|
Yes 
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
|
|
|
|
|
I see Chris's notification bug fix hasn't deployed yet...dammit! 
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
That's what it's all about!
|
|
|
|
|
And wouldn't you know as soon as I put my left foot in I gotta take it right back out. WTF?
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Be warned, as you're breaking your addiction, at some point you're gonna shake it all about
|
|
|
|
|
That's just the parkinsons kicking in.
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody stick the left boot in.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
My future wife experienced screen sharing for first time. She was amazed. Everything of this sort comes under the word online for her. Being a medical professional, I do not really expect much from her. She wants to learn some programming for she can make her own website. Life is going to be fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless she kills you one night... one to many 404 errors 
I despise web programming.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
d@nish wrote: My future wife experienced screen sharing for first time.
I was on a google hangout call a year or so ago with 3 other people. Blew me away, how you could see everyone, and whoever was speaking got the main window focus. It was fast and in sync, which I cannot say for Skype or, actually, subsequent Hangout calls. Maybe the people who were on the call were in high bandwidth areas (I know one was in SF.)
Anyways, I've been in this industry for years, I worked on video surveillance over the phone (using 14.4K modems and custom encryption algorithms), seen the 'net grow and grow, and frankly, I am still blown away by the fact that I can chat and see the people I'm chatting with in real time.
Why any "desk" job requires a 100% on site presence (or even 10%) with all this tech is absolutely beyond me. But don't get me started.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Please. We recently got telecommute supervised and I am full of hatred.
|
|
|
|
|
I like telecommute if I am working more than 40 hours.
Otherwise, its nice to have a reason to leave the house, see people you wouldn't normally interact with, and be available for in person meetings.
I worked at home for 2 years, I will never do it again.
I felt as if I should always be at my desk working, no matter how much I had worked that week. And unfortunately, I still have that feeling even though I do close to 0% telecommuting now.
That's just my experience.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with you 100%, Marc. There is absolutely no reason for me to be in the office, but they keep expecting me to show up. Hopefully I won the Powerball lottery tonight and won't have to show up again on Monday. Well, in truth, I might feel compelled to show up, just to gloat.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
My car pooler and I had a deal. If either won the Powerball, they would immediately charter a limo to pick up the other party for the next morning, and have the same service for the return trip. The first duty for the other party was to notify the winner's manager that they would not be in, ever. That way the winner would not have to get up early to make that wonderful phone call.
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Recent changes in Microsoft software is leaving me worried
From:
Office going to a subscription model , even though nothing really new has been added and Office 2007 still serves it purpose perfectly Bought it for $200 where I now have to spend that same amount every 15 months.
Windows 8 changing everything users were familiar with to windows 8.1 bringing back things cut from windows for no apparent reason.
Windows 8 prioritizing a tablet based layout making no consideration the amount of laptops and desktops is huge in comparison to tablet sales
Now in the past I made no secret of my absolute infuriation with Internet explorer and it looks like they are at it again
http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/18/technology/internet-explorer-name-microsoft/[^]
And all I can think of is "brilliant another default operating system bound browser which will be a compulsory baby sitting job filled with javascript and CSS layout issues that will be completely different from the fixes done in every major release of IE,and if they really want to make my day cause the same detection issues introduced with IE10 and IE11 making me spend my precious time jumping between different PC's and VMS testing different versions of IE and tweaking my CSS and Browser Files like a jenga tower instead of focusing on functionality and business logic" YAY!
I wish there is something we as developers can do to put a permanent stop to these unwanted and unnecessary security risks and changes Microsoft keeps shoving down our throat.
Chona1171
Web Developer (C#), Silverlight
|
|
|
|
|
Chona1171 wrote: Office going to a subscription model , even though nothing really new has been added and Office 2007 still serves it purpose perfectly Bought it for $200 where I now have to spend that same amount every 15 months
Agree.
