|
Sander Rossel wrote: I just got "Bored at the office?"
You know I am!
The CP ad technology can definitely read your mind any time it wants to so it can post an appropriate ad. I make all my major life decisions entirely based upon those ads now. 
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: I make all my major life decisions entirely based upon those ads now
|
|
|
|
|
This genuine news headline from Peta is actually a reasonable CCC:
"Coronavirus Outbreak Is Linked to Eating Animal Flesh" (11)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
of:
Carnivorous!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Correct. That must mean it's your turn to write the news headlines tomorrow. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I think I'll stick to the classics: Fog in the Channel[^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
How about the classic from 1930: There is no news[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
As in, the number of mouse clicks that I have to do every day, the same mouse clicks, over and over, because there's no "AI" that says "oh look, Marc just launched us, and he always does this..."
So, in Postman, just one example - Click on Import, Click on Raw Text, Click the edit box, Copy what's in my paste buffer, Click on Import, click on Send.
Seriously. WTF. Where is AI????
Or Outlook, where it doesn't auto-focus to the ONE AND ONLY textbox in some mindless dialog?
Sure, it's great that we have self-driving cars. What I really want is AI for my repetitive work life TO TAKE THE REPETITION OUT OF IT!!!
And you wonder why I roll my own. Code that is.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder when they start using AI to ?help? us in our everyday chores will they include common sense or will it be like real life? 
Monday starts Diarrhea awareness week, runs until Friday!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: will they include common sense or will it be like real life?
Brought the Babbage quote rushing to mind:
Charles Babbage: On two occasions I have been asked, – "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" ...
I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question!
|
|
|
|
|
And when you want to do something different I suppose you'd like the AI to second-guess what you're thinking?
Maybe there's two things you do (equally) - the AI will open up two instances for you! That's the ticket.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: And when you want to do something different I suppose you'd like the AI to second-guess what you're thinking?
DING! DING! DING! DING! DING! WE HAVE A WINNER!
That's exactly the problem with "AI". Frankly I'm already put off by software that tries to be too smart for its own good.
Remember when MS decided to have "collapsible" menus in Office, and it was supposed to learn what options you use the most often, and bring those options into the menus and hide the rest? The lesson MS learned in this case was that people immediately went looking for how to turn the "always show full menus" option back on.
|
|
|
|
|
They still have the bloody annoying "put the most-used (whatever) at the top" cr@p enabled by default, so that every time you go for something in a menu, it's in a different position.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah...not much "I" in that AI. Calling it as such is a bit of a stretch, but somebody still went through the extra steps to write code that does this. Not sure who asked for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Or have a dialog that comes up and says "I can see that you have {done these steps in this order} for {this situation}. Would you like for me to make that the default activity for {this situation}?" Give the user some interaction to take the repetitiveness way. A tool works best when it lets the user choose when to take shortcuts.
|
|
|
|
|
AFell2 wrote: "I can see that you have {done these steps in this order} for {this situation}. Would you like for me to make that the default activity for {this situation}?"
That would annoy the Hell out of me.
I'm Mark with a "k"; it's Marc with a "c" who wants Clippy back -- we have that on good authority*.
* It was on the Internet[^].
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
AI would be very unhelpful for that one time that you'd need to do something different; and you can already use something like AutoIt to script those boring tasks.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I think Marc just misses Clippy.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It's much easier to enjoy the favor of both friend and foe, and not give a damn who's who. -- Lon Milo DuQuette
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. When I open up a bug ticket it JIRA why can't it automatically add "Could you add reproduction steps?" to the comments and re-assign it back to the person that opened it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The BOFH in me would like nothing more than seeing our helpdesk support software automatically reject any customer help request that comes in without a log file attachment. The page users reach to submit support requests asks for it politely, our auto-responder reminds them of the same, yet people keep asking questions that we could immediately answer if we only had included a log. So it just creates some additional back-and-forth email exchanges.
|
|
|
|
|
The very fact that an entry like BOFH exists in wikipedia is proof of why this great system has destroyed all other encyclopaedias!
|
|
|
|
|
BOFH is a classic, how could it NOT have its own entry on Wikipedia?
|
|
|
|
|
To quote one of the Four Yorkshiremen, "Luxury".
In addition to getting half-assed (at best) descriptions of what is perceived as a problem, this organization refuses to quit pretending that email is a valid bug tracking tool.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
