|
People always over-play these things. No one is going to go after you for quoting a movie. A lot of people have gotten a financial free ride off the backs of content creators for a long time, and more action on the part of governments has been needed. But no one is going to waste time (and a lot of money) going after people who are doing things that aren't remotely causing any real financial damage. It would be counter-productive.
But having more tools to go after web sites and companies who are doing real damage is a very good thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - because you can always trust governments and bureaucracies to do the right thing... 
Socialism is the Axe Body Spray of political ideologies: It never does what it claims to do, but people too young to know better keep buying it anyway. (Glenn Reynolds)
|
|
|
|
|
It's got nothing to do with the right thing. It's about practicality. You would go broke in a very short time, and accomplish nothing, if you tried to do those sorts of things. That was pretty well demonstrated in the US by record companies going after individuals. They spent a lot of money and actually went backwards.
And, though I've not read the EU thing, if it's like the US, then it's primarily a civil thing. Unless you are involved in organized crime and/or doing large scale pirating, then government isn't remotely going to get involved. So it becomes a matter of being sued by the companies you are stealing from. And they, like the US record companies, cannot do that on any remotely significant scale. They will have to pick their fights where it really matters.
The amount of money required to press a single case is pretty crazy, as is all legal activity pretty much. Unless you are going to save/get back quite a few times more than that, it's a counter-productive undertaking.
I mean, the US has had these types of laws for a long time. Are they out going after people quoting movies? Of course not. They have gone after a fairly small number of really offensive offenders, who were raking in big bucks via copyright violations. And that's about all they can afford to do.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
Dean Roddey wrote: It's got nothing to do with the right thing.
A truer statement has never been made - actions by the government have NEVER been about "doing the right thing".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Of course it's easy to take that position, though it's wrong. Governments are made up of people, and people sometimes do the right thing and sometimes do the wrong thing. Sometimes they do those by intent and sometimes by accident.
But, for the most part, governments are the way they are because we make them that way. People complain all the time about the government, about schools, etc... but they then do exactly what makes those things the way they are.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
Dean Roddey wrote: people sometimes do the right thing
Yeah, but once they get into government, they are corrupted (or are compelled to ignore their principles) by those already in office.
Voting doesn't matter, because it doesn't matter who is elected.
We should probably stop here because this is stepping solidly into soapbox material...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Ever wondered why it doesn't matter so much who is elected? What part of that equation doesn't change depending on who is elected? The people of course. Think about it.
Explorans limites defectum
|
|
|
|
|
Dean Roddey wrote: Governments are made up of people, and people sometimes do the right thing
mostly accidentally (at least governments)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Which is because noone can ever agree on what the "right thing" is.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I didn't expect the Spanish inqui...
Hold on. Someone's just kicked in my front door. I'd best go and see who it is.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
... nope, just doesn't have the same ring to it.
Anyhow, I'm looking for opinions about places to visit in both Sweden and Denmark. I'll be over there for a couple of weeks come the end of June and beginning of July. Not necessary tourist things (although not barring those necessarily), more of things that people who live there feel are important or interesting.
Planning to spend some time in Smaland, Ostergotland, and Gotland because half of my family originated there (four of my Great-grandparents were Swedish). Denmark on the other hand is purely a whim. One of my friends stated that while most of Scandinavia is very similar, I would be doing myself a disservice by not visiting Denmark while I had the opportunity.
Might put in some applications and see if I can swing some interviews too... because why not?
|
|
|
|
|
As for Denmark, Copenhagen is a very nice city with LOTS of stuff to see and do.
I might be biased (born in Copenhagen, living in Stockholm), but in my opinion, Copenhagen is much more interesting than Stockholm and has a lot more to offer, despite being smaller.
Jörgen will probably disagree, and he owns guns, so I can't say anymore right now... 
Gotland (or more specifically Visby) is definitely worth a visit, though! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: Jörgen will probably disagree, and he owns guns, so I can't say anymore right now...
I thought ownership was very limited in both countries.
|
|
|
|
|
It is, but Jörgen has contacts...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Only when compared to the US.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, I'm not disagreeing.
Stockholm is also full of Stockholm natives.
|
|
|
|
|
Being RickZeeland, I like Zealand in Denmark, especially the white cliffs of the island Møn.
I also found the city of Århus very pleasant, especially the ARoS museum is worth a visit: Your rainbow panorama[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I second the white cliffs (or Møns klint[^] as they are called in Danish)
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
modified 16-Apr-19 9:50am.
|
|
|
|
|
RickZeeland wrote: ARoS museum is worth a visit: Your rainbow panorama[^]
That looks amazing! Definitely need to visit.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh, nations of great seamen. How about visiting a museum with a ship that did not get out of sight of its dock[^]?
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, well, 1300 meters is better than nothing, I guess... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Was it not the old problem between the customer and the project team? I think it was the king who knew better than his shipbuilders how many guns you can put onto that ship or how close to the waterline the gunports can be.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
Something like that, yes... 
It certainly wasn't the programmers eh, SHIPBUILDERS fault! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Naturewise I'd say Norway is totally outstanding. While Denmark is mostly flat.
But it has Europes largest sand dune, and totally amazing beaches, if you don't mind freezing your butt off.
Sweden and Norway are both large countries so you need to plan your trip fairly well.
But to properly try to answer your question you need to tell us what your main interests are with the trip.
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough and honestly my interests are a little vague but a key goal is being far enough away that work can't contact me, even in an emergency. 
Besides the three regions mentioned (still going through their respective visitor sites), I do want to visit the Museum of Failure. I enjoy any sort of quirky or out of the ordinary museum, districts, or shop. Honestly, anything that would make you stop, look at it and think to yourself "Hmm, what train of thought helped someone arrive at this?" even if it was simply the crazy train.
For example, I was in Paris a few years back and really enjoyed going this one part of the city where a bunch of artists has set up and were selling their pieces. Sort of like an open air farmer's market for art. When I go to art museums, I find myself drawn to the contemporary and modern art sections.
One of the biggest reasons I travel is to get an idea of how people from a completely different region and background view our world. I feel it helps to expand and mature my own worldview as well as serving to remind myself that we're all on this big ball whipping through space together.
Along side that I'd like to take in the culture, a taste of "what it means to be Swedish (or Danish)" if you would. As I mentioned, been researching and submitting applications to companies in Malmö, Stockholm, and Copenhagen (Dev/BA/PM/all around Problem Solver TM). So while trying to plan, I'm also trying to keep things flexible should the opportunity for interviews present itself.
I'm fortunate enough that I don't have anything preventing me from moving to another country to live and work. Been pondering it for a couple years and decided now is the time to move forward and pull the trigger. That said, this is a bit of a dry run for the region. If I can't see myself living there then it doesn't matter how great any theoretical job might be.
Unfortunately think Norway is off the list this go-around due to time constraints. Which sounds like a shame with how you describe it and from what I've seen. I'm an Eagle Scout and have spent months if not years of my life backpacking. Fortunately, my most recent goal is to visit at least one place I've never been to before each year... so maybe next year. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
