|
So I just picked up mongoDB documentation. I've never even touched mongo before. I've only heard of it.
Turns out its document format is nearly identical to my "struples" JSON-superset library.
It also turns out that TMDb's API is probably powered by mongo (based on the presence of the _id hash fields)
Which if true means that my more general JSON REST RPC api connects most easily with those since I designed it around a system like that.
I just won.  yay!
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Who the heck puts tutorial code under an Apache License?!
Now I basically can't use it, because anything I learn from it carries this huge bag on the side of paperwork, and restrictions.
Why not MIT, or heck, public domain, since it's tutorial code.
I don't get it. I just don't get it.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
License shmicense!
They probably had to pick something and couldn't care less 
You can learn from anything, even the most restrictive commercial license, or are they going to capture you and burn that knowledge from your brain?
Just don't copy teh codez (and possibly copyrighted ideas and methods).
|
|
|
|
|
my problem with that is my brain copies to memory whether i want to or not, so if i spend some time with a sample that taught me how to do something, my code usually looks a lot like it. This is truer the less I understand about the subject
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
... that Soulja Boy isn't a real soldier; and that Dr Dre isn't actually a doctor.
But did you know Adele isn't even a computer?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Next you'll be telling me 50 Cent doesn't have two pennies to rub together.
|
|
|
|
|
and Ice Cube has zero chill.
and Ice-T isn't actually delicious.
And Vanilla Ice isn't even an ice cream flavor.
And Aesop Rock has nothing to do with philosophy or rock music.
I am disappoint.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
But Dr.Alban really is a dentist !
|
|
|
|
|
And Sheryl Crow can't fly!
Technician
1. A person that fixes stuff you can't.
2. One who does precision guesswork based on unreliable data provided by those of questionable knowledge.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Snoop Doggy Dog wasn't a dog so he changed his name to Snoop Dogg, because he was high, but he still wasn't a dog, so he changed his name to Snoop Lion, but he's also not a lion despite what the drugs make him believe.
I've also seen a Fat Joe video where Fat Joe wasn't the fattest 
|
|
|
|
|
Just a friendly Hi! this Wednesday with hopes all your code compiles without error or even a warning today.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: all your code compiles without error or even a warning today
Yep, thank you!
-- Segmentation Fault
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Yep, thank you!
What a disappointment... 
I was somehow expecting something in the line of:
Errors are good to develope character.
Klingon programmers don't have errors. They don't compile, they write directly in machine code.
 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Klingon developers are utterly unpredictable.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Klingon programmers don't have errors. They don't compile, they write directly in machine code.
They were clearly trained by Chuck Norris!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Anders wrote: all your code compiles without error or even a warning
A sure sign that there's something seriously wrong somewhere. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Different kinda day, but everything worked out well in the end, so I'm happy.
My code never gives me warnings!*
* But only because I have "Treat warnings as errors" set by default... 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I created a "Hello World" C++ console application targeting the Linux platform. It remotely compiled and debugged the code smoothly.
Being an old dog, I am impressed.
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: Being an old dog, I am impressed.
It's supposed to be able to. You're impressed it...does? 
(No need to explain...I know exactly where you're coming from)
|
|
|
|
|
Not to get all meta here, but ... and your point is?
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
The point is, if VS is supposed to be able to do something, and it does, why should anyone be impressed? Are expectations so low?
|
|
|
|
|
My group still uses VS2008 as our primary development tool. I would like to update to VS2017, or possibly VS2019. A change like that would require full regression testing at all levels in a code base somewhere around 3 million lines of C# and C++. That kind of test, even with parts of it performed in parallel to the upgrade process, would add weeks if not months to our schedule.
I'll freely admit that the volume of complaints of crashes and other bad behavior as compared to the lukewarm descriptions of new and enhanced features do not inspire me to push my PHB's to have us upgrade.dandy72 wrote: Are expectations so low?
In two words, ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) yes.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Until you get a confirmed (reported and acknowledged) c++ compiler bug. 
We reverted back to vs2017 until the bug is fixed.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, g++ is reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
Remember the turbo c days?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
