|
I down-voted you; this should be in its own forum!!!! 
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
But why? We have only about 16 topics in the Longue for the past 8 hours. How may forums to open for these 16 threads?
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a clue "Your PC will restart several times. Sit back and relax."
Except of course that's sideways because they decided to put it on my Portrait monitor rather than my Landscape... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Did you click on a strange thing in the notifications section of the task bar?
|
|
|
|
|
No, I edited the registry and told it to pull it's damn finger out...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Your PC will restart several times
Re wiring your house?
|
|
|
|
|
Visiting some of "those" sites?
|
|
|
|
|
"This afternoon"?
This is an overnight job. Seriously, start it, walk away...
|
|
|
|
|
Word of the day; Is this you? IntexticatedNew version: WinHeist Version 2.1.1 new web site.
I know the voices in my head are not real but damn they come up with some good ideas!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got
===
Got it on the first take a load off Anne of Green Gable played Rhett Butler did it in the kitchen cups concupiscent curds and whey to gorillas in the mistake and eggs benedict arnold toynbee in your bonnet is a hoodlumbago.j. Simpson of a guns and rose maddox in a row to hoedown yonder in the Bayou country, but you don't mess around with Jim Croce
sang I've Got
|
|
|
|
|
This really needs a downvote button! Total gibberish! 
How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling that might be the point. Still, the subject remains the same - just ignore if it offends you.
|
|
|
|
|
So I started working for a new company in San Diego 3 1/2 months ago. I'm working as a contractor for another month or so, then I come in full time. I really love this new company.
However, my actual employer is out of Boston. They are a firm that supplies developers to other companies. Since the day I started their on-line timesheet app has not worked. Entires are not saved, various issues entering job code, etc..
Finally it stopped working altogether. Now, when I click the link I get an error page showing
"Object reference not set to an instance of an object."
My first thought was someone didn't null check a references. Should be a fairly easy fix.
That was 4 weeks ago.
In the meantime I have been tracking my hours in Excel and sending that in and they enter it for me. They've finally screwed up my pay... Mailed me a check and then direct deposited TWICE the amount the following week... I was paid TWICE for the same week.
Finally, yesterday I get an email from the main contact there which she was forwarding from their IT tech support:
Hey Mary,
I tried logging in with his credentials. Please have him try the following.
Username = kevin@blahblah.com
Password = GXXXXXXXXXXX (capital G)
Let me know please!
The email address and password WERE SENT IN THE CLEAR in an email!!!!!
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
modified 12-Aug-15 11:04am.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: They've finally screwed up my pay... Mailed me a check and then direct deposited TWCIE the amount the following week... I was paid TWCIE for the same week.
I fail to see what the problem is... 
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
Right?
The extra money is sitting in savings earning (a tiny bit of) interest until they take it back.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: out of Boston
Well, that certainly narrows it down. 
I think I have an idea for a time-keeping system. Have everyone make a CP membership and tell HR the name. Every morning, log into CP and post an "I'm here" message in your personal forum, then add replies as the day goes along -- out for lunch, back from lunch, etc. HR can then scrape everyone's entries to get the punches. Simple. 
|
|
|
|
|
"Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted."
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Old quote:
'Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement'.
|
|
|
|
|
Right now reading this book about Neuron Network in C#[^], yeah! 
Ok, I have to say it does help me go into a subject which has always been nebulously mysterious until thus far, so.. it must be good right?
On the other hand the book is somewhat obscure (luckily I am very keen to understand WTF is going on!!), it is riddled with very average programming and... really really poor math!
I mean where in the world the derivative of 1 / (1 + exp(-x)) is even remotely related x * (1 - x) ?!?
Well in the book that's where[^]!!  
|
|
|
|
|
If you pick x as Sigmoid(actualX) it's fine
|
|
|
|
|
not sure what you mean...
far from 0 this function is approximate to (const) 1, hence its derivative is approximately 0, and it its integration function (not sure of English name) would be x (is it what you mean?).
but:
1. x is the approximation of the .. integration (? not sure of name), not the derivative
2. -x^2 != x, where -x^2 is the value he suggest
3. -d^2 + d (the value he suggest) has 0s for x = 0,1, 1/(1=exp(-x))'s derivative has no 0, i.e. it behave very differently
[EDIT]
Ho, I just got it!
You suggest I could use (x) as activation function, right?
No worries, it's even in the book!
You just confused me with your terse off topic answer!
modified 12-Aug-15 10:44am.
|
|
|
|
|
If that sigmoid thing is s(x) = 1/(1 + exp(-x)) then its derivative is s(x) * (1 - s(x))
So either the author of that code was confused and mixed his x's and s(x)'s, or it's correct but used in a way that is not immediately obvious from that implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
Ho... I see...
what a strange notation hey!
And from the book so far it's not obvious that is what was needed!
Thanks, might help me in my deciphering more of the book tonight!
|
|
|
|
|
I found out the guy right next to me at my new job is on codeproject. Not sure his username.
Elephant elephant elephant, sunshine sunshine sunshine
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
