|
|
|
Who writes the subtitles on the Code Project Daily News?
They really crack me up.
Example:
Scientists say they've found a way to solve the 'oldest open question in astrophysics' (3 body problem)
OK, now do four
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey[^] does.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
but does Kent Sharkey really exist? Same with Sean, does he really exist?
Part of me thinks these are aspects of Bob's split personality. 
It's much easier to enjoy the favor of both friend and foe, and not give a damn who's who. -- Lon Milo DuQuette
|
|
|
|
|
I do not.
Chris wrote me back in grad school. If I weren't still running on that PDP-11, I'd thank him. 
Sean on the other hand, is great. I think he's on the other rack though.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
If you ever reach MVP / MVE on CP, you'll know that Sean does indeed exist. And has the most deplorable taste in "clothes".
Mankinis are not a good look, and when he is standing there on your doorstep to deliver eth Certificate dressed only in a red mankini and a thin layer of oil, you do begin to wish he perhaps didn't. He is the reason why "Casual Friday" was banned in Toronto after just one week.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
 
It's much easier to enjoy the favor of both friend and foe, and not give a damn who's who. -- Lon Milo DuQuette
|
|
|
|
|
And the place for those news is: The Insider News[^] just in case you want to thank him personally.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
bleahy48 wrote: They really crack me up.
I think many people here are subscribed to the newsletter for exactly that reason
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the kind words - they keep me going some weeks.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you making us laugh for every news item. 
If you are not criticized, you may not be doing much.
|
|
|
|
|
Successfully broke Microsoft Ajax Minifier and YUI Compressor using ECMAScript (JS) 2015 (6) syntax for ComputedPropertyName in object creation...
See you next year... 
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
It's just like a rodeo, but instead of breaking a horse you are breaking the Minifier.
Maybe we should refer to you as "Bronco Peter" in the new year.
Yeehaaaah 
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Microsoft Ajax Minifier and YUI Compressor using ECMAScript (JS) 2015 (6) syntax for ComputedPropertyName in object creation.
this line here made my brain explode all over my monitor. 
It's much easier to enjoy the favor of both friend and foe, and not give a damn who's who. -- Lon Milo DuQuette
|
|
|
|
|
So I ran into the Dangling else[^] problem but I thought I could solve it using an open ended where constraint in my grammar, possibly enabling backtracking i wouldn't need who cares.
Anyway, turns out nobody usually tries to parse languages with LL based parser generators in part because of problems like this.
So there's no easy doc on how to adjust an LL parser to fix the problem, and my parser seems to be hanging up on it - by choosing the wrong one (either that or there's a bug somewhere else in my grammar), i haven't fully pinpointed it yet.
I don't know what to do. I can solve it using a virtual production (where I take over the parse) but i only want to use those as a last resort
I think I figured it out. There was a bug in my grammar that wasn't helping.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
modified 31-Dec-19 4:16am.
|
|
|
|
|
Fascinating. I always use curly braces so there's no ambiguity, so I tried:
class Program
{
public static string DanglingElse(bool a, bool b, string atrue, string btrue)
{
if (a) if (b) return btrue; else return atrue;
return "X";
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("false, false: " + DanglingElse(false, false, "A", "B"));
Console.WriteLine("false, true: " + DanglingElse(false, true, "A", "B"));
Console.WriteLine("true, false: " + DanglingElse(true, false, "A", "B"));
Console.WriteLine("true, true: " + DanglingElse(true, true, "A", "B"));
}
}
Resulting in:
false, false: X
false, true: X
true, false: A
true, true: B
So in C#, the else applies to the inner "if".
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Basically all C family languages do. It's part of the spec. Getting the parser to do it though?
With an LR parser all you do is override a shift reduce conflict.
With LL it's a bit more difficult. I ended up writing the parse for it by hand. I'm sure I didn't have to, but i didn't want to spend the extra time figuring out the )%)@$$ grammar constructs i could get it to actually eat
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
I actually can't think of any language that doesn't.
Python doesn't count.
|
|
|
|
|
Visual basic effectively disallows it because of the end if syntax (i think. i don't touch VB)
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Which is correct according to the documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
So now with Parsley parsers can call other parsers. You can import several grammars and delegate different parts of parse to them, like a compositional/composing parser would.
But unlike a compositional setup, it doesn't force you to use it, meaning that rather than forcing you to define your entire grammar like legos, you can just factor where you need to.
For example, I have slang's parsing broken up into expressions, statements, members/typedecls, and namespace/compile units.
This is awesome. For starters it allows you to use it such that you can parse individual statements and expressions as well as whole compile inits.
Second, and perhaps most importantly, this allows you to break your parse up into several different "parse tables"
This means that rules from expressions will not interfere or conflict with rules from statements, nor members and such.
This is super important for LL(1) parsing where it's easy to run into conflicts as soon as things get at all non-trivial.
I'm excited about this. I'm not sure if it's a totally new idea or not but I've never seen a parser generator that could do this.
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
Another article methinks for us mere mortals
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a bit of a ways from that. bugs and such
When I was growin' up, I was the smartest kid I knew. Maybe that was just because I didn't know that many kids. All I know is now I feel the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I just really want to understand the reason you write this sort of code ( my lack of comprehension kicks in here )
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
