|
HobbyProggy wrote: Don't you hate it when someone throws a fridge on you?
Trouble with the missus? 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it happens to everyone 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I need some help and it's kind of urgent.
How can I learn something?
I have tried Googling (ended up on YouTube), watching series on Netflix and even cleaning my room!
Somehow I just can't seem to learn!
A little help would be much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Obligatory Homer Simpson!!! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
How do I induce you into posting the link to that Q&A ?
Or - perhaps convince the all-power "CM" to place it as a fixture atop the QA area?
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Many questions are more like Ned's Parents[^]. 
Quote: We've tried nothing, and we're all out of ideas.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
If I didn't say anything I couldn't have not said it better. +
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
So I was doing some testing of LetsEncrypt certificates on my machine at home and couldn't open a listener to port 443.
TaskManager -> Network -> Listening Ports
Skype port 443 TCP/UDP
Why is Skype listening on 443? 
From SO:
To turn off and disable Skype usage of and listening on port 80 and port 443, open the Skype window, then click on the Tools menu and select Options. Click on the Advanced tab, and go to the Connection sub-tab. Untick or uncheck the checkbox for Use port 80 and 443 as an alternative for additional incoming connections option. Click on the Save button and then restart Skype to make the change effective.
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Been there. Done that. It sucks.
On the other hand, you have different fingers. - Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at this years ago. I think it's part of how skype can work around firewalls and routers. I remember being impressed with the ingenuity of it all, and then a bit alarmed about what it implied - when your firewall is not a firewall.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
This is one of about 700 reasons why we banned skype from all of our networks, years ago. I suggest you do the same. Skype is one of the most ill-behaved programs I have ever come across.
If you REALLY need to see stuff like "I'm Lisa, cum see me on my webcam" then there are alternatives that don't open gaping holes in your security.
Skype is an abomination.
|
|
|
|
|
I just came across what I think it's the longest program parameter I've seen:
-Wno-incompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers
This is from clang-cl; a sort GNU-C in MSVC cl clothing.
Any longer?
-- Gisle V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long indeed, but not a Program paramter.
-- Gisle V.
|
|
|
|
|
I name some of my funcs as exactly what they do, even if it becomes something like:
CheckUSBIDAndIfWeCanHandleItGetDescriptorData(...);
Yeah, its a mouthful, but it dont half make the good freaking self documenting! 
|
|
|
|
|
WhatHappensIfItCant?
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Ignores it and f***s off down the pub! What else do you expect to happen!
|
|
|
|
|
Throw an exception? A tantrum? Plays a wav file going "haha-ha!"?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, it is in the kernel. The execution just wanders off and does something else useful.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Plays a wav file going "haha-ha!"?
Perhaps a laugh similar to Mandark[^]?
On the other hand, you have different fingers. - Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: it dont half make the good freaking self documenting
(please tell me that was sarcasm)
|
|
|
|
|
Nope.
|
|
|
|
|
As long as it's meaningful, I always prefer a long name for methods, variables, properties... whatever you say. 'GetPersonName()' is preferable than 'GetPN()' or 'GetP()' etc. The most important thing is, you don't have to write self-documentation and the person on the other side still understand what the code works. Just my thoughts...
Vote up or Mark as Answered, if this information helped you.Kind Regards - Kunal Chowdhury | Microsoft MVP (Windows Development), Windows 10 Champion
Checkout my 'Technical blog': http://www.kunal-chowdhury.com
|
|
|
|
|
not program parameter (/argument), but related:
A few years ago, the group set down in our company to revise the coding rules tried to set a maximum source code line lenght of 80 chars. Our project leader immediately declared that our code was not to accept that limit: We had rules for creating C #define symbols that lead to symbols exceeding 80 chars (and every character in UPPERCASE). Actuall, we had several guys praising those rules (the same ones who were complaining about the 260 char file name length in FAT file systems).
Going even further back in time: I was working for a company selling their own Fortran compiler. One customer hit one ceiling: A function could have at most 99 parameters; he had more than that.
Another crazy hit-the-ceiling: A friend of mine had to extend a linker: Each module had an export table that was indexed by a signed 16-bit integer. One customer's project created a module which exported more than 32767 symbols. The quick fix was to double the maximum table size by making the index unsigned. The same project created a struct type definition of roughly 8300 lines of code. (That didn't break any limits, though.)
If noone breaks a limit, that limit serves no real purpose...
|
|
|
|
|
Kind of related - many years ago we had someone join our team who was a one finger typist - literally. Used the caps lock key rather than hold down shift whenever he could, that sort of thing.
When we cottoned on to this, method names in our libraries started to "evolve" under the guise of better clarity, so fg() became setDefaultForegroundTextColour() and cp() became setVirtualTextCursorPosition() and so on.
this was before the days of intellisense and auto-completion, of course.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
