|
Damn printers. Real men draw everything using pen and paper. It took me a while to learn, but now I can redraw a screenshot on paper for 30 seconds. In color. Even if it’s from a pr0n site.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
It takes me 30 seconds to draw a stick figure...
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
|
|
|
|
|
Using pen and paper, or using THE pen on a snow?
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Pen and paper - drawing in yellow snow takes a lot longer!
(and is messier to correct)
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on who is helping you.
(from an old joke)
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but did you see red bucket or trolley?
|
|
|
|
|
Only a trolley - all my red buckets disappeared under mysterious circumstances a few weeks ago...
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: It could be a pair of dead carts?
I had to read that twice before it registered correctly in my brain, I thought it read:
"It could be a pair of dead cats? " 
Must must be the moon phase or some carp like that.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: some carp like that
It sure as hell ain't! You sir are on cod project. 
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Can we say crap? Oops.. I was concerned about keeping it KSS.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: some carp like that.
Smells a little fishy to me.
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Typical UI fail. How fricking hard would it have been to say "Cyan cartridge in magenta slot". Dumbasses.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
You should have called Q for assistance.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Where is Mr. Dalek Dave?
It appears he was right all the time. Here is the proof:
The proof[^]
I think some people owe him an apology.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh my god! We actually have two moons and the Government have been covering this up?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
If we step(pun not intended) on the Occam's razor this appears to be the only logical explanation.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
A frustrated father told a work colleague: "When I was a youngster, I was disciplined by being sent to my room without supper. But in my son's room, he has his own color TV, computer, games console, cell phone and CD player." "So what do you do?" The father replied: "I send him to my room!"
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Good one!
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: "So what do you do?" The father replied: "I send him to my room!"
Where I have a TV, computer, porn, liquor,... 
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: Where I have a ... computer,
FTW! 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see you bought the upgrade. I'm still using the one that came with pebbles and a paper bag.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: I see you bought the upgrade
Gotta have the latest gizmos, it's the eyeStone IV, but they're coming out with the eyeBabbage soon and I want one!
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: It's one of them new laptops[^]
Why does that site call itself ComputerWorld, when all it does is harp on about the few contributions the US made to the history of computers?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Because the subject is the world of computers. There are no countries in the world of computers, there are just computers.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
There are no countries other than the US in that article, despite the fact that the US didn't contribute a disproportionate amount to the history of computers.
The article isn't "computerWORLD", it's "computerLOOK-AT-US!", and it's not about the history of computing, it's about the history of the few contributions by the US, and tries to give the impression that that's all there was
It's biased and misleading crap, that leaves out everything in the hope of making one country look better -- y'know, just small things like the fact that the targeting computers they so proudly hold out as a sign of US dominance in computing were designed by the Royal Navy before the battle of Jutland, little stuff like that.
And try getting the point before making comments; it makes communication more effective.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
