|
Scott Serl wrote: Nevermind...they don't offer one for that processor architecture.
Ah, right, that was the issue!
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't that from the band of programmers called Uriah Heap? 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus points 
|
|
|
|
|
RickZeeland wrote: Bonus points
Yes, he's certainly stackin' them up!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
That just doesn't register with me.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I ![Heart | [heart]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/love.gif) Heep!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
.NET Core has become so feature rich now that porting really is becoming far less painless (and actually possible!) than before.
I'm a fan. Especially since I can now write C# on the mac.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When does it get so feature rich that it no longer is just Core?
|
|
|
|
|
.NET Core++
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
As always, I look forward to the article(s) ! cheer, Bill
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: God only knows what ASP.NET vs. ASP.NET Core conversion would be like though.
I recently had to use .NET Framework for a WCF service.
I used to be quite a fan of EF, but for the past couple of years I've only been using EF Core.
Tried to run EF, but it was a PITA to go back, so I tried EF Core and it runs very nicely with my WCF Service.
Then I had to share the package between the WCF Service and an Azure Function (in .NET Core), so I switched the project type to a .NET Standard 2.0 project and everything just worked
The only downside I found was that I now needed an extra console app for running the EF Core Migrations tooling, for some reason that didn't work with the Azure Function project.
All these .NET versions are quite confusing though... And it seems there's another one coming to rule them all...[^] 
|
|
|
|
|
|
England swings like a pendulum do.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, that's it - you've won the internets today ya bastiche.
I give up. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
It don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing ...
|
|
|
|
|
Or would you rather be a pig?...
|
|
|
|
|
Budapest By Blimp?
edit: no - Ability To Swing.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if PornHub.com has an opening for a penetration tester?
|
|
|
|
|
"The filtering is client-side, so the API can still be queried for the position data"
I read a blog the other week that impressed the importance of doing your validation on the client side.
It almost made me weep with frustration.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Validate early and validate often?
|
|
|
|
|
Validate on the backend, as close to the sensitive data as possible!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
What the blog probably mean is that it was important to valid on all sides, i.e. including client side! 
|
|
|
|
|
I've been tempted to write an app along similar lines, so that I can pretend that it got hacked but I'm worried that evil, nasty hackers might steal and release the user data.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Borderline non-KSS
Put it in the soapbox. Oh wait, I forget, Chris is a Nazi. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
For some reason the Find and Replace output in VS started appending results, which I "find" (harhar) quite annoying. Lived with it for a while, not sure how it happened.
So just now I discovered the "Append results" option under "Result options" in the dialog. I must have hit Alt-D at some point in time, like a month ago or so, haha.
A sometimes useful feature. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
