|
Need dll for Microsoft.SqlServer.SqlClrProvider[^]
The list claims there are five solutions. When you open the question, there are five solutions. But the solution list claims to be "page 1 of 3":
Clicking any of the links to go to another page shows the question with no solutions, and no option to go back to the first page:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
There are 3 pages of deleted spam. Adding to the TODO
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at Latest Updates[^], I saw a checkbox "Project" at the article filters, that I hadn't seen before. After doing a search on this type, the page told me that there were no results.
That left me with the question, what is a "Project"? (How) can they be submitted?
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for the extended delay but this [^] should explain things.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Since it's possible nowadays to get more than 600 points at signup just by checking all the newsletters we've gotten a few side effects. One we noticed the day before yesterday.
Next one coming up is live hyperlinks and a biographies in the profile. It's only needed 500 points for those as well. And those are much harder to find.
And honestly I find it quite silly that you get silver level just by signing up.
I'd suggest shifting the levels one step up.
no status 0
bronze 100 -> 500
silver 500 -> 1500
gold 1500 -> 2500
platinum 2500 -> 5000
That way you still become something when you sign up for everything, but it doesn't get ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
You do need to subscribe to the newsletters to keep that silver status, and on signing up you are only awarded silver for participation. I hear you, but at this point I'd rather adjust levels required that rejig silver participation.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The important part is to stop the ability to post spam and links in the profile at signing up. How it's done is certainly less important.
That problem still isn't addressed, and it's only a question of time before they realize they can do that again.
|
|
|
|
|
My account under the username blizzerand was recently closed because some moderators reported the account. I don't understand the reason why it was closed. Can someone walk me through the procedure to get it back?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much for your message. It seems you posted an article that plagiarized at least two sources:
Security of JavaScript Applications – JavaScript UI Libraries — DHTMLX – Medium[^]
Security Vulnerabilities in Web Apps – Chirag Goel – Medium[^]
Unfortunately plagiarism is a growing problem on CodeProject. We've tried many things to tackle this issue. We've re-activated accounts of plagiarists and even worked with them to teach them what plagiarism is, and tried to work with them to get their articles in working order.
Experience has taught us this method does not work. A recurring theme with plagiarists is that they want their articles published, regardless of the cost. Publishing an article correctly on CodeProject, that is, publishing an article that aims to teach and exhaustively explains as much as possible about a subject or particular problem and its solution, is far more important than simply getting an article published. The focus should never on being published, the focus should be on using your own words and your own knowledge to help others.
Posting a piece of plagiarized material conflicts with CodeProject's purpose, and is hurtful to a community full of authors. As such, neither your article nor your account will be restored and this will be our last say on the matter.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 10
IE 11.785.16299.0
I can only scroll a forum with the mouse wheel. This does not happen on other sites.
When I try to drag the scroll slider to the bottom of the window, the left column gets messed up, and the slider flashes, but cannot be dragged.
EDIT ==============================
And now it appears to be okay...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I love these types of bugs. I merely have to wait for IE to switch back to reality and it's all good again
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The list of recent questions on the home page is still showing the earlier spam:
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this still an issue for you? If so, do you have ad-blockers installed?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It is working now (no idea why or what have changed)...
I do have ad blocker, but disabled for CP (I know we need it  )...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
I might be wrong here, but I noticed that the spammers today all had more than 600 reputation points, which should not be possible if they just signed up today as far as I know.
But I've seen that when some people rejoin using an old email they recieve the old points connected to the previous account.
I believe this might be the loophole needing to be plugged.
|
|
|
|
|
You get 50 or 100 just for signing up to a newsletter. Pretty easy to get 600 off the bat.
See this[^] and a couple of other threads.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
If you check everything at signup you get 352 points.
|
|
|
|
|
Scrap my previous answer, I just realized you get 50 points PER newsletter, not just 50 points in total as I believe it used to be.
|
|
|
|
|
isn't that used to be 0 or 100?
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
Users with sufficient reputation no longer go through the spam checker. Yesterday they required 600 points to get past Silver status, so the spammers were signing up and doing enough "things" that they'd gain 600 points and then they could spam with impunity.
I updated this so members now require Gold status in order to avoid the spam checker.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Just thinking loud here, but is it possible to run ALL messages through the spam filter, but have different trigger levels above and below the threshold?
Those astrologer posts really should have triggered every bell in the country.
I can personally live with having an occasional post stuck in the filter.
|
|
|
|
|
In theory yes but it would be total guess work as to setting a ‘more relaxed’ threshold. We’re already trying to be relaxed as it is.
I totally understand what you mean though and it’s a great idea.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
So what about a fuzzy threshold?
Make it inversely proportional(ish) to the rep points above say 1000 or so, while keeping it at 'right out bastard' below that.
|
|
|
|
|
You can't see anything in QA except "black magic" crap at the moment, and they are posting faster than we can remove the dross. The spam filter seems to be ignoring them as well, and it's had plenty of examples!
How about a "Protector" only report option: two protectors hit it and the account is closed or suspended and all posts, comments, messages, questions, and answers go to a "quarantine" for staff inspection? It would "clean up" the site quickly (and manually reporting 90+ QA questions for one user takes time) and that should discourage the idiots from posting at all.
Yesterday was a tester: "Can we get past the detector?".
Today would seem to be "payload day" - and the site looks like a New Age Drivel site because you can't see anything but astrology in QA ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
