|
|
He should've said nohomo 
|
|
|
|
|
|
This article is in the Product Showcase section for our sponsors at CodeProject. These articles are intended to provide you with information on products and services that we consider useful and of value to developers.
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
abmv wrote: for our sponsors at CodeProject.
Disguised ads, since the normal ads don't provide enough money.
If you haven't updated your hosts-file to at least the mvps-version, you're not just an idiot, but a liability to your company.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely sounds spammy to me.
Report it and move on if you like.
Don't advertise it here.
modified 4-Oct-19 10:50am.
|
|
|
|
|
As abmv says, this is a "trusted author" - it even says as much in the article:
EnableX is a communication platform for embedding video/voice calls and messaging into any apps and sites. Built on a carrier-grade platform, it offers developers with all the necessary toolkits to develop engaging communication experience from one-to-one chats to large-scale broadcast/Webinar.
This article is in the Product Showcase section for our sponsors at CodeProject. These articles are intended to provide you with information on products and services that we consider useful and of value to developers.
There is no need to report sponsors articles.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
These are Product Showcase articles. They are paid placements by sponsors.
"This article is in the Product Showcase section for our sponsors at CodeProject. These articles are intended to provide you with information on products and services that we consider useful and of value to developers."
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
That doesn't mean we have to like them.
And a better (less spammy) title may be in order.
modified 4-Oct-19 11:31am.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: And a better (less spammy) title may be in order
Seriously?
"Creating a Production-Ready WebRTC App for Video Calls: 5 Considerations for Developers"
Where's the spam? If I were a developer working on a video call system (and we've worked on something similar) then an article that lays out questions you need to know the answers to before you start is hugely useful.
I'm pretty harsh on our sponsors about what's OK and what's not but that article I particularly liked. It provides information without asking anything from you. It offers their take on the problem without pushing.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It's not a professional-quality title. I wouldn't take it seriously.
Might be OK for a blog, not for an article.
Just shy of, "this one weird trick..."
Along with all the, "the blah blah blah you will use!", posts.
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen (and reported to you) several articles getting that message or the "editorial note" without being real showcases   
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
So where do you draw the line?
This is a sponsor, which CP obviously needs to keep it free.
But every article uses one product or another.
Is it not advertisement when an article uses C#?
Only because C# is more widely used or because it's free?
C# comes with Visual Studio, which has a paid subscription.
And don't forget the Windows you need to run it.
Ultimately, they're all advertisements, except that we only tolerate those whose products we already use.
Personally, I don't care as long as the article is good.
I'll read it if I think I need the product (or maybe it solves a problem I have, but I just don't know it yet).
This article is pretty informative even when I don't need their product, so I see no problem (even if it wasn't a sponsor).
I don't make the rules though
|
|
|
|
|
Will glass coffins be a success? Remains to be seen.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: I'm reasonably sure I won't leave a good-looking corpse.
why? what would you do with it?
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Creepy 
“The palest ink is better than the best memory.” - Chinese Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: I'm reasonably sure I won't leave a good-looking corpse.
That was never my intent, and I think it was Dennis Leary who said that if (paraphrasing) that's how you're living your life, you're not doing it right...
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it should be a compostable coffin? It seems like Griff is into recycling.
I, for one, like Roman Numerals.
|
|
|
|
|
at least though it'll stop the magicians attending the wake from sawing the coffins in half,
... they never like to reveal how the trick is done.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
Some might have a bone to pick with you over that thought.
“The palest ink is better than the best memory.” - Chinese Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt it. Methinks the public will see through that idea.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
more of a selling point to a mausoleum, because the remains would be seen!
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly successful? I would say that's clearly dead.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
