I got to thinking about all the hunting trips my Dad and I did in Alaska, and got a hankering for lunch. Could not find any left over C-Rations, so made a fried Spam sammich and some canned peaches. a 20" rainbow trout or steelhead would have been nice, but alas, you cannot find those in Florida 
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, navigate a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects! - Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the name says it all: Alas-ka 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
