|
ZurdoDev wrote: Back in the earlier part of the 1900s the US government encouraged people to own chickens and to plant gardens
Maybe offtracking a little bit, but I choose to risk it:
We have (and really have) an American employee: I happened to mention poultry farming, and he was very eager about it: That's simple, and provides great food at at low cost! ... He had a lot of practical advice on how to do it.
He is still working for us, after returning to USA to take care of his sick mother. After he left, I heard that when he was here, he regularly transferred most of his pay to his mother to cover her health expenses. The reason why he knew so much about poultry farming was that his family had been all dependent on their own poultry, not to starve. Yet, they were able to send one son to college to get a education, making him a top rate professional allowing him to go abroad to become a highly valued expert in his field. I guess that the family's sacrifices were great, to say the least.
A few years ago, the children's book Susan Patron: The Higher Power of Lucky[^] was awarded the Newbury Medal (awarded by the American Libary Association). The book is great, and funny! Read it! ... The society described is so poor, economically, that I wrote to the author asking how realistic the story is. She returned a very friendly response, confirming that in parts of the USA, daily life is most certainly at this level, in material "wealth". I started looking up the statistics of average family income in that area (semi-desert areas at the west coast, with a large native population) and realized that it was most certainly true.
Maybe it is not just in semi-desert and native areas. I spent a year in the Midwest as an exchange student, arriving from a rich, everybody-equal country. To some degeree, I "saw what I expected to see". Later, it struck me that at that time, I didn't really understand how much my host family sacrified in opening their home to exchange students (they had been host families for many years). They didn't take me in as a family member because they had resources to waste, but because they honestly wanted to share whatever they had got. It would be wrong to call them "poor", yet they were certainly not well-to-do - they were far from that!
When the US is promoted internationally, you may easily get the impression that everybody in the US are rich and successful. Poverty is so limited that you can ignore it. Today, slum has been eradicated ... Not! There is poverty, but US culture pushes strongly hide it, build a shield of make-pretend wealth. There is slum, but the successful world steers you away from it.
People in the US still have their hens in the backyard and grow vegetables in their back yard, not as a pleasant hobby but as their way to survive.
|
|
|
|
|
lopatir wrote: not interested in eating stale crap for the rest of the year because we panic bought anything in a tin.
I think that is one mistake a lot of people make. For most stuff (food in particular), you should not have an emergency store; it must be part of your ordinary chain of consumption. Take dried pasta: When you restock, you put it at the back of the shelf; today you eat that pasta bought two months ago. Similar with canned food, dried bread, bottled water or whatever.
I keep stocks roughly corresponding to how much I consume in half the typical "Best Before" period. Typical for canned food is a BB date two years into the future, so I may have up to one year's worth of, say, canned peas in my basement. Bottled water may hav BB in six months, so I keep a stock lasting 2-3 months.
If you live in a culture where most food is made directly from fresh ingredients, the read BB may be a few days into the future. That makes it a lot more difficult. Of course I also eat a lot of fresh food. If all supply lines are suddnely broken, it would definitely affect my household; it would have a lot higher fraction of vegetabels that can be stored for months (like carrots, rutabaga, beets) and less tomato and cucumber. The pasta supply which would normally last for four months migh be gone in two. Still, I would not be eating "other" food if supplies are unavailable, just more of what has a long shelf life.
|
|
|
|
|
Just make sure that you are prepared for a loss of electric power for at least a few days. What you keep in a deep freezer may still be edible after three or four days (if you do not open the lid too often); after a week, it has been thawed for too long to be healthy.
Your water kettle, coffee machine, SodaStream and electric stove will be useless when power is gone. If you have a gas stove, you may be out of luck as well: I was just about to buy myself a new one when I discovered that my selected model had a security mechanism requiring elecric power to open the gas valve. No electricity, no gas! (I found another model without this "security" feature!)
The second important thing you should be prepared to loose: Drinking water. Even if it is still running, it may be contaminated. With some contamination, you can boil it for a few minutes, but that doesn't go for all kinds. And maybe no water at all is available. Your dried foodstuff may be less useful then.
|
|
|
|
|
Sandy: Electric Gone; Gas Turned off for Safety; Water plant in my area literally blew up.
