|
They're gone from mine again, now, so that's a pretty damned complex caching error.
There's also something funny going on with the reply-notification badge, which keeps coming and going.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
CP caching weirdness has often been caused by each web server having its own cache that doesn't update at the same time as the others; their load balancer doesn't always return you to the same server so weird stuff(tm) happens.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Aha. I've caused that kind of problem myself, but it's one of those that isn't really worth "fixing".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm partial to the load balancer setting that pins a user session to a single webserver. Not foolproof but as long as you don't have highly variable user impact on server loads it hides the most confusing bits of the problem.
At least in theory. In practice while I've got a load balancer in front of my webserver for just in case, I've never actually needed to put a 2nd server behind it. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: as long as you don't have highly variable user impact on server loads
There's the rub. The times when the servers are most in use are (purely coincidentally, of course) the times when people complain most about lags. I'd think about it hard, before pinning sessions.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those are Dynamite, not fireworks.
It's the Interstellar Year of the Terrorist.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The Expanse?
after many otherwise intelligent sounding suggestions that achieved nothing the nice folks at Technet said the only solution was to low level format my hard disk then reinstall my signature. Sadly, this still didn't fix the issue!
|
|
|
|
|
That's next season: and probably next year... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The fireworks haven't reached me yet, but Chinese New Year is tomorrow - https://chinesenewyear.net/[^] - at least Bob doesn't have a pet Rat to celebrate with 
|
|
|
|
|
just saw the fireworks (refreshed)
where are the rats? specifically: Metal White Rats.
BTW: The exact new moon time is at 5:43 on 2020-01-25 in China's time zone.
after many otherwise intelligent sounding suggestions that achieved nothing the nice folks at Technet said the only solution was to low level format my hard disk then reinstall my signature. Sadly, this still didn't fix the issue!
|
|
|
|
|
Doh, was hoping for Stianless Steel!
|
|
|
|
|
And now there gone??
|
|
|
|
|
premature emojiculation?
after many otherwise intelligent sounding suggestions that achieved nothing the nice folks at Technet said the only solution was to low level format my hard disk then reinstall my signature. Sadly, this still didn't fix the issue!
|
|
|
|
|
You live in a different timezone to the rest of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but so does Bob ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. I live in a different world!
|
|
|
|
|
I know that, I've been there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe sidetracking, maybe not ...
These aliens bringing explosives. Our local discussion about a million martians turned into the question: Titan (the largest moon of Saturn) may be a more viable candidate for human settlement, because we can find lots of fuel there. Except we can't find oxygen to make it burn. It is useless to us.
Some of our explosives work because they carry their own oxygen in their chemical compounds. Those are "detonating", as opposed to exploding, devices. In an environment like that of Titan, with very little oxygen available, you would have to work hard to create detonating devices.
Black powder firecrackers depend on oxygen being available. We can probably conclude that Bob came neither from Mars nor Titan.
Any alien trying to attack / scare / impress us with explosives requriring oxygen should be met with enthusiasm: His world provides something essential to us! In fact, even detonators, carrying their own oxygen, show that there is oxygen available in the home environment of the alies, so we shouldn't reject them.
|
|
|
|
|
Way too long I've been chasing this, and the answer was right there in front of me. I've been overthinking this for years
foreach (var input in inputs)
{
var acc = new List<int>();
var ns = new List<FA>();
foreach (var state in mapKey)
{
FA dst = null;
if (state.InputTransitions.TryGetValue(input, out dst))
{
foreach (var d in dst.FillEpsilonClosure())
{
if (d.IsAccepting)
if (!acc.Contains(d.AcceptSymbol))
acc.Add(d.AcceptSymbol);
if (!ns.Contains(d))
ns.Add(d);
}
}
}
...
I didn't realize I could just make input a range. I thought I'd have to crack it apart into individual characters (kills perf on Unicode)
Pretty much all the lexer code I've written since rolex is now obsolete.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
This is totally lost on me unless you show us what's different.
|
|
|
|
|
Some of us will be lost regardless. 
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing about that particular code that is shown is different.
I changed the type of input
From char (one UTF-16 character)
to
KeyValuePair<int,int> (a range of UTF-32 characters)
Changing from UTF-16 to UTF-32 isn't the important bit though.
Changing from a single character to a range was.
Thing is, I thought I couldn't get away with it.
I thought I'd have to enumerate each value in the range and add each state on each value individually.
For reasons that would bore you and are wrong anyway. 
Edit: 
My reasons were right. This doesn't work. I was right the first time
Real programmers use butterflies
modified 24-Jan-20 10:51am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