I remember when Windows 95 released and I was developing software and Gates was talking about this and I thought it was a terrible idea which only cost users more and really offered no great benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
newton.saber wrote: Office 20073 still serves it purpose perfectly
|
|
|
|
|
I hate the subscription model. No, I take that back, hate is too weak of a word. Mark my words I'll stop using Office personally if it's forced upon me and I'll likely convince my employer to do the same. Adobe has already lost my future money with their BS Creative Cloud nonsense. I'll use CS6 until it stops working.
|
|
|
|
|
I completely agree , the subscription model is nothing but a huge pain and serves no benefit other than lining the pockets of execs with money for products end users already bought.
Usually new versions of software was written tested and so jam packed with new features to give end users incentive to upgrade, If the choose now once they start using a product the company does not need to do anything new and still gets paid. Money for nothing is a drain on everyone.
Chona1171
Web Developer (C#), Silverlight
|
|
|
|
|
tgrt wrote: I'll use CS6 until it stops working.
I heard that! Unfortunately that time may arrive sooner than later. I have seen the world utterly transformed from the one I started my career in and I've got a persistent suspicion that not that long from now, no binary assembly will be able to execute on any retail computational device without first phoning home to a license server and passing/authenticating digital signatures and other verification gates.
This is not a brave new world that I want to live in!
|
|
|
|
|
There is something you can do. If you don't like the produkt, then don't buy it. Or rent it. Or whatever.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
I hold an A-7 computer expert classification, Commodore. I'm well acquainted with Dr. Daystrom's theories and discoveries. The basic design of all our ship's computers are JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
|
Chona1171 wrote: Office going to a subscription model
I still have Office 2010 around (or earlier) and I certainly will not continue past Office 2012 if I have to use a subscription model. OpenOffice is decent enough for my needs.
Chona1171 wrote: Windows 8 changing everything users were familiar with to windows
I will never use Windows 8 on any of my machines. If I am forced to for work reasons, it'll be on a dedicated box and f*** metro.
Chona1171 wrote: Now in the past I made no secret of my absolute infuriation with Internet explorer
I've got Chrome, Firefox, and Opera installed. What's Internet Explorer???
Chona1171 wrote: I wish there is something we as developers can do to put a permanent stop to these unwanted and unnecessary security risks and changes Microsoft keeps shoving down our throat.
You can. It's called Linux. And why not? Much as I actually think Linux desktops are POS's, they ARE still viable "work" platforms and the sooner "we as developers" stop developing for Microsoft, the sooner they will hear the silence.
Why, in fact, companies actually pay license fees for Windows and SQL Server (or Oracle) is actually beyond me at this point -- in other words, I'm sure there are good cases, but the vast majority of users have simply been sucked into the Microsoft Way. Not to mention developers, inhaling with glee whatever crap Wxx "technology" Microsoft throws at them next.
Maddening.
I await your rebuttals! 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you that if more of us developed for Linux, eventually it would make a dent...problem is big corporate clients insist on being communicated with via Excel & Word docs...and a lot of them do all their scheduling and communicating with Outlook and presenting with PowerPoint...you'll be left out in the cold if you don't *obey*. Having said that, I'm staying on Office 2010 for the foreseeable future. If someone built .NET scripting into Open Office / Libre Office, that would seriously tempt me
The Linux platform would help its cause immensely if it would settle on the *one* desktop combining all the best features of all of them. I only use Linux in console mode myself, usually to run LAMP stacks. Arch Linux is my current favorite, I've used CentOS and OpenSuSE as well (gave up on SuSE when they abandoned Mono).
|
|
|
|
|
It's not whether more of us develop for Linux. It's if more people adopt and use Linux which people aren't going to do. It's a bit of a learning curve for many and I somehow think the day of Linux being number one is long gone. Companies won't move to Linux because they won't make money and if Microsoft gives away the OS for free, why would anyone try Linux in a mainstream level?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Android is a Linux ...add some printing, etc. and you're almost there.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