Solution? Live someplace else for a while. We can make due with very little. I've eyed some generators . . . but they require gasoline. That's a problem because the gas stations were inoperable (Sandy times) and, although they now have mandated electrical backup generators, they aren't any good if there are no fuel deliveries.
Just "get the hell out of Dodge" is the plan. Based on what's coming will determine where we go and what we take (vs. what we put in large plastic chests). A little food in the fridge will not be anything like a priority.
(oh, yes - there was bottled water hoarding, as well, for COVID-19 - a commodity I all but never buy).
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: Solution? Live someplace else for a while.
You probably realize that this is a "So why don't they eat cake, then?" type of response, You may have a second home within driving distance, that you can freely make use of. Lots of people have no such alternative.
If a pandemic is truly global (or at least nationwide), it makes no sense to invite yourself to a friend or relative. That could be the case even for natural disasters as well: Your friends and relatives may be as hard hit as you are. And the roads may be hit.
Lots of people do not have the opportunity to just go away for a period. Their work may not permit it. Maybe they have livestock, or maybe they do dogsledding as a hobby and have eight huskies to take care of.
Maybe authorities will restrict your freedom of movement as well. During Easter, a great share of the Norwegian population go up in the mountains, to their mountain cabins, to hotels, or the visit the large number of self-service cabins. Many of the small mountain villages increase their population by a factor of 5 to 6 during easter. The health services are dimensioned for the year-round needs. If 25,000 citypeople gather in a 5000 people village for exchange of corona viruse, it could lead to a major catastrophe. So, cabin owners were not allowed to spend Easter at their cabin as they always did before. That caused a major uproar among the cabin people!
So, while "Just go away for a while" may be a solution for a few people in a limited set of circumstances. I would guess that to the great majority of the population, the option is not available. To everybody, there may be circumstances where you have to stay at home, even if the alternative dwelling exists.
So, this "Just go
|
|
|
|
|
Member 7989122 wrote: You may have a second home within driving distance
I don't have a second home within any distance. Just where I live.
I mean leaving and heading to where I think it's safe, hopefully, ahead of the surge so there is such a place.
Where I live, livestock? Huskies? I had forgotten that you're still afraid to identify yourself as Norwegian with your CP ID (but don't hesitate to put it in posts). Explains the year supply of
foods by simply living in a refrigerator. Funny that your mountain area doesn't see fit to make allowances for the crowd who's money they're glad to take by building better medical facilities. Cancun (Mexico) had a tourist area: they redid the entire water system to make sure no further outbreaks occur. Medical facilities (for trauma, in particular) are quite available. They invest in their customers well-being - maybe your Norwegian resort areas should consider the same.
Quite simply, I've coped - for nine straight months - living with just a roof over my head and heat in the winter - and was glad to have it. Electricity was an added plus when it was restored. For what I had, I count myself lucky. I'm not going to do it a second time. Only a fool doesn't know when it's time to move on. Seeing one's home surrounded by (and containing) ocean gives one a very authentic perspective.
There may be no hiding from a pandemic - but utilities and such remain available. In general, I can stay put. As for destructive natural disasters? They are limited in scope. How far inland do you think a hurricane can get this far north, even with climate change? If one doesn't wait until the last minute, an hour or so drive takes one well away from whatever weather happens.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: I had forgotten that you're still afraid to identify yourself as Norwegian with your CP ID
Certainly not! I just accepted defaults!
If your interpretation of my postings is seriously affected by my nationality, then it is more your problem than mine. Remember, I might actually be from China ("which we call Red China"), which would more or less invalidate every argument I bring forth, wouldn't it?
If CP wants to introdue a "Nationality: unspecified", that is perfectly fine with me. I'll gladly enter that category. In the meantime: You are free to ask my nationality, if you need that information to judge the validity of my argruments. Just consider what would be the effect of me giving a dishonest answer - replying that my arguments come from a US citizen vs. coming from a Chinese. If that affects your judgement of the arguments, it as more to do with you than with me.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 7989122 wrote: If your interpretation of my postings is seriously affected by my nationality, then it is more your problem than mine.
