|
He could always stop banning accounts that give opinions that don't meet the progressive-liberal-left narrative. It's no secret that anyone with an opinion to the right of Gandi is not welcome on Twitter, and he has conceded this in his admission that there is bias on the platform. This is why Gab was created.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, such is the terrible nature of censorship that one can only marvel at how the glorious leader of the USA manages to Tweet eight impossibly stupid things every day before breakfast.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
I would much prefer people were allowed to tweet stupid, even offensive things, than have censorship.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
So you would be happy for Al Queeda to have a platform?
Would you extend the same freedom to paedophile rings?
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
I'm talking about the right to free speech. To my knowledge terrorist groups and paedophiles are both illegal.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic Burford wrote: I'm talking about the right to free speech
So am I.
If you believe in free speech as an absolute, you believe in the right of anybody to advocate anything and that includes Islamists, paedos, nazis and other assorted pond-life.
If you accept that free speech comes with inherent limitations against advocating illegality and indecency, then you should accept that Twitter are right to ban certain offenders without such actions being labelled as excessively censorial.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
You're taking edge case examples to try to prove a general point. It doesn't work.
Moving on, Twitter has banned many people for wrongthink. They have banned many conservatives for example for stating opinions which differ from the echo chamber inhabited by progressive-liberals. People have been suspended for opinions such as transgender men and not men (and consequently transgender women and not women). Deadnaming and misgendering are also offences that can get you kicked off the platform.
Do you agree or disagree that those with contradictory views should be suspended / banned from Twitter?
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
The edge-cases absolutely do need to be considered.
If I were, for example, to Tweet "Up the IRA!", I would expect to have my Twitter account closed. Furthermore, I'd take it on the chin rather than going on about evil liberal conspiracies, political correctness, the New World Order and Great Cthulhu, and say "Yeah. Fair cop, I crossed a line there!"
Now most of your list of offences relate to gender issues but is not possible that the posts in question were abusive rather than "wrong"? Let's face it, a lot of closet cases do get very rude when dealing with LGBT types and such subjects are always going to be a gathering point for trolls. I can't imagine that it's simply a case of people getting kicked off accidentally transposing a pro-noun or two. It would be interesting to see some examples.
I again, repeat, my slightly tongue-in-cheek comment at the start of this thread. We can safely ignore the notion that all loony-right thought is somehow barred from Twitter because Trump posts his brain-farts on there every day!
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
PeejayAdams wrote: The edge-cases absolutely do need to be considered.
No, they seriously don't.
Using Twitter to recruit terrorists is NOT a free speech issue
Using Twitter to allow paedophiles to communicate with each other is NOTa free speech issue.
De-platforming someone for voicing their opinion that transgender men are not men (and vice versa) IS a free speech issue.
If you want to discuss free speech issues, then I'll gladly join in. Otherwise, count me out.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
If you seriously think that edge cases don't matter, never get a job as a software tester. The devil is ALWAYS in the detail.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
If you implement code to cater for edge cases before focussing attention on the key functionality, then don't get a job as a software developer.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
After years of building the iPhone primarily in China, Apple is preparing for a major expansion of iPhone manufacturing in India. India, Wisconsin?
|
|
|
|
|
Intel was reportedly struggling to produce 5G chips in time for the 2020 iPhone. You know what they say, if at first you don't succeed, give up and try an entirely different business.
|
|
|
|
|
Volkswagen will use Chinese software developers to help design a global autonomous vehicle architecture thanks to the prevalence of qualified programmers which carmakers are struggling to hire elsewhere If you can program a car to drive in China, it can drive anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Volkswagen China’s passenger cars chief Stephan Woellenstein said: In a short period from now they will be able to do 15 to 20 million lines of programming code on an annual basis
Who the hell measures productivity or success by LOC? 
They can hire me and I'll give them roughly that amount a day 
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: I'll give them roughly that amount a day
Documented in Chinese? 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
That was my first reaction too. If SmogWagen is using such a pernicious anti-metric to gauge progress I expect the results to be about as safe as their emissions control systems were green.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Who the hell measures productivity or success by LOC? 
IBM did. And it was a great success (for Microsoft).
Oh sanctissimi Wilhelmus, Theodorus, et Fredericus!
|
|
|
|
|
and the emissions will be negative.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
"Turn light at the right", says the car!
Oops, that is only if you take physical control of the driving!  
|
|
|
|
|
If the questions asked at Nvidia's forums are any indication, they do not have a prevalence of qualified programmers.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Linkage : Microsoft buys Express Logic, adds a third operating system to its IoT range | Ars Technica[^]
This will give them another OS for IoT devices. ThreadX is a very lightweight, real time OS so this could be very useful. That is, depending on how it is made available to users and corporations. It will be interesting to see how this works out.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
ThreadX is very lightweight. CE was pretty lightweight as well and a very good embedded OS. Microsoft didn't care and won't care now.
|
|
|
|
|
CE might have been appropriate for IoT devices but I think they scuttled it before the market for IoT stuff really took off.
As for ThreadX, they wasted a lot of money if they really don't care. I hope they see it for what it really is. What I mean by that is it's main focus is being very lightweight so shoe-horning .net into it would be entirely absurd. They need to get C and C++ to work on it and keep it ultra minimalist.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Rick York wrote: They need to get C and C++ to work on it and keep it ultra minimalist.
Agree!
I often find myself wondering even about RPi. I own one and messed around with it.
It seems overkill for most embedded type of stuff and it is seriously minimal compared to a lot of IoT stuff, maybe comparable to windows ce and PocketPC.
But it's too large for IoT stuff. With IoT you just want some discrete component that runs on its own and does something very simple. These things like RPi are entire OSes seems too large for IoT to me.
For IoT they should be thinking extremely small like Arduino.
Just straight-up C based programs that can do a lot but is very minimal. Yes, I know that the Arduino IDE and associated language isn't quite just C but I think you know what I mean.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
