|
Rage wrote: but nobody but from the staff can directly close an account
 We can definitely close accounts.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
"nobody but from the staff"
I included you in the staff. 
[Edit] Or does the phrase "nobody but someone" mean exactly the opposite of what I intended to say ? I meant "nobody apart from the staff can close accounts.". [This ten seconds of English idioms formulation were kindly given to you by the GYGRO, get your grammar right! Organisation].
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm doubling the number of reports needed to close an account.
I'm on the fence with this one though. Some people simply cause a lot of needless running around for the sake of causing a lot of needless running around.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, a lot of people just jump on the bandwagon in complaining about someone on something when they see others do it too. Similarly, everyone starts playing childish games like "who walked where in the morning seeing what" (yesterday's Lounge posts or before) and building up post after post after post of drivel. It's mob mentality whichever direction it's going. However, if someone doesn't like it, they should just ignore it.
Maybe it's time to add a blocked list for users so that we can avoid drivel from people. I'm sure I'll make the cut too. 
|
|
|
|
|
There's a reason I don't frequent the lounge much anymore. There are still some great post but they do get lost in the drivel. I still like the forums though.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here too. Cheers !!!
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I'm concerned, some people should be stripped of the right to report.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm also on the fence here: doubling the time to close an account is a PITA because it at least doubles the time it takes so kick the Love Guru back to where he belongs...
Perhaps what we need is a graduated Kick? Similar to the graduated effect of an up or down vote?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Perhaps what we need is a graduated Kick? Similar to the graduated effect of an up or down vote?
Is this the same as the term 'Weight' used here[^]?
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
No, no, no.
"Weight" is the right word... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
 Alright. Then you have to decide which category you will determine the Weight from. It seems obvious to do that based on the Organiser level, but there are a lot of Platinum Organisers out there.
I was looking at the Privileges tab. It does not show what it takes to be able to report a member profile, but if it follows the "Report a forum message" privilege, perhaps simply raising the Debator level needed could alleviate some of these cases.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately that means it is more difficult to remove the real spammers. Could we not have weighted voting on the spam button?
|
|
|
|
|
Not even more difficult but it may also let accounts of article spammers stay active. When a spam article has been rejected the member account is not visible anymore if the article has not been reported in the Spam and Abuse Watch forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted voting will actually make the issue worse.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, another idea is to just block a person from that forum for a few months. If s/he spams 2 or 3 forums and gets blocked from there too, then you deactivate his account.
|
|
|
|
|
Spammers use throw away accounts. Banning simply isn't effective.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for bringing this up. Chris helped me by activating my account back 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Although I am already quite some time on codeproject, this is my first time that I entered a workspace. I was in this workspace and I pressed the 'get ZIP'. Then I entered into my codeproject settings, I saved my settings over and over, but I keep returning to the settings, and thus I am not able to download.
Am I doing something wrong? Can you help me?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
If you need the code urgently, you can also just pull a copy from the Git Repository[^].
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, this might be the situation if you are not logged in into ::Workspaces. It is a bug on our side, we will fix it.
In meantime, what I can offer is a workaround: visit workspaces.codeproject.com directly, sign in there. Once you are signed in to ::Workspaces and visit the mentioned workspace 'Get ZIP' should work fine. Sorry for inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
The fix is deployed, it should work better now.
|
|
|
|
|
In this thread I can't see the message of Mike. When clicking on the title it opens nothing...
http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?fid=1159&tid=4782948[^]
I have latest Chrome...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Works fine for me in IE, FF, and Opera.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
I looked into the HTML and saw that the row with _h1 suffix completely missing...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
