|
Odd that it took you 4 weeks to get the DUNS as their own information says 5 business days.
|
|
|
|
|
It could've been some administrative on our side too, since my friend handled it.
But i know others have said it took them this long too.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Rad, I'm using your password generator with my Galaxy S7.  Works great except for a few little glitches. Nothing major, just little annoyances. Let me know and I can pm you with the details.
When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others.
Same thing when you are stupid.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Donathan.Hutchings wrote: Hey Rad, I'm using your password generator with my Galaxy S7.
That is so nice of you to even try it. I really appreciate you trying it out and for messaging me.
Absoutely, PM the details and I will attempt to fix things ASAP.
Thanks again, for letting me know.
|
|
|
|
|
So, big deal. It helps prevent a lot of malicious software making it into the app store. Work on your app while waiting.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
You're right. I actually do agree with you and it looks like my complaining paid off. 
I just checked my email and I've been accepted into the appledev program.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: it looks like my complaining paid off
Well, it is Christmas.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, Apple makes you jump through more hoops. With Apple, you will need to renew your developer license every year, re-publish your apps with renewed certificates every year, and go through longer wait periods for your app to get reviewed. It can be a pain. However, Google Play virtually does nothing to verify your app other than scan it for viruses before allowing it to go through to the store. No real person ever looks at it in my experience, while I know Apple looks at it because Apple has a test account that I setup under my apps and I can see when they last logged in (and they've asked me follow up questions). So from developer standpoint, you might think Google Play is better because you don't have to do so much, but from a consumer point-of-view, I have a higher comfort level with Apple knowing someone is taking a look at the app to make sure it is what the developer says it is and it isn't some kind of malware.
|
|
|
|
|
That's great information about how the Apple Dev account works.
Thanks and I do agree with you on the safety issues.
At least the app store items are vetted and once you get there consumers have a bit more trust in the app. That's always good for those of us who are doing legit work.
|
|
|
|
|
Apple hates developers as far as I can tell. Haven't gotten to the play store yet. Had some apps in the Microsoft store – – very easy.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: I paid ($99USD)...
And that's per year, correct?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
That's correct. FYI- Mine was a little more, because tax was included.
|
|
|
|
|
Just saw a post announcing a new PHP Obfuscator[^].
Surely that's a tautology?
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
How could they not include an example. That's the only thing I clicked that link for.
|
|
|
|
|
Me too, there is a demo page if you scroll down.
|
|
|
|
|
But it has a captcha and I'm lazy
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have a solution for laziness I'm afraid. At least it's not one of those 'select all pictures with a tree in' or whatever, where you always miss one.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought PHP was already obfuscated? 
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
what do you think this perfectly legal C# does?
i => new Func<Func<int,int>,Func<int,int>>(ac => x => x == 0 ? 1 : x * ac(x – 1))(new SelfApplicable<Func<Func<Func<int,int>,Func<int,int>>,Func<int,int>>>(y => f => x => f(y(y)(f))(x))(y => f => x => f(y(y)(f))(x))(ac => x => x == 0 ? 1 : x * ac(x – 1)))(i)
|
|
|
|
|
If you print it out and lay it on the floor...follow it with your feet and it's the Texas two step.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
Something that's illegal in 17 of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Norway, Lichtenstein, and on the island of Guam?
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Semi-moan against the lack of good quality business cards and surface mount components. I went to meet an agent (?) yesterday and was given one of her business cards. Good quality card stock (0.53 mm thick!) now I need to remember what I needed a 0.55 mm shim! I know in these digital days such things as business cards are irelevant but can get retasked. My big bitch is about surface mount PCB's some times they are designed to be hard to fault find, impossible to repair, or your repair causes more damage than was present in the first place. This is at odds with the current culture of repair and reuse and no one seems to be taking issue with it. I seem to remember there was a bill placed in the US house of representives about the right to repair, I wonder how far it got?
|
|
|
|
|
Current culture of repair and reuse seems to apply to things like furniture, clothes, but not to electronics where cheap Chinese imports along with the speed in which things become obsolete make things too cheap to be worth repairing.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but has anybody thought about the actual damage done in China and the fact that the planet is running out of Aluminium, Tantelum & other stuff, dumping the bits once all the 'useful' stuff has been removed...
|
|
|
|
|
Of course not, out of sight out of mind.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
