|
Rage wrote: he chose numbered items to be in the list and numbered titles landed there (starting mid-list (!) from the selected line downwards)
That's because of the formatting of his document, not a bug. IMO.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I misinterpreted it. It has only to do with the bad color choice. Nevermind.
|
|
|
|
|
The theme doesn't make any difference. It's black text on a dark, navy background, no matter the theme.
And there's nothing archaic about the theme. It's the one that functions best for screenshots.
But I suppose that an amateur like you prefers to have all the stupid "kewl!!! effects!!!" enabled.
Professionals prefer to use their system resources more wisely.
Here[^]. Use that, and you might be able to con passers-by to think you're slightly professional.
Mind you, the MSO team appears to be just as unprofessional as you are -- they certainly chose the right place to put this[^]; it's in the first place anyone would think to look.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what kind of machine you're working on, but I really have more than enough system resources available that a transparent bar here or sliding animation there in my OS do not make a noticeable difference in overall performance. If you don't like the modern look, that's fine, personal preference and all, but the argument about system resources being wasted seems pretty out of date in 2017, unless company politics force you to work on a toaster that someone soldered a VGA port on.
For screenshots, I'd see it as far easier to just turn off transparency, because that's the only thing I can think of that might influence the result of the screenshot, depending on the background.
That way, you also don't get the "but my screen looks totally different!" support calls from the people you make the screenshots for and who might not be using that theme. You wouldn't believe what non-tech-savvy people get stuck on.
Also, if anything makes you look professional, it should be your skills and results, and not your toggling a setting for Office or which theme you chose for your OS.
|
|
|
|
|
I just tore a tab off in VS and dragged it my other monitor... and Windows minimized everything except the tab - including VS.
I'd REAAAALLLLY like to talk to the "designer" and MS who dreamed up this "feature".
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
You must have 'shaken' it. Press and Hold on a window tile bar and moving the mouse quickly back and forth, left to right, will minimize all other windows.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
and if you shake some more, all minimized windows will be restored.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
But if you shake it more than twice, you're playing with it 
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
... and if you shake it even more still, the cables come unplugged and you might even break the monitor.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
ya, but WHY? What a really stupid "feature"
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, at least it's easy to turn off - NOT! 
If you also want to turn off the "snap" feature, you can do it through the mouse settings.
If you just want to turn off the "shake" feature, it's time to go spelunking in the registry or group policy editor.
How do I disable Aero Shake in Windows 7? - Super User[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: If you just want to turn off the "shake" feature, it's time to go spelunking in the registry or group policy editor.
Thank Microsoft. Otherwise we'd miss out on all the fun of possibly irreparably damaging our windows installations.
Yippee-ki-yeah!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Don't confuse a ranter with facts.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
People having Parkinson can only see one window at a time. 
|
|
|
|
|
The one I want to turn off is the wake-from-sleep "here's a picture" feature. OK, Creators edition started obeying the "I don't want to log in every time I use my tablet" switch that Aniversary didn't but I don't want the damn picture either.
Oh,and MS: why does even the Function Key version of the soft keyboard not have a Home or End key? It does at least have Up and Down which the others don't I suppose ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Your choice is:
0. Keep the one useful bit of all this godawful moving-windows-about cr@p AND all the useless, crappy, annoying bits.
1. Do without that one useful bit.
Not too difficult a choice.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
In VS2017, prior to 15.2, Start Page was under the View menu. Now its under the File menu.
I don't want to File the Start Page, I want to view it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I hear ya. That is one of my biggest gripes with MS. FFS STOP MOVING THINGS AROUND!!!
One that REALLLLLLLLLY bugs me is they change the keyboard shortcuts to compile. In VS2016 it was F6, then in 2015 it was CTRL+SHITF+F6 something else, now in my version 2017 it's back to F6.
As far as the Start Page... I hear a lot of ppl say they disable it. I can't understand why. If the feeds are too slow then turn them off, but the MRU list and Project Options are useful.
And, in 2010 MS provided a WPF Start Page template which MS hasn't upgraded since. I once created a really useful start page but I can't now upgrade it.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: VS2016
I must have missed that version!
Kevin Marois wrote: F6
It's always been F5 for me. And Ctrl+Shift+F5 is bound to the "Debug.Restart" command.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: It's always been F5 for me. And Ctrl+Shift+F5 is bound to the "Debug.Restart" command.
Well you just validated my grievance. Should't the option to Compile be the same regardless of version?
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: Should't the option to Compile be the same regardless of version?
But it is: it's F5, and it always has been, in every version of Visual Studio I can remember, at least since "Visual Studio .NET" in 2002. 
EDIT: Correction - F5 is Debug.Start.
Build.Compile is Ctrl+F7, and Build.BuildSolution is Ctrl+Shift+B.
Default Keyboard Shortcuts in Visual Studio | Microsoft Docs[^]
The VS2012 version of the documentation[^] shows how the mapping (used to?) differ depending on which scheme you selected when you first started Visual Studio.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 18-May-17 10:55am.
|
|
|
|
|
For you it is. It's F6 on my Home PC and both my work PC's. And the other Dev's here say the same.
That right there is my point. It should be the same for ALL Visual Studio installations everywhere.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: It should be the same for ALL Visual Studio installations everywhere.
But then you'll get people complaining that they can't customise the shortcuts, and the default isn't the key they want to use.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. And I have no problem with allowing customization... But out of the box it should be the same.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, according to Microsoft, it is:
Debug.Restart: Ctrl+Shift+F5
Debug.Start: F5
Debug.StartWithoutDebugging: Ctrl+F5
Debug.StopDebugging: Shift+F5
Have you picked a different keyboard mapping scheme?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
