Accessing files in File System vs Saved file in Sql Server 2008 R2

Areff asked:

Hi every body.

I have about 100,000,000 images (each one's size less than 10K , averagely 6K) means about 570GB and at the moment i had stored all of them in SQL Server 2008 R2 in one table.

my question is that which way has better speed in accessing them ?

1. Images stay in sql server with a asp.net page or web service for accessing each image with a given image name or id. (maybe using some technics like distributing the sql server on several servers or MS SQL Server parallel data warehouse)

2. Extracting all images to file system and accessing them via IIS ?

my first and important concern is about accessing speed .

Tags: SQL Server, Performance, File system

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

Cancel

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

Please note that all posts will be submitted under the http://www.codeproject.com/info/cpol10.aspx.