|
I'm running a Windows Server 2012 R2 VM using 1 processor core and 8192 MB memory for the VM and it works pretty snappy most of the time. I'm running the same chip as you but I have 32 GB of memory.
I ran this exact VM on an older Mac with the same settings and only 16GB memory on an older chip. The VM on the new Mac is slightly better than the old machine but really "Just Noticeable Difference"
Running VMWare Fusion 11.5.6, updated recently when it was available.
|
|
|
|
|
MarkTJohnson wrote: using 1 processor core and 8192 MB memory
1, that sounds too less, but I will give a try with 2 processor - 8GB memory. thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 Ghz ... haven't run less than 3.4 on my main machine in years. Also, Browsers are not your friend if you like to have a lot of tabs (i.e. processes) open. The GPU plays a role in other than just graphics; more is better. Overall, it would seem you are under-powered for the task at hand.
(Your SSD / HD configuration matters too if all your activity is on your swap drive).
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: 2.3 Ghz ... haven't run less than 3.4 on my main machine in years.
Well, thats the company laptop config.
Gerry Schmitz wrote: (Your SSD / HD configuration matters too if all your activity is on your swap drive).
Neh, office laptop. Single hard disk and nothing of swap drive work.
|
|
|
|
|
..but when I entered I could not see anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like the sort of thing I wouldn't want to get entangled with.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
You just need to tell them to stop looking at you!
|
|
|
|
|
This is a free state!
Not at all, you must follow Fermi-Dirac laws.
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody asked for seconds.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
|
...It was open Mike night!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference. Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Some of us are eating - have a heart.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Two cannibals were eating a clown when one of them said “Does this taste funny to you?”
|
|
|
|
|
Did you have a gut feeling about this or just planned to cut and run if things didn't work out?
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Live and let liver, I say.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Live and let liver,
Shouldn't that be "Live and Let Die"?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Live and let liver, I say. with some fava beans and a nice Chianti Ffffffffff
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Not so easy, it takes brains to cook that particular dish!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference. Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
... well, on android smartphones, is getting out of hands ! I think that you need at least decent 32Gb for the OS to run stable with Chrome as a browser, and even 64Gb if you want it to last a bit. My current smartphone is running really well, but has "only" 16Gb memory. 13,8Gb are eaten by Android itself (7Gb) and other mandatory apps from the Google ecosystem which I have no use of (about 7Gb as well). The remaining 2,2Gb are barely sufficient to allow the smartphone to run properly, since android heavily relies on swapping to run.
A google play update usually takes up additional 100 to 200Mb, and that happens every other month. At that pace, I can throw away my smartphone in about 4 months due to lack of ROM. (And yes, I moved everything movable to a SD card).
I wonder how it is possible that there are still smartphones sold with 8Gb or 16Gb memory, knowing that this is not sufficient to even use the bare smartphone after a few months... And the fact that everything relies on built-in memory instead of SD is just insane.
Now that I think about it, it is actually similar to a laptop I bought for my son last year with a 128Gb SSD with the OS and a 1Tb disk for data. Windows takes up 123Gb (!!!) by now on the SSD drive, and since some programs insist on putting at least minimum installation files under program files on that same disk, I am now more or less forced to upgrade this disk to a 500Gb SSD.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a 3 GB ram phone (with 32 GB internal storage), it never happened that I crossed the 2 GB usage...
I do not use Chrome, but Firefox. Use Email, WhatsApp, Waze, Gmail and phone as phone in daily basis...
At his very moment I use 60% of the 3 GB and 22% of the 32 GB...
You may investigate the actual usage (per-app)...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: with 32 GB internal storage
I am talking about internal storage here - I can't believe that you have only 8Gb (22%) of your internal storage with android + play + Gmail + ... I have about twice as much with the same setup.
BUT you have 32Gb, not 16Gb anyway
|
|
|
|
|
Services Google Play takes only 246 MB and Google Play only 86 MB on my phone for instance (all updated for latest before check)...
That's alone a huge difference... I do not know why...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting (I have 8.0.0). And since there is absolutely no details as to what "Service Google Play" exactly is, no way to check what is eating up that much space on my phone
I also noticed that the YouTube app takes up 440Mb after empyting the cache. I do not even use it and cannot be uninstalled (since part of Google).
Damn.
|
|
|
|
|
Google play services are all the backend APIs that sit between the OS and apps. They were carved out from the OS something like a decade ago so that your phone wasn't frozen on the API level it came out with at release; but instead its apps could get most new features added with newer android versions. Also because taking them out of AOSP meant that Amazon Kindle tablets wouldn't have them, making porting apps harder.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|