|
F*** I actually thought it was Wednesday
|
|
|
|
|
Um. It is Wednesday, I just checked. With about four devices - and they all agree: today is Wednesday, 27th November 2019
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
EDIT: I had included an article in case folks haven't heard, but evidently that is considered spam. 
modified 27-Nov-19 3:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
We all read/get the same news.
Please don't repost news here unless you have something to comment yourself,
otherwise it's spam/phising on behalf of the organisations named/reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what the original message was, but reading the subject... I would not think it is spam.
I personally think it was more a rant or a debate start for "freedom of speech" vs. "company benefits"
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I personally think it was more a rant or a debate start for "freedom of speech" vs. "company benefits"
Yeah but how does just reposting the article "start a debate??"
by all means re-post an article, but then don't title it "let's discuss," without starting that discussion. Like I said we all read news, what was gained by reposting it with nothing else said?
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
lopatir wrote: reposting the articl
Reposting from where? I went to Insider News and didn't see it. Perhaps I am blind.
lopatir wrote: what was gained
If we make it a rule to only post things that offer gain then this forum will go very quiet. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
lopatir wrote: Like I said we all read news, what was gained by reposting it with nothing else said?
Like I said
Nelek wrote: I don't know what the original message was,
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
the goat in your machine wrote: We all read/get the same news.
You don't speak for me.
the goat in your machine wrote: otherwise it's spam/phising on behalf of the organisations named/reporting.
Not even close. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
If the article is no blatant publicity and you use it as the source to start a debate, it is not spam.
But I agree in the "try to not repost" (if proceed).
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: If the article is no blatant publicity and you use it as the source to start a debate
Yeah but how does just reposting the article "start a debate"
by all means re-post an article, but then don't title it "let's discuss," without starting that discussion.
Message Signature
(Click to edit ->)
|
|
|
|
|
If it is a repost, would you please link the first post of the topic?
I didn't see the original message... only the edited version after the answer of "the goat in your machine". So I can't say if the article linked had been already used or not.
I can recall something about this topic (can't find it, though) but not in recent times.
And anyways, I continue saying that the subject line is pretty much more an indicative for the start of a debate than many of the threads posted in the lounge.
But I can't tell for sure if it was one or not, because (again) I didn't read the original message.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
swampwiz wrote: but evidently that is considered spam.
No, it's not. Ignore those telling you it is, unless of course the site owners tell you it is.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A structure that holds a lexeme, including the symbol id and associated value
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh good. So what's a "symbol id"?
|
|
|
|
|
an id for a symbol
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
nice clue - how many letters?
ok that was erk.
How bout (4)
CARD
modified 27-Nov-19 1:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
i explain it all here
How to Build a Regex Engine in C#[^]
but basically a symbol is something you attach to an expression. as you move through text, several patterns/expressions are evaluated and the one that matches on each move is reported. The symbol id is what is reported.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
tl;dr - but I still think it's a nifty clue - hmm... now if we could do that for anagrams... hmmm
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, so it's basically a classification of the value -- such as the part-of-speech of a word.
I'm mainly asking due to my recent foray into the parsing (or probably just lexing) of JSON.
As it stands, my "tokens" are just bare strings with no classification -- or all have the implicit classification of "token".
|
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: IT WORKED ON THE FIRST TRY.
Haha, enjoy the feeling of magic 
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