No - I remember my first time in Europe. For a while we traveled with a Canadian and a Scotsman. The Canadian would wear a shirt with an USA flag on it and he behaved rather badly. People who saw him blamed "the Americans" - and that is what you're doing. "Default" - a pretty lame excuse at this point: fix it! Or do I detect you are imitating that errant Canadian?
Member 7989122 wrote: I might actually be from China ("which we call Red China"), which would more or less invalidate every argument I bring forth, wouldn't it?
Politely put, this argument is blithering nonsense.
Member 7989122 wrote: If CP wants to introdue a "Nationality: unspecified",
Now I don't encourage people to just wave their national flag for some weird ego boost - but this just emphasizes your reluctance to simply correctly identify your location, and now, it seems, you've made it a point of pride, you will resist fixing your own error and come up with absurd excuses and justifications . . . as in this post. Reminds me of kid. "I used the default" == "The dog ate my homework"
Or perhaps it's just a deep seated desire on your part to migrate to North America which you can't quite seem to hide.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not a problem I've encountered (yet).
I assume those packages are hosted on a private feed? Are you using the Azure DevOps "Artifacts" option, or something else?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Azure DevOps "Artifacts"
Home grew code hosted as Azure DevOps artifacts to share with all developers and projects...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
The best of it, that MS totally ignores the fact that to make it work I only have to 'downgrade' my VS... It still my job to investigate, otherwise it is a not a problem at all...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Although Greg had been posting his clues, responses were few. I guess they were either too hard or nobody is playing (for me they were too hard).
By the looks of it, Werewolf2 (whoever that used to be) should have taken back over today as Greg went 3 days unsolved.
Anyway, unless somebody has a better idea, I am going to get CCC back on track by posting a nice easy one at 9am tomorrow. The winner of which will be up on Tuesday (as it's bank holiday Monday).
If nobody solves tomorrows (and it will be super easy!), then we can assume nobody is playing anymore and we can put it on hold for a while.
Alternatively, if y'all have a better plan, then feel free to put me in my place 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm nearly up to it mentally, so I'll be back in play probably next week.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
See what happens around here when you go AWOL? It all falls apart!
Also, if you can't get tomorrows then I think we are just going to have to call it and pull your plug. It's the kind thing to do.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought my last one wasn't too bad. It was just going to be a straight double definition, in which case it would've probably been solved within minutes, with the help of a dictionary if need be.
I did mention Werewolf2 being up today along with yesterday's answer, but he hasn't posted since his last CCC 6 days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: I thought my last one wasn't too bad
Well it was still too hard for me!  Then again, I am not great at solving them anyway.
If Werewolf2 turns up then they can decide if they want to do it... but next full moon isn't until June so not holding much hope for that.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not very good at them either, whether solving or setting!
|
|
|
|
|
As an outside observer, I detect a clear conspiracy. What?
Well I've seen a rumbling, now and then (see a rumbling because posts must be read) about how C has outlived its usefulness. That's the beginning of the tale. And some even tout that for C++.
Now, of course, you see it. Take 'C'; add a couple more C's (as in ++) and you have your CCC. There is clearly a movement afoot to usurp the position.
It may be, if you post something like PythonPythonPython it will receive better attention.
The only other logical alternative is something like CCC[^].
All that being said, as an outside observer I can only hypothesize. I don't even know how it's done/played/used. Also, by the time I get up in this beloved time zone, someone seems to have done with it whatever is supposed to be done.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
modified 21-May-20 7:31am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I know 3 Spaniards that would agree with you.
|
|
|
|
|
Just got notified of VS update 16.6 - 2.31 GB ! insane
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps because Windows Forms Designer for .NET Core Released | .NET Blog[^]?
It should be included in VS2019 v16.6.
2.31 GB is still a lot though.
Bigger than any WinForms project I could make, that's for sure
<edit>
Just updated mine and it's "only" 1.48 GB for me, going from 16.5.5 to 16.6.
</edit>
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have any NuGet problem either with 16.5.5 or 16.6?
The Lounge[^]
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, my only problem with 16.5.5 was that when I went to "View -> Other windows" (from the menu at the top) it would crash Visual Studio 
It's not something I use a lot, but it happens.
In fact, it happened to me earlier this week, that's why I updated to 16.6 asap.
The problem seems to be fixed now.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
