|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: you and the Missis had a fight, a big explosion, and the universe came to be.
That is Ryans view apparently. 
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: At which specified size did it become a "too great a mystery"?
At whatever size was sufficient for your question to be asked. 
Eddy Vluggen wrote: And measured in which units?
In whatever units you were using at that time to measure the universe.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: At which specified size did it become a "too great a mystery"?
When the Universe's size was sufficient to include enough six-year-olds to wear out any conceivable number of adults with their questions.
Eddy Vluggen wrote: And measured in which units?
The natural unit of mystery is the "why". Didn't you learn that as a six-year-old?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: And measured in which units
Mysterions clearly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, to paraphrase Symmachus, "The universe is too much for ME to understand, therefore there can't be a single approach to it."
|
|
|
|
|
The only mysteries in the universe are those we can't yet explain.
|
|
|
|
|
assuming the known explanations are correct. 
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are correct enough to be useful!
And that IS good science.
|
|
|
|
|
TRUTH[^]
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
That picture was Photoshopped. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
No really... 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I know that since the days of 8 bit computers. Never get an interpreter to do a compiler's job. This kept me from being contaminated with BASIC and later it saved me from PHP or JavaScript.
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
Javascript's been JIT compiled like C#/Java for a while now.
You need a new excuse to avoid it. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: Javascript's been JIT compiled like C#/Java for a while now.
The poor man's version, at best. It still is slow as hell and only notices that it's dead when it hits the line with the error, like all interpreters.
What do I need excuses for? Anyone who uses such a contraption for any serious work has greater problems than me not liking it.
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Don't know why, but when I posted some replies to some posts in the lounge, the messages went straight for spam review. It did not happen before.
I understand the need for spam reviews but didn't think I would be the "marked man"
Can someone tell me what it this about?
Thanks
I am not the one who knocks. I never knock.
In fact, I hate knocking. Just barge in will'Ya?
|
|
|
|
|
We get a lot of spam coming in on the site, so we have a spam filter that catches anything it's "learned" might be spam. Fortunately the community is pretty quick to approve or disapprove of these things so you won't be in the filter long. You're not a marked man
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I am having the same "issue" and believe it stems from a disgruntled reader marking one of my responses as spam (it was reversed, btw) and since then everything I post or reply goes to the spam review queue.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you get notified that one of your posts have been marked as spam by a reader. Only if you post a new message that gets caught automatically in the filter.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. You both deserve that, but don't worry. look at my answer to the OP below.
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
Good news. You have made enough points in the last days to get the privilege 'Bypass spam checks when posting content'. Obviously you are trustworthy enough now.
I need a perfect, to the point answer as I am not aware of this.
Please don't reply explaining what method overloading is
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: We get a lot of spam coming in on the site, so we have a spam filter that catches anything it's "learned" might be spam. Fortunately the community is pretty quick to approve or disapprove of these things so you won't be in the filter long. You're not a marked man
More correctly, everyone(*) is a marked man until proven unmarked.
(* With apologies for gender incorrectness)
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
That's a relief.
I am not the one who knocks. I never knock.
In fact, I hate knocking. Just barge in will'Ya?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
