|
When I was younger money was probably more of a factor. I'm older now *cough cough* and am paid well for the work that I do. So for me the things I've listed are important. I want to be happy where I work. I've had a few roles in the past where I wasn't happy due to things like the culture, people etc. So for me personally, happiness is more important than money.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
What you say now is exactly what I said in the post before this.
But in your OP you only talk about the actual work tasks, and THAT is completely irrelevant - in my humble opinion - unless of course you take a job where you don't actually know what you're doing. In that case it's definitely stressing (not that I would know, of course  ).
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
When you say local, does it mean less commute? And is that same/different for current job?
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Both my current role and this role are local to me. In fact, the new role is based literally across the road. So the commute will be identical.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
If you really want to pursue both, perhaps alter the current contract to make it 3 days a week and do 1 day a week at new one.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Some points to ponder over:
- Is the new job going to be reasonably more challenging and/or rewarding?
Are you going to be learning anything new in your current role? Compare this to what you may learn in the new role. - What are the things that you want in your job? Now, what are the things that you don't have in your current job, that will be offered to you in your new job?
- Now for the corollary - what are the things that you have taken for granted in your current role that you don't know will get in the new role?
- All else being the same, what about the other factors/privileges? Like being able to work flexible time, or working from home, miscellaneous allowances like bonuses and perks, working hours, paid holidays, etc.
- Will the existing role want to match the new benefits in order to retain you? If yes, is this something that you will want to consider?
|
|
|
|
|
Some good points of consideration 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
No one but you can really make that decision.
Personally, I've never been anywhere for 3.5 years and still like it there.
Even my first job where I had to learn programming from scratch and everything was new.
I left there after four years, which was a year too late in hindsight.
A new job always means you'll learn new things because they do things differently.
You'll get to meet new people who know and do different things.
And if you later regret your decision your current employer will likely want you back (provided you don't sh*t on your boss' desk on your way out  ).
|
|
|
|
|
I went through a period of about 5 years before this role of having several different roles one after the other, and felt the need to settle down for a bit. It's not like I haven't already worked for a wide variety of different people, environments, tech etc already in my 20+ year career. I feel I can contribute to the development team and business more now due to my greater understanding of them both. By always being on the move you never really get to know the software in any great detail. You're always the new kid on the block.
I've always left every employer on good terms. Never burn your bridges has always been an important adage for me (that person you bad mouthed may be your next colleague or manager).
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you made up your mind about staying?
Dominic Burford wrote: that person you bad mouthed may be your next colleague or manager
There are two people I really can't think of anything good to say and I warn people for them and if any of those people become my coworker again I'm quitting asap 
I have no need for such toxicity in my life.
|
|
|
|
|
I wish I had. This new role sounds really interesting and has got me really confused. One minute I think I've made a decision, then the next I've changed my mind. Both roles involve challenges, interesting work and a good managers.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Here's some generic, semi-deep nonsense wisdom that may pull you over the line.
"Never regret the things you didn't do" 
|
|
|
|
|
I like that 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
1. Pay : Almost Same
2. Commute : Almost same
3. Autonomy : Almost same
So it narrows down to 2 things. Are you ready to move from your comfort zone and start a new Job with various unknown factors which you cannot predict now?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
1) What can you foresee about your career in the current company? Do you think it's probable that you will rise in position or do you foresee a stable career in the same position? And in the other company?
An engaging career is often more important than other things, static places become narrow quite easily. A new position in a company usually gives more chances to gain a prominent role.
2) What can you know about the new company in terms of annual revenue, accumulated debt, size and year of foundation?
Going from a place that will stand up for long to one that in a couple of years risks bankruptcy ain't good.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
If you're happy where you are, and pay and commute are the same. Why do you want to change?
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't really looking to change. I got approached by an agency with the role, and it seemed interesting. I get approached all the time from agencies, and 99% of the roles don't interest me. But this one was local, matched my skills set, was paying well etc. So I agreed to an interview, which went better than I was expecting. So I have a good offer in front of me, as well as being happy in my current role. Hence the confusion.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
So it's basically down to whether you want the security of a safe and still good job.
Or if you'd like a new challenge.
Only you can answer that.
But if you believe you will get bored some time in the future, you better go for it. Otherwise you shouldn't.
|
|
|
|
|
How close to retirement are you? It sounds like you can stay where you are till then (I know I did that and stayed in the same position for 15 years after 20 years of being a consultant/contractor).
It really comes down to comfort and do you want to accept the challenge of starting all over again with a different company.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm more than prepared to move if I thought it was the right thing to do. Pushing my limits and setting myself challenges has defined my entire career. I even moved my family early on in my career to be nearer to a role.
Normally I would have instinctively have made up my mind by now either way. This time the decision seems more difficult as the pros and cons are so evenly matched.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
hello,
I currently have a GeForce GTX 460 graphics card which did its job nicely, but is getting outdated. I was looking to upgrade it, but there are so many options I have no idea what to look for.
I'm looking for a middle range type of thing, OK for playing today's games, some video processing, ... but it doesn't need to do hard labor.
I was looking into the GTX 1050 or GTX 1060 range of cards, but even there you have multiple versions ranging from 150 - 400 EUR (memory is pretty clear, but the other parameters that valid the price difference are not)
My main concern is:
a) it should fit in the same slot as my GTX 460 (I think that also uses 2 slots?)
b) my power bank should be able to handle it
any recommendations from the experts?
thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I am currently using a DUAL-GTX1060-6GB OC edition.
Bought it from amazon in November 2018 for $250.
Some times you get good offers like that. Keep an eye out, it is the Christmas season and these things go on sale.
|
|
|
|
|
don't forget to consider the box around the GPU, make sure it will work on modern hardware - the most popular slot of the day (of course also runs on your current box)
consider even the system, even if you are hard core windows-only now don't write off others [at least linux] so fast, you never know what your base o/s will be a year or two from now - maybe due to app/game choices, work-at-home, even o/s policy changes from ms (and others just as much).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming your budget goes that high I'll second the recommendation for a $230ish (US prices) 1660 super (roughly the same price as a standard 1660 but ~10% faster), or 1660 Ti ($280 but only 10% faster than 1660S).
The high priced 1060's are quasi-scammers massively marking stuff up because it's out of stock hoping to find a sucker who doesn't know any better. For the most part I'd recommend avoiding them at 1660S is ~35% faster than a 1060-6gb; and they generally start at about the same price.
The 1060-3gb is maybe an option if you can find a cheaper one around $180, but with only 3gb of ram is going to limit your ability to actually use the rest of the cards performance; and low ram cards tend to age much more poorly with time.
The 1050 and 1050Ti can both be found around $150, performance on both is about the same but the TI's got 4gb instead of 3; and is the one I'd recommend on a budget.
The 460 was a 150W card, which is more than any of the above so you shouldn't need to worry about if your PSU can run them.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
